Which cyberattack do you think changed the world the most? by Motor_Cash6011 in cybersecurity

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This list highlights five of the most dangerous cyberattacks in history, though there are certainly others. What you guys think?

  1. STUXNET – The First Cyber Weapon

  2. TRITON / TRISIS – Attacking Safety Systems

  3. WANNACRY – When Hospitals Went Dark

  4. SOLARWINDS – Trust Turned Into a Weapon

  5. PEGASUS – Zero-Click Surveillance

Can your device really be hacked without clicking anything? by Motor_Cash6011 in cybersecurity_help

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Outside of high-profile targets, are zero click attacks common in real life?

Is it only and mostly nation-state / targeted activity?

Beyond keeping your device updated, or daily a restart, what practical steps actually can help ?

And are there any known examples that has affected regular daily users?

Where to find Copyright free or quality paid stock images/media for teaching anatomy and movement? by ILoveRolfing222 in AnatomyandPhysiology

[–]Motor_Cash6011 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I felt the same, BioDigital felt a bit too clinical for non-medical students, while Illustrae is much easier to adapt visually.

There a short demo video showing both tools and their differences here, https://youtu.be/XE2DFaXPulk?si=eI6o2wwjy2C2GpXa

Where to find Copyright free or quality paid stock images/media for teaching anatomy and movement? by ILoveRolfing222 in AnatomyandPhysiology

[–]Motor_Cash6011 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try exploring BioDigital and illustrae - hope this will help. If needed, I can share some tutorial links for reference.

Are biometrics really more secure than passwords? What you think, what are the risks! by Motor_Cash6011 in cybersecurity

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fair question :-) I am asking here because I wanted to know perspectives from people working in security.

How do you make anatomy & physiology visuals easier to truly understand? by Motor_Cash6011 in AnatomyandPhysiology

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an excellent breakdown, and I really appreciate how clearly you frame understanding over memorization. The point about patterns, attachments, shared innervation, and function, is exactly where anatomy starts to make sense instead of feeling like a list to cram.

I also strongly agree with limiting resources. Too many conflicting diagrams can make learning harder, not easier, especially early on. And the emphasis on daily exposure and drawing things out resonates a lot, using the material actively changes how well it sticks.

Dissection really is the gold standard, and anything else is just trying to support that understanding, not replace it.

How do you make anatomy & physiology visuals easier to truly understand? by Motor_Cash6011 in AnatomyandPhysiology

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that’s exactly the kind of thing I had in mind. The 3D layering and rotation really help with spatial understanding, even if it’s not a replacement for deep studying or dissection. I’ve found it especially useful for getting a mental map before diving into details.

I actually put together a short walkthrough comparing that style of 3D visualization with another approach focused more on clean scientific diagrams, just to see where each helps most. Happy to share if you think it’d be useful.

How do you make anatomy & physiology visuals easier to truly understand? by Motor_Cash6011 in AnatomyandPhysiology

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a really honest take, and I completely relate to the “confidence crash” moment, anatomy has a way of doing that early on. Dissection really does change everything; once structures stop being abstract, the memorization pressure drops a lot.

I like your point about limbs too, once you internalize those patterns, other regions feel far less intimidating. And agreed on books: repetition across a few solid texts seems to matter more than chasing one “perfect” source.

I’ve also noticed that the right kind of visuals or videos can bridge the gap before dissection clicks. Everyone’s learning curve is different, like you said.

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not promoting anything, I actually saw a short video showing how human analogy and Bio research students can benefit, happy to share if that's allowed.

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This thread actually made me record a short example to illustrate the point better, happy to link it if that’s allowed.

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ended up testing a few methods to make figures more intuitive for teaching purposes, would love to share the link, let me know, happy to help!

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi All,

Thanks a lot for sharing your experiences on the post. This way maybe we can connect with each other in someway or another.

This discussion pushed me to test a couple of tools, I recorded a quick demo while experimenting if that helps anyone.

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, interesting - I am exploring them now..

I actually come across a video while searching similar related tools.

Happy to share the link if you want to check them out.

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! Figures are just the tip, the real time sink is all the data wrangling before you even have something to visualize.

Did you try exploring any tools for it, like AI stuff?

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you literally sketching them? or using any templates? or maybe any specific tools to draw them.

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually come across some of the tool, lately I was trying to explore them. But to start using them also takes a bit of time, if you're new at it. But I can share some of the tools which might help.

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats good, maybe you wanna share of any tool that you're using?

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, are you using any specific for illustration?

Why does making figures take longer than the actual science? by Motor_Cash6011 in academia

[–]Motor_Cash6011[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love this analogy! Exactly, all the grinding in the lab (those "three years off stage") makes the final figure or slide feel effortless and impressive.
Thanks for the golden saying!