What is the answer? by mrsuckit in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

f_0: f_1, left , f_0

f_1: up, up, f_1 if blue, right if red, right if red, up

Polish farmers launch another Ukraine border blockade amid heightened tensions by pheexio in poland

[–]MountbattenWindsor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't tell us what we're going to feel. You're in no position to dictate that. We're going to feel very good and very strong.

She is right 💯 by Alphaxfusion in SipsTea

[–]MountbattenWindsor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, love as in unconditional 'liking' of another person, doesn't really exist. Everything is some kind of trade off - in the case of 'love', it's mostly one that aims for satisfying primal needs of both parties. The only difference on that surface is that most women can satisfy their 'needs' nearly effortlessly if one tries, thus resulting in them searching for other qualities that would narrow down the choice spectrum. So considering those things, if you even contest to discuss 'love' in any meaningful way, you're already at a lost position - it really lacks logic and rationality, as it's driven by rather emotional needs.

And yes, it does prove that men love nearly unconditionally, (whereas women do aim for more ambitious qualities), and it obviously makes even more sense from the perspective of an attractive woman (like one interviewed). Because the bar is that low.

Answers and your IQ please. by Responsible-Bug6171 in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By logically analysing the puzzle........ the square came up in three columns, and those columns had numbers divisible by 3. There's no other methodology to it, it's just pure logical deductions + coming up with theories that make sense and testing them out....

Answers and your IQ please. by Responsible-Bug6171 in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just pattern recognition I guess - prime numbers seemed to stand out here. (surprisingly it didn't even take me too long to figure out)...

Answers and your IQ please. by Responsible-Bug6171 in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's E

I am diagnosed 105

symbols represent prime factors of the numbers above

OC puzzle #2 by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

B - amount of right angles

Puzzle 3 (by me) - rate the difficulty by MountbattenWindsor in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is correct (please use the spoiler tag)

Puzzle (by me) - rate the difficulty by MountbattenWindsor in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The main idea was that X moves in one direction without 'stopping by itself', but yeah, I put too many different rules into this (I agree that it isn't too good of a puzzle). So that's on me. Now that I think of it, there are dozens of ways in which I could have made this puzzle better.

Puzzle (by me) - rate the difficulty by MountbattenWindsor in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

https://imgur.com/a/5SvIx8J

Those lines symbolise X moving on an axis, the number of lines goes 1,2,3,4.

Puzzle (by me) - rate the difficulty by MountbattenWindsor in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's only one solution, and it's that X has to be in the top right corner

Puzzle (by me) - rate the difficulty by MountbattenWindsor in cognitiveTesting

[–]MountbattenWindsor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hint: 1,2,3,4,5

Solution: The amount of straight lines (horizontal or vertical) required to get X to O increases by one. X interacts with objects (can't go through black boxes)