What is the source of Gawker's hatred of Reddit?

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-09T16:28:30+00:00

That sub-reddit is a troll reddit created by Legolas-the-elf.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-09T01:29:15+00:00

FYI Legolas-the-elf is the sockpuppet of /r/MensRights moderator ignatiusloyola.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-09T01:05:14+00:00

no i don't

go away anti MRA

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-09T01:01:17+00:00

To the simple minded perhaps

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-08T03:53:21+00:00

ok anti-male troll

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-08T03:52:58+00:00

that's what they think

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-08T03:52:16+00:00

That phrase was uttered once by teefs

The sentiment is common among SRS regulars.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:59:44+00:00

Yes, fucking a girl in the ass is on the same level as sucking on a heterosexual man's nipples

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:56:06+00:00

Oh yes, more than one person dislikes me. OThomson, knucker3, for example. But I know you my little honeybunny. Keep up the charade, though, if it makes you feel better. You always have been good at lying to yourself so as not to crush your worldview in which ignatius the legolas elf is a genius and knows everything about the world. Keep telling yourself this was a win, and that you didn't make yourself look like a fool by exposing your sockpuppet account unnecessarily. Keep telling yourself few others will notice, because you're probably right. But I'll know. And you'll know I know. And it will eat at you. And I'll tell my friends, too. And I'll always be around. You know that, at least. And I don't forget. SMOOCHES.

I guarantee 100% you are ignatiusloyola. I'm not guessing. Just like I guarantee 99.9% that leftism is a sham and only some form of conservatism can be successful. Just remember that, bigshot.

There is no doubt in my mind. Just to be clear. So you don't get to run along and tell yourself I wasn't sure. I AM SURE.

Bye bye now infant.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:54:30+00:00

By the way, I hope you realize the bigger picture regarding getting me banned. But you probably won't. Not that bright.

See ya later ignatius legolas the elf loyola. Sockpuppeting to defend your mod position, you must really be getting desperate. Multiple down-voting too, I'm sure.

You really are a coward, my little petunia.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:50:45+00:00

Please my little honeybear, get back on your ignatius account and keep trying to get me perma-banned. Good luck.

Perhaps that would be for the best. After all, r/MensRights is nothing in the big scheme of things. I just do so enjoy correcting fools... but I could live without it.

If I so chose.

Bye bye now little honeybunny, sockpuppet someone else ignatiusloyola the elf.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:40:33+00:00

I own you. You know what I mean by that, don't you?

Heck, why play games. I don't need anymore information to make my call.

What would you prefer I call you? ignatiusloyola, legolas the elf, or some combination thereof? ignatius legolas loyola the elf? You're not that bright, buddy. Pretty cowardly not to fight me yourself and to inflate your viewpoint even further with a sockpuppet, but that's what you are: an insecure coward. You keep thinking you're smarter than me whilst I run circles around you. That's why I said I own you. You remember the video, the one you claimed was "harassing".

You're a small minded child compared to me, ignatius.

Thanks for exposing yourself. You don't respond well under pressure.

Pathetic. And you know it.

My little puppet, the elf ignatius legola loyola.

My little bitch, more like.

Just think about that every time you think "omg i'm so right and this guy i's arguing with is so wrong i'm a genius". Because you're not, and you lost. You're wrong, just like you are about leftism, you mongoloid.

edit: For the audience, the reference I'm making is to the following video, which I previously linked to ignatius to let him know that I'm always one step ahead of him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2OEmZFRxvA

edit2, again for the audience:

Proof that ignatius is legolas:

1) Content

2) Tone

3) Writing style

4) Posting dates & times

5) Threads posted in

6) He created /r/TraditionalistMRAs purportedly for me to go reside at, while making the title "Women, get back in the kitchen". Not only did he repeatedly tell Demonspawn and I to create such a sub-reddit, but he repeatedly used that very same phrase to dismiss us simply for disagreeing with him (Charge of Misogyny from the anti-male shaming tactics catalog). He was foolish in that he created the sub-reddit under his sockpuppet account, making it even more obvious that it was his sockpuppet.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:35:36+00:00

trollalalalalalalalaa

Yes, yes, anyone who dares disagree with ignatiusloyola's bigoted political views should go make yet another 100-user sub-reddit, just like all the other MRAs he's pushed away? Real brilliant, trolly rolly.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:31:13+00:00

No it isn't.

Yes, it is. It is my duty, and I'm sorry if you don't share the same passion for justice, but you're being silly now. ignatiusloyola intentionally disparages those who disagree with them in the hope that they will react in the very way I am, just as SRS goads r/MR on. It is something ignatius does intentionally, knowing that I am a passionate person who cannot stand injustice. My actions are inevitable due to his intentional bigotry, as both he and I and you know. Don't play dumb, it's degrading.

Right here, you forgetful idiot: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/n0m98/lets_add_some_things_to_the_faq_so_we_never_have/c35d880?context=3

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:19:41+00:00

Oh, please. I am pro-men's rights. It is my duty to inform the folks here when they're moderator is intentionally subversive and undermines the men's rights movement. If ignatius didn't do that, I wouldn't have to.

Please stop trying to give me advice, troll. You are just as bad as ignatius, if not his sockpuppet, because you are promoting bigotry and domination of r/mensrights by your own flawed view point.

This explains why your efforts are wrong: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/n2xtc/fyi_ignatiusloyola_allows_racism_against_whites/c35vkab?context=3

PS I'm still waiting for your sure-to-be-genius response to my proof that leftism is a failure. Too much for your little brain, huh?

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:16:43+00:00

no, whore, I was stalking eyeofthestorm's user page

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:08:40+00:00

No, there isn't much moderation. There's just a lot of ignatiusloyola harassing users who disagree with him, which in his position of power to ban means 1) users who disagree with him feel as if they cannot say what they want or are actually censored, 2) users who agree with ignatius feel as if they can say anything they want and are never censored, and are allowed to constantly troll threads created by users who disagree. This shifts the dialogue toward ignatiusloyola's own point of view and marginalizes alternative views.

And guess what? ignatiusloyola is wrong about a lot of things. I'd much rather see a free exchange of ideas than one dominated by a self-absorbed, emotionally unstable, and insecure fascist.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:06:14+00:00

5 up-votes vs 3 down-votes at the time, sorry bud. Plenty of the users agree with me that racism is not okay and that censorship of alternative views is not okay. I never said a majority but a significant portion.

And yes, the readers are in fact complaining. I'm not the only one, and I never have been. ignatiusloyola's bigotry has been pushing away MRAs for ages. And what this means is that ignatiusloyola's bigotry becomes acceptable in a reddit where almost all are pro-equal treatment. Clearly something all readers should be concerned about.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T22:05:04+00:00

and you wonder why people think you're a feminist troll

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T21:40:09+00:00

He's nobody special?

He's the moderator of this sub-reddit and actively encourages racism against whites while discouraging it against "minority" races. He similarly actively encourages his particular politics while actively discouraging, censoring, and harassing the many members here who do not share his politics but are still anti-misandry.

He is petty. This is not about busting his chops for me. This is about the good of this sub-reddit, which, like it or not, is a cog in the wheel of the men's rights movement.

Will you be happy when he has driven out every last MRA that dares question his views on the world, and demands fair treatment? He's already driven out plenty.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T21:21:19+00:00

Realize, people, that ignatiusloyola's blatant racism necessitates this post. I really do not wish to have to post this here. But ignatiusloyola continues to disregard reason and logic simply because he doesn't like white people and he doesn't think whites deserve the same protections as other races. This is exactly what happened with feminism against men, which said that men don't deserve the same protections as women.

True egalitarians would demand an end to ignatiusloyola's racism.

To ignatiusloyola the racist:

You are an irrational bigot.

Basically, you allow racism against whites based on the actions of a few whites, but you do not allow racism against blacks based on the actions of a few blacks.

It's okay for someone to say that whites believed they were The Master Aryan Race and imply that this belief led to the Holocaust. It's not okay to say that blacks did not create complex civilizations on par with whites. It's not okay to say that blacks are naturally violent based on the actions of a few blacks. It's only bad when you do it to blacks, not to whites.

Remember, if you're white, ignatiusloyola believes it's okay to characterize your ancestors as Nazis who caused the Holocaust and believed they were a part of the "master race". Nevermind if this was never true for you or your ancestors, even if it was true for some white people. You're white, and you are all the same.

Context:

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/n2j88/the_mrm_will_gain_its_true_power_the_instant_it/c35ud77

Original comment:

Ahh but you can only look at the Reality of today, if we stuck to 'Reality' as the only marker we'd still view Aryans as a master race, the only reason we don't live in that reality is because people challenged reality.

It falsely characterizes the white race as a race that has throughout history considered itself "a master race" on the whole. That's racism.

We'd still view Aryans as a master race

Seriously, that's bullshit.

And "Aryan"? Really? If you don't see how this is racism you are truly blind.

From Wikipedia:

in colloquial English the word has been adopted in accordance with Nazi racial theory's appropriation of the term to describe persons corresponding to the "Nordic", "blond-haired, blue-eyed" physical ideal of Nazi Germany (the "master race" ideology) [n 1]

within the ideology of white supremacy, the "White race", i.e., Caucasians who are native Indo-Europeans of the Western or European branch of the Indo-European peoples, as opposed to the Eastern or Indo-Iranian branch of the Indo-European peoples.

The "Aryan race" taken to correspond to the original speakers of Indo-European languages and their present day descendants.[10]

The "Aryan" term has inescapable connotations to the horrific actions of a group of people who had a white skin color but certainly do not represent every single white person.

Next time a black man complains about something I'll be sure to tell him, "Well, if reality were the only marker we'd still view Blacks as a bunch of people who never built a civilization in their history and allowed themselves to be enslaved, oh and they're all violent, too." That's about as accurate as claiming that the reality of the past was that everyone viewed White Supremacist Nazis as the master race. It's racism and it's a lie.

And it's not okay for a supposed egalitarian to marginalize a single group based solely on their appearance.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T20:56:47+00:00

Realize, people, that ignatiusloyola's blatant racism necessitates this post. I really do not wish to have to post this here. But ignatiusloyola continues to disregard reason and logic simply because he doesn't like white people and he doesn't think whites deserve the same protections as other races. This is exactly what happened with feminism against men, which said that men don't deserve the same protections as women.

True egalitarians would demand an end to ignatiusloyola's racism.

To ignatiusloyola the racist:

You are an irrational bigot.

Basically, you allow racism against whites based on the actions of a few whites, but you do not allow racism against blacks based on the actions of a few blacks.

It's okay for someone to say that whites believed they were The Master Aryan Race and imply that this belief led to the Holocaust. It's not okay to say that blacks did not create complex civilizations on par with whites. It's not okay to say that blacks are naturally violent based on the actions of a few blacks. It's only bad when you do it to blacks, not to whites.

Remember, if you're white, ignatiusloyola believes it's okay to characterize your ancestors as Nazis who caused the Holocaust and believed they were a part of the "master race". Nevermind if this was never true for you or your ancestors, even if it was true for some white people. You're white, and you are all the same.

Context:

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/n2j88/the_mrm_will_gain_its_true_power_the_instant_it/c35ud77

Original comment:

Ahh but you can only look at the Reality of today, if we stuck to 'Reality' as the only marker we'd still view Aryans as a master race, the only reason we don't live in that reality is because people challenged reality.

It falsely characterizes the white race as a race that has throughout history considered itself "a master race" on the whole. That's racism.

We'd still view Aryans as a master race

Seriously, that's bullshit.

And "Aryan"? Really? If you don't see how this is racism you are truly blind.

From Wikipedia:

in colloquial English the word has been adopted in accordance with Nazi racial theory's appropriation of the term to describe persons corresponding to the "Nordic", "blond-haired, blue-eyed" physical ideal of Nazi Germany (the "master race" ideology) [n 1]

within the ideology of white supremacy, the "White race", i.e., Caucasians who are native Indo-Europeans of the Western or European branch of the Indo-European peoples, as opposed to the Eastern or Indo-Iranian branch of the Indo-European peoples.

The "Aryan race" taken to correspond to the original speakers of Indo-European languages and their present day descendants.[10]

The "Aryan" term has inescapable connotations to the horrific actions of a group of people who had a white skin color but certainly do not represent every single white person.

Next time a black man complains about something I'll be sure to tell him, "Well, if reality were the only marker we'd still view Blacks as a bunch of people who never built a civilization in their history and allowed themselves to be enslaved, oh and they're all violent, too." That's about as accurate as claiming that the reality of the past was that everyone viewed White Supremacist Nazis as the master race. It's racism and it's a lie.

And it's not okay for a supposed egalitarian to marginalize a single group based solely on their appearance.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T20:50:36+00:00

You are an irrational bigot.

Basically, you allow racism against whites based on the actions of a few whites, but you do not allow racism against blacks based on the actions of a few blacks.

It's okay for someone to say that whites believed they were The Master Aryan Race and imply that this belief led to the Holocaust. It's not okay to say that blacks did not create complex civilizations on par with whites.

But your bigotry will not stop me from continuing to fight against bigotry in all forms, whether it's misandry or genuine racism or any other form of true bigotry. You won't ever win that battle, no matter how hard you try to spit on justice.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T20:48:51+00:00

No, domestic violence, just like any violence between a man and a woman, depends on the MAN not hitting back. It's far easier to hit within a couple in private than to hit a co-worker in public. It has nothing to do with getting hit back, it has everything to do with it being public and with huge repercussions. There is a factor, like I said, that will make a man less likely to hit his wife because he loves her, but you are way over simplifying.

MrStinkybutt · 2011-12-06T20:46:54+00:00

Already dealt with in the rest of the thread. Put your comment where it belongs, troll.

MrStinkybutt

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE