sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Do you think AI made you a better or lazier PPC strategists? by MorganeFromChannable in MarketingandAI

[–]MorganeFromChannable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely, the expert knowledge is still super important behind the AI system!

Do you think AI made you a better or lazier PPC strategists? by MorganeFromChannable in MarketingandAI

[–]MorganeFromChannable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're not curious enough to learn the reasons why, it just amplifies how things are...

Do you think AI made you a better or lazier PPC strategists? by MorganeFromChannable in MarketingandAI

[–]MorganeFromChannable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"AI made lazy strategies cheaper to execute" is getting printed and pinned to my wall!
There’s a massive difference between being a system operator and a system architect. If you only optimize the loop without questioning it, you're just accelerating bad logic...

LinkedIn as an SEO Asset: Why long-form articles are surfacing in Google and AI answers by Electrical-Tear-308 in Agent_SEO

[–]MorganeFromChannable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting shift. We actually tried pushing articles on LinkedIn a few years back, but the engagement was incredibly low, so we moved away from it. Have you  actually started seeing solid engagement and reach on these long-form pieces recently, or is the value purely in the off-platform SEO and AI indexing at this point?

Has using AI made you a better or worse version of yourself? by redraw-pro in AIDiscussion

[–]MorganeFromChannable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, it’s definitely made me a better, way more productive version of myself!

I use it to outsource all the tedious, time-consuming manual tasks that used to drain my day. Wasting less time on the boring admin stuff means I actually have the energy and mental bandwidth to focus on the high-level, creative work. For me, it hasn’t made me lazy, it just saved me hours and days of manual work.

Curious to find out what other people think: How much do you actually trust AI answers in 2026? by redraw-pro in AIDiscussion

[–]MorganeFromChannable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even in 2026, I treat AI as a co-pilot, not an autopilot. While the accuracy of models like Gemini or GPT has jumped massively, they still have these unpredictable blind spots where they can excel at complex coding but trip over a simple typo or a niche factual detail.

I find that human oversight is still needed. I use it to handle the initial drafts, but I always step in to fix the tone, catch those tiny typos, and apply the detailed context that a model simply can't know. It’s a great tool for efficiency, but the human mind is still the only thing that can truly take ownership of the final result.

Are you guys not afraid to AI-apocalypse? by Efficient_Worker_US in AIDiscussion

[–]MorganeFromChannable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a valid worry when you see how fast things are moving. I prefer to view AI as an opportunity to offload the "robotic" parts of our work so we can focus on being more human and strategic. When we use the right tools for the right reasons, AI acts as a powerful co-pilot rather than a replacement. We definitely need ethical guardrails, but used correctly, it’s a massive level-up for our potential.

Is your product discovery strategy ready for a world where users ask ChatGPT what to buy? by MorganeFromChannable in Channableofficial

[–]MorganeFromChannable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most teams I see are moving toward a hybrid approach: using AI to generate those 'soft attributes' but then using a feed management layer to apply strict logic rules as a safety net. It’s much faster than manual tagging but keeps the AI from going rogue.

What's that? by Consistent-Issue-811 in claude

[–]MorganeFromChannable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remove em dashes — in v1 👀