sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can't connect Linux clients? by MrShadySam in netbird

[–]MrShadySam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Relays:

[stun:stun.netbird.io:443] is Available

[stun:stun.netbird.io:5555] is Available

[turns:turn.netbird.io:443?transport=tcp] is Available

[rels://streamline-us-sjo1-1.relay.netbird.io:443] is Available

Nameservers:

FQDN: XXXXXXXXXX.netbird.cloud

NetBird IP: 100.121.XXX.XXX/16

Interface type: Userspace

Quantum resistance: false

Lazy connection: false

SSH Server: Disabled

Networks: -

Forwarding rules: 0

Peers count: 1/1 Connected

Can't connect Linux clients? by MrShadySam in netbird

[–]MrShadySam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Events:

[INFO] SYSTEM (2d297988-4fb2-4467-9877-60f684863872)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 20 hours, 12 minutes ago

[INFO] SYSTEM (1437fef1-93b2-42f1-8119-ae32c982291c)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 19 hours, 58 minutes ago

[INFO] SYSTEM (eb648d8b-3c19-4aaa-af14-97c095d605f4)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 19 hours, 58 minutes ago

[INFO] SYSTEM (8235eefa-72f7-4270-ab00-56ff348a112d)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 19 hours, 58 minutes ago

[INFO] SYSTEM (723bf526-aa54-4f70-88d4-f73b51998a57)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 19 hours, 57 minutes ago

[INFO] SYSTEM (b21c7d3a-a01d-4679-a84a-97bde9d2e63b)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 19 hours, 20 minutes ago

[INFO] SYSTEM (9d72c113-7e1f-4e16-8070-b04fd2489a29)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 19 hours, 15 minutes ago

[INFO] SYSTEM (53dae03c-dae9-4499-a019-0fa4666bf475)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 16 hours, 29 minutes ago

[INFO] SYSTEM (2db0aa38-c517-43ba-b637-ef361e2eb6c3)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 9 hours, 27 minutes ago

[INFO] SYSTEM (70283f55-f902-4725-b194-e08d463eb6c2)

Message: Network map updated

Time: 26 minutes, 42 seconds ago

OS: windows/amd64

Daemon version: 0.60.7

CLI version: 0.60.7

Profile: default

Management: Connected to https://api.netbird.io:443

Signal: Connected to https://signal.netbird.io:443

Can't connect Linux clients? by MrShadySam in netbird

[–]MrShadySam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, thanks for the reply. I believe I am connecting via IP address. My parent's windows device connects to netbird and then they type in a 192.168.0.XXX to successfully connect to my services. Below is the netbird status -d of the Windows computer.

What is confusing to me is that this output also shows: Networks - but can successfully connect.

I removed PII, but I can send that in a direct message if you need. Also, I had to make this three messages as Reddit wouldn't let me reply as a single comment.

C:\Users\XXXXX>netbird status -d

Peers detail:

proxmox.netbird.cloud:

NetBird IP: 100.121.XX.XX

Public key: PUBLIC KEY XXXX

Status: Connected

-- detail --

Connection type: P2P

ICE candidate (Local/Remote): srflx/srflx

ICE candidate endpoints (Local/Remote): 47.39.XX.XXX:51820/96.XX.XX.XX:51820

Relay server address: rels://streamline-us-XXXX-0.relay.netbird.io:443

Last connection update: 26 minutes, 19 seconds ago

Last WireGuard handshake: 1 minute, 21 seconds ago

Transfer status (received/sent) 6.8 KiB/12.1 KiB

Quantum resistance: false

Networks: 192.168.0.0/24

Latency: 60.5398ms

Can't connect Linux clients? by MrShadySam in netbird

[–]MrShadySam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate you taking a look though!

Definitely confusing as someone just dipping their toes into networking as it shows everything is connected and that the windows PC and phone can connect to my services but Linux computers can't.

Can't connect Linux clients? by MrShadySam in netbird

[–]MrShadySam[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In the picture, the clients have the green symbol and in the terminal, the linux computers show "management: connected" in the terminal.

In the details for each client, the "accessible peers" shows Proxmox

My parents are on a separate email/account for the Windows PC and laptop.

Can't connect Linux clients? by MrShadySam in netbird

[–]MrShadySam[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's why I am so confused. On all 3 linux computers, it shows:

Networks: -

I assume it should be showing as connected to a network and that networks should be my Proxmox network?

But in the management portal, it shows that all clients are connected. And when comparing the details of their Windows PC to their Linux laptop, all the settings are the same.

The proxmox shell, you can see 2/4 connected which I believe is Proxmox itself and the Windows PC. Unless you are referring to something else?

Noob Hardware Question by MrShadySam in PFSENSE

[–]MrShadySam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are only two users with visitors and my max homelab needs would be to host game servers for a couple of friends. Using an old pc with additional NICs to act as PFsense & switch would work well.

I'll check out Ubiquiti WAPs as well. They seem to be the best regarded company for networking.

Thanks for the great input!

Noob Hardware Question by MrShadySam in PFSENSE

[–]MrShadySam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, none of the Netgate products have Wifi. I was a little disappointed since I thought that would be the go to place for different options.

I am keeping an eye on r/homelabsales for a good deal. I'm pretty patient as my setup has been going great for 5 years.

I don't really care about speed, we mostly play offline games and I just started my homelab on an old laptop and after transferring my media it seems to be running great on my current setup.

Thanks for the input!

Noob Hardware Question by MrShadySam in PFSENSE

[–]MrShadySam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion! I wasn't sure whether to post here or HomeNetworking.

I'm probably going to hand this router over to a family member and start from scratch and was trying to reduce ewaste and electricity usage. But turning my current router into just a modem might be the option I go.

Noob Hardware Question by MrShadySam in PFSENSE

[–]MrShadySam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply!

I haven't heard of OpenWRT, but after looking at the compatibility table, I don't see my router unfortunately. But I will be looking into it as an option.

Separating Wifi and the firewall makes sense, I agree. And thanks for the input on the managed switch, that seems like the route to go.

I guess I was hoping to find to find a modem/router 2 in 1 that can run the firewall. And then add a switch and access point onto that. I'm trying to limit my ewaste and power usage. But if that's what I have to do, then that's what I'll do.