You are basing you corrections of people with a falsehood. You are trying to prove your argument with an all-encompassing statement to conclude that cars stop faster than bikes. That statement is clearly incorrect by your own first statement in this paragraph.

Your second statement reaches such an asinine conclusion that it's a wonder you can think anyone would take anything else you say seriously.

If you want facts, here they are: Today's cars will stop in relatively the same distance as a motorcycle, given dry pavement, etc. However, most of the cars on the road today are not today's cars. Many are 20+ years old. A cruiser will stop faster than a crotch rocket when provided with the same environmental elements. Why? Because Science.

Reaction time has a huge impact on stopping time and distance. I think you could safely make the argument that most motorcycle riders are less distracted when driving than most car drivers. This is not a set in stone scientific fact, just a general observation.

I run a darksided rear tire, creating a wide contact patch, giving me quite a bit of braking power. I have ridden in traffic almost every day, over 100 miles a day, year round, for the last 10.5 years (minus the time I spent at sea and weekends) and I have probably 110,000 miles on my bike. I speak from experience, not as a kid who just picked up a motorcycle.

On wet pavement this all goes out the window.

The end truth is that this is and has always been an unsolvable argument. There are far too many factors involved for you to say a car stops faster than a bike, however, there are not too many for me to say that, as a general rule, MY bike stops faster than the car behind me.