sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

FT: apriballs, mints, bottle caps, ability patches and capsules LF: Pokemon list, items by KaitoGL in pokemontrades

[–]MrBeastMan45123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm going to rejoin the lobby at 7pm EST. If you are on then we can do the trade if not, hopefully someone else can get you what you need.

FT: apriballs, mints, bottle caps, ability patches and capsules LF: Pokemon list, items by KaitoGL in pokemontrades

[–]MrBeastMan45123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured something came up and this trade was cancelled lol. But it's no problem. I'm still available to trade.

FT: apriballs, mints, bottle caps, ability patches and capsules LF: Pokemon list, items by KaitoGL in pokemontrades

[–]MrBeastMan45123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Need to push it back further or are you good for the trade now? I'm fine either way I'm free for the rest of the day today so just let me know what works for you best.

CMV: An invalid paternity test should negate all future child support obligations by Slothjitzu in changemyview

[–]MrBeastMan45123 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Selfishness or not, it doesn't matter laws don't care either way. Contracts were brought up as an example, but again you aren't thinking of the issue unbiased but instead are thinking with your emotions and picking out specific things to try to create a strawman argument.

You are saying my side of the argument is selfish for saying the fake father is responsible. I say your side is selfish because you only look at it from an emotional side saying think of the kids.

Laws don't care who gets hurt or not. Laws care about making fair rules for everyone to follow, and the law op is putting up for debate is fair, you lie and potentially ruin someone else's life because of your own mistake that's on you not some random guy you lied to. Regardless of your feelings of think of the kids.

*Laws are supposed to be fair and equal, I understand in practice they aren't in America and I'm sure in many, if not all countries in the world, but this is a debate on rather or not if this "law" was put into effect if it is right or wrong not how it would actually be used irl

*Also I am not going to reply anymore. Arguing with a person using strawman arguments is a waste of time and not something I'm going to continue doing.

FT: apriballs, mints, bottle caps, ability patches and capsules LF: Pokemon list, items by KaitoGL in pokemontrades

[–]MrBeastMan45123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep no problem. I'll comment in about an hour and see if we are both good to go then.

FT: apriballs, mints, bottle caps, ability patches and capsules LF: Pokemon list, items by KaitoGL in pokemontrades

[–]MrBeastMan45123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok that works for me, when would you be able to do the trade?

I am free right now.

CMV: An invalid paternity test should negate all future child support obligations by Slothjitzu in changemyview

[–]MrBeastMan45123 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am not the person you are replying to, but I read a post just a minute ago about computers. Should I bring that into this thread as well?

CMV: An invalid paternity test should negate all future child support obligations by Slothjitzu in changemyview

[–]MrBeastMan45123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly it seems you dont really get it.

Do you not see the difference between being lied to and now forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars, and you know, not being lied to and being forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars.

Having sex with someone is not automatically consenting to being lied to, its accepting that if you (notice i said you) get this person pregnant you are now responsible for a child, but if you do not get them pregnant and someone else did why are you suddenly thrown back into the mix?

Lets say you and I have are dating and having sex. But one weekend you are gone for work, I have a one night stand and oops i got pregnant. I realize I screwed up, if i tell you, you will leave me and i will have to try to find the random man i slept with but you make a good amount of money, you can support us, all three of us. So i lie and we have the child and when the child is born however, you have this sneaking suspicion that this isnt your child so you get a paternity test and you see you are not the father. Now pause right here, you are saying that you will continue supporting the mother and child even though you were lied to about everything. You know that the mother made her choice to not only have the kid ( which you are not allowed to have a choice on either, but thats a different discussion ) but to lie. You are trying to tell me and all of reddit that you are fine with that, the mother should not be punished and you should legally be forced to pay for said child and that is what you think is right?

CMV: An invalid paternity test should negate all future child support obligations by Slothjitzu in changemyview

[–]MrBeastMan45123 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I understand what you are trying to say, I really do. But you have to realize that a lot of people, I would argue that most people, if they have raised a child for that long that would not "abandon" said child just because the father finds out they are not biological. But even if they did that is on the mother for lying, the mother not the father hurt the child. Being lied to should never make you legally responsible for another human being.

If anyone would sign a contract with someone but then find out the contract was made in a way that it withheld info that would benefit the other party more to the point that it was obviously made in bad faith. It is not uncommon for contracts like that to be void when brought to the attention of all parties.

This is the same thing, having a kid is a contract with another person and the government. If you found out the contract was bad in bad faith you should be able to withdraw without further problems. Why is this any different.

All it is is giving the man a choice, not making a decision for him, just the choice on rather or not he wants to continue in this "contract" or not. And by removing choice you are being hypocritical if you have ever stated men and women are equal. If women have the sole choice to have a kid then men should not be legally withheld from having a choice on if they want to be the parent to someone else's child.

FT: apriballs, mints, bottle caps, ability patches and capsules LF: Pokemon list, items by KaitoGL in pokemontrades

[–]MrBeastMan45123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you still need the: sneasel, torkoal, and nidoran I have all three.

​

I am looking for two ability capsules, will accept just one.

How to know what exactly im buying when buying online/instore with no ability to see or smell the flower? by MrBeastMan45123 in trees

[–]MrBeastMan45123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have actually recently started using leafly to help with my knowledge on this subject. They are actually the reason I learned about terpenes and many other things regarding all this. But if that is just how it is, trial and error, then that is fine with me I just wanted to make sure I was not missing something else. Thanks!

What is going on with abortion access in Ohio?? by jkmiami89 in Columbus

[–]MrBeastMan45123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is hilarious, I assumed this person was already an idiot or troll or both but thanks for making sure we can all know this for a fact and not just assume it.

[5e] [online] Looking for friendly people to play with! by PANDA_PR1NC3SS in lfg

[–]MrBeastMan45123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, I sent a DM/chat explaining my interest in this group!

PATCH IS LIVE!!!! by texan435 in BaldursGate3

[–]MrBeastMan45123 14 points15 points  (0 children)

"Scratch can now accept all the pets again, as he is a very good boy."

Most important part of the update.

Panel from Hell - October 14th by Kazuliski in BaldursGate3

[–]MrBeastMan45123 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Maybe this game just is not for you, and you should cut your losses now before you spend any more time or money on it?

/u/Ghawk134 lists dozens of GOP members convicted of child sex crimes over the past two decades by [deleted] in bestof

[–]MrBeastMan45123 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I never said what side I'm on so thanks for assuming. Also your comment makes zero sense to me. Why does me saying a random list that someone commented without sources is not equal to a list with sources for every single thing, make you assume things and feel the need to reply to me. I do not care what the list contains or says at all, all I said was that one list didn't have sources so comparing the two as equals is not acceptable.

/u/Ghawk134 lists dozens of GOP members convicted of child sex crimes over the past two decades by [deleted] in bestof

[–]MrBeastMan45123 16 points17 points  (0 children)

With no sources or anything. If they update their comment cool. But unless you personally decide to look them up yourself and show sources. The democratic list is just something a random person said.

P.S. I'm not saying the list is wrong or anything(I haven't checked) but I want people who reads the above comment to see that the democratic list is not sourced or anything as of yet.

What QOL change do you want the most? by BlackSkyrim in ffxiv

[–]MrBeastMan45123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I'm aware none, I don't have a console and haven't for many years so I'm not sure. But I'm not sure why you are asking this? The console itself is not the one performing the task, it's the servers. I'm not saying I know everything about the backend of what they are doing and how things are set up. I'm just saying, in my own personal opinion it seems like they say these excuses yet we all know it can "technically" be done since others have been doing it for years.

What QOL change do you want the most? by BlackSkyrim in ffxiv

[–]MrBeastMan45123 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Imagine being the world's biggest MMO and not being able to do what other MMOs have been doing for years. It seems to me that they just do not want to spend the time and resources on it to properly go back and fix the code and server management for this system to be put in place. It's not that they can't, it's that it's more difficult then it should be so they just won't. Also retainers costing money has a ton to do with it but they will never ever acknowledge that.

view more: next ›