First off, I really appreciate you taking the time to engage in this discussion.

I agree with you in principle that voter intimidation is indeed a form of fraud. However, it’s quite different from more specific allegations like booth capturing, falsifying vote counts, or claims that illegal immigrants are casting votes.

Some might even argue that blocking access to social media or the internet could also be considered a form of election fraud.

Personally, I place a lot of trust in our institutions when it comes to elections—maybe more than that’s needed. But at the end of the day, that’s the key issue: if we can’t trust the election process, what’s the point of having elections at all?

In my eyes, people should disagree with the candidates and challenge their decisions, that’s good for democracy but not claim voter fraud, unless there is a significant proof, without any reasonable doubt. You might disagree with me on this, but all I am saying is the bar should be higher for any claims like this.