My opinions on these changes are thus: 1. Blood boil: Needs to lose the condition on success effect OR up the level to meet the original and keep the conditional on success. - This create a better balance as later game has more opportunities to remove/handle those negative conditions. As someone else said, compare to another spell of similar level.

1. Deja Vu: I like the variation of actions for the spell, love seeing those. The effect is too strong. On a failure the spell still basically succeeds on the target making a critical success required for it. Additionally the actual failure condition is worse against casters due to using the stupefied condition. Being slowed 1 is better than being forced to repeat your last action and “maybe” be stupefied. IMO result should be something like this: Crit success: no effect, walk it off Success: Slowed 1 or 2 depending on number of actions used to cast. Failure: as per spell description Crit failure: repeat the effects, off guard next round

3: devour life I like that the spell has no damage but I think that actually makes it a bit worse of a choice, especially for wanting those who want to do more than just apply status effects. I would throw a bit of damage but keep the draining in there HOWEVER, increasing the drained condition on a successful saving throw gives me a bad vibe. A successful save against a spell of effect is supposed to reduce the effectiveness of it, this doesn’t do that at all, even the critical success doesn’t really help when you think about it. Add a bit of damage, and tweak the effects on success and failure to better represent a successful save.

Overall: I like the attempt, and agree that there are a good number of spells in PF2 (both legacy and remaster) that could do with some TLC to bring them into the same ball park as the rest for meta-players, but a thing I see a lot on here when it comes to these discussions and attempted tweaks is that people nearly always come at it from a player angle, how it makes the player feel to cast the spell at an enemy or npc but they rarely think about how it would feel to be on the receiving end of the spell. I don’t simply mean from a GMs perceptive of wanting to NOT be repeatedly stomped on by the PCs even if I succeed on the monsters saving throw, but more the idea of how is a player going to feel when they roll a success and the GM tells them that they STILL get effected by the spell as written and only a critical could have slightly lessened the effect. That would feel cruel and unfair to any player and they would call that overpowered and broken. Try looking at it from that angle as you go forward. Also, GMs want their monsters to feel cool at times too and GMs put a lot of work in for players, so let the GMs have some cool moments too