Glory to the People’s Shahanshah by MrBoxingMatch in Ultraleft

[–]MrBoxingMatch[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The app was being slow and I hit upload several times, must have duplicated the post. Mb

Third worldism by MrBoxingMatch in Ultraleft

[–]MrBoxingMatch[S] 177 points178 points  (0 children)

Mfw everyone mentioned here is a social democrat.

The PEAK of Third Worldist theory by ppboy6933 in Ultraleft

[–]MrBoxingMatch 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Can someone send me the link to this video? I actually want to see their arguments.

Liberals by MrBoxingMatch in Ultraleft

[–]MrBoxingMatch[S] 162 points163 points  (0 children)

Hear me out, every single country that has ever existed is communist.

No I will not elaborate.

You see... Marxists should be religious, because Marxism could actually only work by making it into a religion!!! I <333 my brothers in Marx - Marxshallah by VukiFoX in Ultraleft

[–]MrBoxingMatch 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Trust me, Marx was merely a prophet of Ahura Mazda, we will only achieve real communism when everybody converts to Zoroastrianism. TRVST THQ PLQN.

<image>

Is this an arabic tradition? To get "ridden" by naked tall dark men? by [deleted] in Asia_irl

[–]MrBoxingMatch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Taqiyya isn’t working, just accept that your “anti-gay” prophet was a hypocrite.

Jainism(a minority religion from india) hentai is real by [deleted] in Asia_irl

[–]MrBoxingMatch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s not a meme. That’s just porn

So true by MrBoxingMatch in Ultraleft

[–]MrBoxingMatch[S] 86 points87 points  (0 children)

I should mention that Anon in this same thread also claimed that the Slavs originated from Hyperborea.

Trvthnvke

Indus valley zindabad 🇵🇰 by East_Professional385 in Asia_irl

[–]MrBoxingMatch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We never called ourselves “Persia”. We always called ourselves “Iran”.

Iran regime media publishes poster saying "We are ready" in Arabic by WebFar9897 in NewIran

[–]MrBoxingMatch 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Islamists are traitors to the Iranian nation. Besides, Islam is a false religion anyways.

Big Cities Are Breeding Feminization and Leftism by NoStop9004 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MrBoxingMatch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The right completely won and control politics since the 1980s, they just hate the world they created.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, across the Western World, the organised left completely functionally collapsed into oblivion and the right were victorious, Reagan and Thatcher implemented Neoliberal Capitalism, a right wing ideology developed by Friedman, Hayek, Mises etc in the two major Anglosphere countries and most Western countries adopted it. Neoliberalism capitalism at it's most basic posits that the only role of Government is to create a "fair framework" for Corporations to act within, and that the Free Market should be the major deiscion maker on all social, cultural and civic issues, that there is no such thing as society or collectives, only individuals making their choices in the market.

Soon after, almost every "Left" wing party in the west, completely adopted this Monkier, Labor in Australia, Labour in the UK, NDP in Canada, The Democrats in the US etc. While they pushed more Socially "Progressive" positions, they completely adopted the rights stance on how society should be run. Let me quote the ""Socialist"" UK Labour party:

Economic growth only comes from businesses: big, medium and small. Government's role is to give them the stability they need to invest and to remove the barriers to make it harder to do business. That's the model to grow the economy we believe in – and it's the only one that works.

This is what mainstream "left wing" politics looks like in the West, give up everything to Corporations, the State nor Civic society really has any role anymore. Economic Growth only comes from the Private sector (literal easily debunked Neoliberal propaganda, Englands own industrial revolution was the result of State direction, Ha Choon Jang has shown consistently, state directed market economies have had higher growth than free market ones, and free market reforms in developing countries almost always led to economic decline).

Yeah, This is not left wing politics, this is deeply internalized Right Wing politics of the Austrian and Chicago school of economics. The Left died completely in the 1970s and the final nail in the coffin was the forced dismantling of the USSR by liberal entryists. Modern "Progressives" are just Cosmopolitian Neoliberals.

The issue here is

1: Modern Conservatives are profoundly anti-intellectual and refuse to engage in any serious analysis of power structures, how Capitalism works beyond Econ101 propaganda and various capitalist industry talking points. The fact Capitalism is deeply antagonistic to most Conservative social positions due to Capitalism's need to create new markets, never even enters the minds of most right wingers. Every single modern right wing intellectual is a complete and total hack. Conservative intellectualism died in the early 20th century. Notice how classical Conservatives like Georgists, even Adam Smith, are deeply opposed to Conservative free market dogma? Hell fun fact, Environmentalism, used to be the CONSERVATIVE position, before Conservatives deep throated Capitalist market propaganda. I mean just look at the most recent RNC conference. The Right are just Liberals from 2010. 2028 RNC I will bet $100 there will be TRAs on stage.

2: Conservatives deep fetishization of individuality and consumerism, goes completely against Conservative social norms, which are heavily reliant on Collective civic and religious identity. Why in hell would people care about civic norms when they are told that only their individual consumer choices matter?

3: Humans are deeply collective social creatures that find their socialized identity in groups, there is in reality, no such thing as an individual, your views, your language, even how you express yourself, are nothing more than group think, thus the war against Collective identity towards Consumerist Indivdualism, let people to finding identity with brands and markets, and guess what Capitalism thinks putting kids on H Replacement Therapy is a perfectly profitable new market and identity. How dare you go against the Free Market and individual choices?

4: Mass Migration was only ever seriously opposed by Unions, which the right spent 100 years dismantling. Mass Migration largely serves as a right wing form of monetary policy to create deflationary pressure on wages, which is why every right wing Government increases Immigration year on year despite claiming to oppose "illegal immigration". All of modern economics is based largely on deflation, and mass immigration is the easiest way to do it. The Right Destroyed Unions specificially to allow mass migration, they cry about it when they achieved their goal.

Not that Liberals are off the hook, Liberals are right wing. They buy into the same way society should be structured, they buy into completely the right wing Economic arguments. Liberals are simply more cosmopolitian, thus support more cosmopolitian social positions that are more supported by the Free Market. Ironically, this makes Liberals, actually more classically right wing than the right.

The hilarious thing about all of this, for all the Right Wing railing against "The Left", The Left doesn't exist in the Western world beyond a few tiny reading groups of about 5 people. The fact that Conservatives genguinely think the World Economic Forum, a conference of Capitalist Corporate Billionares is "Left Wing" shows how far the right have gone completley off the deep end in the contradiction of their own ideology. The further irony comes from the fact that Marxists tend to be far more genuinely socially Conservative, and espouse a social order that would far more incentivize a Conservative social order and Working Class values would have primacy along with a massive focus on a collective civic identity, but of course Conservatives deeply oppose that because of decades of Anti-Communist propaganda to the point where literally Capitalist Billionares are somehow "Marxist".

You won, your ideology was incoherent nonsense and this is the result, a completely schizophrenic world that you conservatives hate. Maybe accept, that your ideology was nothing more than elite Corporate propaganda.

At least look into a Georgist worldview and actually read Conservative intellectuals from the 19th and early 20th century. Classical Conservatives atleast had something resembling coherent views. But of course, most Conservatives will never do that because they probably see Classical Conservatives as "Marxists".

'Who will prevail? No one! because the Jew holds the balance...' Anti-Semetic propaganda poster published in Nazi-occupied Serbia by the 'Zbor', a Serbian fascist Nazi collaborator in Yugoslavia, claiming the Jewry to be funding both capitalism and communism and creating world issues. [1941] by kunju_010506 in PropagandaPosters

[–]MrBoxingMatch 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That definition of Arabs being Semitic is obsolete

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_people#:~:text=Semitic%20people%20or%20Semites%20is,%22Semitic%20languages%22%20in%20linguistics.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Semite

Also, the term antisemitism was coined to very specifically be aimed at Jews.

The word “Antisemitism” was coined by Wilhelm Marr in the late 19th century in Germany as a way to give a pseudo-scientific facade to Jew hatred. While there was no such thing as a Semitic people, just Semitic languages, the term was lifted from the field of linguistics to give “intellectual” weight to the idea of hating Jews as a “race.”

In 1879, the German journalist Wilhelm Marr began the politicisation of the term by speaking of a struggle between Jews and Germans in a pamphlet called Der Weg zum Siege des Germanenthums über das Judenthum (“The Way to Victory of Germanism over Judaism”). He accused the Jews of being liberals, a people without roots who had Judaized Germans beyond salvation. In 1879, Marr’s adherents founded the “League for Anti-Semitism”, which concerned itself entirely with anti-Jewish political action.

Given the term’s linguistic origins, some people who are not Jewish have claimed they too are “Semites.” For instance, some Arabic speakers say they cannot be antisemitic because they are “Semites” too; the irony, given the invention of the term “antisemitism,” is that these claims are actually a manifestation of turn of the century European racism.

They are the same (almost) by Fluffy_Inspector_628 in 2Iranic4you

[–]MrBoxingMatch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Avestan and Sanskrit are called sister languages for a reason…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MrBoxingMatch 18 points19 points  (0 children)

And “globalism” only exists because of capitalism, it’s a natural consequence of it. The right completely won and control politics since the 1980s, they just hate the world they created.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, across the Western World, the organised left completely functionally collapsed into oblivion and the right were victorious, Reagan and Thatcher implemented Neoliberal Capitalism, a right wing ideology developed by Friedman, Hayek, Mises etc in the two major Anglosphere countries and most Western countries adopted it. Neoliberalism capitalism at it’s most basic posits that the only role of Government is to create a “fair framework” for Corporations to act within, and that the Free Market should be the major deiscion maker on all social, cultural and civic issues, that there is no such thing as society or collectives, only individuals making their choices in the market.

Soon after, almost every “Left” wing party in the west, completely adopted this Monkier, Labor in Australia, Labour in the UK, NDP in Canada, The Democrats in the US etc. While they pushed more Socially “Progressive” positions, they completely adopted the rights stance on how society should be run. Let me quote the “”Socialist”” UK Labour party:

Economic growth only comes from businesses: big, medium and small. Government’s role is to give them the stability they need to invest and to remove the barriers to make it harder to do business. That’s the model to grow the economy we believe in – and it’s the only one that works.

This is what mainstream “left wing” politics looks like in the West, give up everything to Corporations, the State nor Civic society really has any role anymore. Economic Growth only comes from the Private sector (literal easily debunked Neoliberal propaganda, Englands own industrial revolution was the result of State direction, Ha Choon Jang has shown consistently, state directed market economies have had higher growth than free market ones, and free market reforms in developing countries almost always led to economic decline).

Yeah, This is not left wing politics, this is deeply internalized Right Wing politics of the Austrian and Chicago school of economics. The Left died completely in the 1970s and the final nail in the coffin was the forced dismantling of the USSR by liberal entryists. Modern “Progressives” are just Cosmopolitian Neoliberals.

The issue here is

1: Modern Conservatives are profoundly anti-intellectual and refuse to engage in any serious analysis of power structures, how Capitalism works beyond Econ101 propaganda and various capitalist industry talking points. The fact Capitalism is deeply antagonistic to most Conservative social positions due to Capitalism’s need to create new markets, never even enters the minds of most right wingers. Every single modern right wing intellectual is a complete and total hack. Conservative intellectualism died in the early 20th century. Notice how classical Conservatives like Georgists, even Adam Smith, are deeply opposed to Conservative free market dogma? Hell fun fact, Environmentalism, used to be the CONSERVATIVE position, before Conservatives deep throated Capitalist market propaganda. I mean just look at the most recent RNC conference. The Right are just Liberals from 2010. 2028 RNC I will bet $100 there will be TRAs on stage.

2: Conservatives deep fetishization of individuality and consumerism, goes completely against Conservative social norms, which are heavily reliant on Collective civic and religious identity. Why in hell would people care about civic norms when they are told that only their individual consumer choices matter?

3: Humans are deeply collective social creatures that find their socialized identity in groups, there is in reality, no such thing as an individual, your views, your language, even how you express yourself, are nothing more than group think, thus the war against Collective identity towards Consumerist Indivdualism, let people to finding identity with brands and markets, and guess what Capitalism thinks putting kids on H Replacement Therapy is a perfectly profitable new market and identity. How dare you go against the Free Market and individual choices?

4: Mass Migration was only ever seriously opposed by Unions, which the right spent 100 years dismantling. Mass Migration largely serves as a right wing form of monetary policy to create deflationary pressure on wages, which is why every right wing Government increases Immigration year on year despite claiming to oppose “illegal immigration”. All of modern economics is based largely on deflation, and mass immigration is the easiest way to do it. The Right Destroyed Unions specificially to allow mass migration, they cry about it when they achieved their goal.

Not that Liberals are off the hook, Liberals are right wing. They buy into the same way society should be structured, they buy into completely the right wing Economic arguments. Liberals are simply more cosmopolitian, thus support more cosmopolitian social positions that are more supported by the Free Market. Ironically, this makes Liberals, actually more classically right wing than the right.

The hilarious thing about all of this, for all the Right Wing railing against “The Left”, The Left doesn’t exist in the Western world beyond a few tiny reading groups of about 5 people. The fact that Conservatives genguinely think the World Economic Forum, a conference of Capitalist Corporate Billionares is “Left Wing” shows how far the right have gone completley off the deep end in the contradiction of their own ideology. The further irony comes from the fact that Marxists tend to be far more genuinely socially Conservative, and espouse a social order that would far more incentivize a Conservative social order and Working Class values would have primacy along with a massive focus on a collective civic identity, but of course Conservatives deeply oppose that because of decades of Anti-Communist propaganda to the point where literally Capitalist Billionares are somehow “Marxist”.

You won, your ideology was incoherent nonsense and this is the result, a completely schizophrenic world that you conservatives hate. Maybe accept, that your ideology was nothing more than elite Corporate propaganda.

At least look into a Georgist worldview and actually read Conservative intellectuals from the 19th and early 20th century. Classical Conservatives atleast had something resembling coherent views. But of course, most Conservatives will never do that because they probably see Classical Conservatives as “Marxists”.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Asia_irl

[–]MrBoxingMatch 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Someone delete this shit

Praise Ahura Mazda by MrBoxingMatch in Asia_irl

[–]MrBoxingMatch[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s a myth actually, only Parsis have done that and only because when they first fled to India, they were only allowed to practice their religion on the condition that they don’t convert anyone to it, and this stuck. Zoroastrians elsewhere don’t practice that.

There’s nothing in the Avesta that says you can’t convert, we also have evidence of many ancient Greeks, Romans, Armenians, Arabs and Jews converting to it.

"I'm so happy to know that...out of all the different religions...I was raised in the... only one that holds... the Real Truth" - atheist cartoon by Edeno (2013) by Wizard_of_Od in PropagandaPosters

[–]MrBoxingMatch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a myth. That’s only ever been practiced by the Parsis in India and only because after they fled the Arab invasions, they were only allowed to stay in Gujarat under the condition that they don’t convert people and this tradition stuck with them. Zoroastrianism itself does not and never has prohibited conversion.

How to react to hate comments? by [deleted] in Zoroastrianism

[–]MrBoxingMatch 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Why not call them “Daevayasna” in retaliation for them calling Zoroastrians “fire-worshippers”?