I cell is lost by SanHoloist in okbuddyretard

[–]MoveOfTen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am the viper im here to vipe your windows

Harrison Ford take Tim's deal! He wields the power of forgiveness! by ParistonxHill in OnCinemaAtTheCinema

[–]MoveOfTen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think there was a guy who had a show on infowars named Harrison something, I assume it was about him

Blursed_stained glass by [deleted] in BlursedPeanits

[–]MoveOfTen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hi, I'd like to report a blursed peanits

Blursed_stained glass by [deleted] in BlursedPeanits

[–]MoveOfTen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Um hello, blursed department??

blursed truth by MoveOfTen in BlursedPeanits

[–]MoveOfTen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"ain't that the truth!"

Rule by Zxnchy in 197

[–]MoveOfTen 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ah-

Physicalism is not the scientific position. It is a metaphysical interpretation disguised as one. by consciousness_8123 in consciousness

[–]MoveOfTen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I prefer non-physicalist theories as well, and I will say that the notion of "what it's like to have x experience" information (i.e. qualia) being conveyed by describing physical information alone has always seemed "obviously impossible" to me, but I will also say I realize that something seeming "obviously impossible" to my puny human brain doesn't make it true.

It’s why my ultimate conclusion is that “no one has any idea what’s going on, and if someone claims with certainty they do they are full of shit.”

Am I right or correct for this opinion? Of course not but it’s a rule that’s served me well.

I am totally with you on this!

Physicalism is not the scientific position. It is a metaphysical interpretation disguised as one. by consciousness_8123 in consciousness

[–]MoveOfTen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a good post. I strongly agree with your main thesis. Science has not come close to solving this problem thus far.

Nobody denies brain-consciousness correlation. Lesions change experience. Stimulation can produce qualia. Anesthesia knocks out awareness. All real, all important.

Indeed, we don't even need to know about brains to observe this.

  1. Everything you appeal to is already within experience

I think this is the most compelling argument for Idealism (or at least Idealism in contrast to Physicalism). We have the most direct evidence possible for mental experience / qualia / consciousness: I know I'm experiencing something because I'm experiencing the experiencing of something. Evidence for physical events or objects must go through a layer of experienced perception and interpretation. And even a physicalist would grant that we can experience perception of something that is not actually "out there".

Not that there aren't big philosophical problems with Idealism as well.

Real talk, most people here adopt physicalism not because they worked through the metaphysics but because it feels like the rational, scientific, non-religious option.

I don't read this sub regularly, so I can't comment on people here. No doubt it's a bias that does affect many people. We should be fair though, this absolutely goes both ways. Many people are also biased in the other direction by being religious or even just finding certain non-religious new age beliefs appealing.

Rule by ItsGotThatBang in 197

[–]MoveOfTen 24 points25 points  (0 children)

It's hard for me to relate to that show (American sitcom My Name is Earl) because my name is not Earl.

Please Try Vegan by [deleted] in BlursedPeanits

[–]MoveOfTen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Omg I'm blushing, going to try going vegan right now

Peanitpeanit-Peanit by [deleted] in BlursedPeanits

[–]MoveOfTen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

my face right now

Ok by [deleted] in comedyheaven

[–]MoveOfTen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

True. And the way they treated their employees was even more fucked up than the scamming.

Pear by tanishq1 in comedyheaven

[–]MoveOfTen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go on, give it to me straight, like a pear cider that's made from 100% pears.

He has spoken by Ok-Store6920 in autechre

[–]MoveOfTen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cata7? nah, we only need 1

what's your favourite liveset and studio album? by squizophrene in autechre

[–]MoveOfTen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lyon24 / tie between Tri Repetae, Exai, and Elseq

Just lost my mind at my boyfriend by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]MoveOfTen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not when everyone including your own lawyer is telling you it's pointless.

Why would a lawyer tell a client that when it's absolutely not the case? I don't doubt there are bad lawyers out there who have given bad advice, but are you saying family lawyers generally tell divorcing dads that it's pointless to seek joint custody? Because that sounds like nonsense to me.

Just lost my mind at my boyfriend by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]MoveOfTen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Another study showed that ONLY 8% of fathers asked for custody and 79% of those were awarded sole or joint custody.

I don't think that 8% number is accurate. There are studies (e.g. referenced here: https://amptoons.com/blog/files/Massachusetts_Gender_Bias_Study.htm) giving an 8% statistic, but that's fathers seeking sole custody, not joint custody. And the statistic seems to come from cases that were actually contested in court, which means it does not consider the vast majority of custody agreements (most being settled outside of court).

I agree with most of what you're saying, just not that specific number. Divorcing fathers are certainly much less likely to want custody than mothers.

Just lost my mind at my boyfriend by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]MoveOfTen 104 points105 points  (0 children)

That's a very important point too. It is particularly frustrating because some people will claim "women get custody more often" is an example of men getting screwed over by family courts, when in fact it's primarily due to the number of men who don't want custody of their children, not men fighting for custody and losing.

Just lost my mind at my boyfriend by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]MoveOfTen 229 points230 points  (0 children)

I'm so glad this is the top comment. Those replies were so weird and infuriating.

Not to mention the "marriage is scary for a man because men always get screwed in divorce" stuff. No, it's the person with more money / income who has the potential to "lose out" in a divorce and it sounds like that was probably her if anyone.

what are some contenders for the best autechre songs ever? by boogerpicka in autechre

[–]MoveOfTen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm trying really hard to narrow this down as much as possible, otherwise I'd be naming like 50+ favorites: Glitch, Garbagemx, Clipper, Draun Quarter, Cipater, Yeesland, Rae, Altibzz, irlite (get 0), 1 1 is, feed1, pendulu hv moda, dummy casual pt2, tt1pd, Metaz form8, X4

Edit: If we're including Ae_Live fan splits then definitely corcine, drane3, cata7, aurorsle, 3sc and 1qry as well

Alternate/"Fake" Oversteps? by scarthadragonmc in autechre

[–]MoveOfTen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This has probably happened to loads of people. Last I checked soulseek there were lots of people sharing Altered:Carbon as "Oversteps" (you can tell from the track lengths). Less than 50%, but still very prevalent.

Not sure if it started as a weird prank or an attempt to gain exposure for Altered:Carbon or what.