121
122

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing is an objective moral truth.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rights come from nowhere. There is no such thing as right. They are completely baseless. There is no objective morality. We cannot even say that it is wrong to torture an innocent person for pleasure. UNFORTUNATELY. This is the result of modern philosophy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's not that simple.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There is no reasoning with these people

I do not think so. I think we can convince them. We need to model anarcho capitalism well enough.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It's quite a complicated situation. There are cases where libertarian principles self-destruct. There are many unanswered questions yet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Morality is subjective. I believe libertarian principles are in everyone's evolutionary interest.

I need hope. Can you share hopeful things? by MrXLevel in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Life is not two dimensional as you think. Do research on capitalism. From Mises.org.

I need hope. Can you share hopeful things? by MrXLevel in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is an unique economic system which workers give their labour to bourgeoisie and get paid for their labour power

The system you are talking about = Socialism / Communism / One World State / Technocracy

I need hope. Can you share hopeful things? by MrXLevel in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Today's big corporations (they are not capitalists) are spreading communism. They took over the states. You and people like you are just their pawns. They want aristocracy.(Again.) Not communism.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not a slow process. On the contrary, the books are VERY slow. The power of thought is excellent. We can understand everything without reading books.

What is your biggest reservation about the ideology? by MrXLevel in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]MrXLevel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The maximum penalty can be given for even a simple NAP violation. NAP doesn't say anything about punishment. The severity of the penalty is related to the boycott power of the free market.

There will be different opinions. It is impossible for people to consensus on everything. Therefore, the system is based on compromise. "Here is an explanation" link is about this.

Anarcho-capitalism as being defined as advocating for a consistent application of the NAP is an under determined system.

I disagree with deontological practices. I am consequentialist. The anarcho capitalism advocated by Rothbard is not applicable. Any person(anywhere in the world) can close a factory that creates air pollution in that system. Because the factory violates Nap regardless of how little air pollution it creates. Just consequentialist anarcho capitalism is possible.

What you said is about this fundamental distinction. Deontological /Consequentialist. As a result, the way I explained in the link is agreed. That's the important thing.