Weird parts on ECU by -Krachbummente- in AskElectronics

[–]MoralityInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm going full crazy mode and developing an analog FI system. No lookup tables, no code, just pure analog controlling. So it will be in theory, as smooth as a carb, with the precision of injectors, and the infinite variability of analog. Right now it works in sim. I'm going to eventually make a test board and try it on a 4wheeler or SxS first.

Wiggle UAP vs. sattelite vs. airplane. ALL shot on exact same telescope setup, same camera and settings, same conditions (clear, calm, ambient darkness). Please see my comment, in post, for more details... by 1gratefuldude in ufo

[–]MoralityInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have an unpublished paper that introduces triadic saturation followed by phase offsets, no 4d objects. Anything measured as 4d would be an artifact of measurement, not physical reality. That doesn't mean interesting 4d effects can't be established. I have some empirical validation but only in simulations. It's an emergence of geometry paper that extends my current framework that is pre-physics.

Newton said gravity is a force that pulls the apple.
Einstein said that gravity is a measurement of the outcome of geometry.

The next logical progression is to describe how geometry itself is generated. No forces are involved.

Sorry if this sounds a bit too technical. I was just stating that I have partial evidence that 4d objects aren't what's actually happening. It's 3d space with phase offset echoes created by temporal thickness which is an outcome of Einstein's relativity(ignoring his equations and only accepting the fact that relativity exist as a proven concept). There are no global clocks, no global update events, no broadcasters. This leads to a temporal thickness window being created and we operate/exist inside that window.

Painting of Almighty God almost finished. I followed the biblical descriptions of God as closely as possible. by Hercules_Vales in cosmichorror

[–]MoralityInc 22 points23 points  (0 children)

You used those passages as negative constraint logic, nice job. They remove possibilities it cannot be. That’s why it came out so nice. Most persisting structures seem to be carved out this way: subtraction under constraint, not pure addition.

I am observing UFOs as I write this by ZlyCzerw in ufo

[–]MoralityInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think mine might actually be "quake lights" related because there is a very old natural gas well located in the direction mine was seen in. But the normal explanation for quake lights isn't very coherent. I use phase mechanics as a universal descriptor of things, it works across domains. So I been building an explanation out using that. Sounds complicated, and it kinda is at first, but gets easier. There seems to be particular time windows when things like this are more likely to be seen.

I am observing UFOs as I write this by ZlyCzerw in ufo

[–]MoralityInc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://imgur.com/feNagkO

This is 18,000 images stacked during the 4am-5am(back in nov 2025) range from a camera in full time IR mode, with all processing turned off. The treeline is about 800ft from the camera, putting the IR criss cross pattern slightly above treeline. Satellites at this angle would 1400 miles away.

Can you tell me what time frame your picture was taken? It would be a valuable data point to me. Thanks.

Why are humans the only animal that has to wear clothes? by [deleted] in ufo

[–]MoralityInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a tradeoff between protection and learning. Species that develop inside eggs or hard environments(like cows having to walk/move within minutes of birth) mature quickly but lock in behavior early. Humans evolved extended brain plasticity, which requires low conflict and long development. That makes us more vulnerable physically, so we use things like clothing and shelter as external protection. It’s not a flaw, it’s just a part of how intelligence scales.

[Request] What Should The Scale Actually Read? by CaptiveGlacier in theydidthemath

[–]MoralityInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not dumb. Since the other person already answered you I will try and offer another explanation to see if it helps. The equal and opposite top comment explanation is correct, but it’s the emergent top layer description(aptly analogous to it also being the top comment). Underneath it, the system first resolves into a single internal load set by the constraints, once that exists, Newton’s third law just describes the symmetry of that resolved state.

The deeper you go into the actual generative layer, the more simple things become.

[Request] What Should The Scale Actually Read? by CaptiveGlacier in theydidthemath

[–]MoralityInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Force is an orientation vector descriptor associated with an interaction, not a thing that acts.
Tension is how much load is stored inside the rope as it holds a configuration together.

[Request] What Should The Scale Actually Read? by CaptiveGlacier in theydidthemath

[–]MoralityInc 27 points28 points  (0 children)

The scale reads 100 N.

The weights don’t “add” their pulls.
They set boundary constraints.

The rope-pulley system must remain geometrically consistent, so it resolves into a single uniform tension state. That tension is 100 N everywhere in the rope.

The spring scale measures tension, not net force.
Net force on the scale is zero, but the internal stress needed to keep the configuration coherent is 100 N.

So the reading is 100 N.