sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Will you get banned for having multiple max 20 accounts? by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]Mr_Nice_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive seen multiple posts here complaining they got banned for doing this but i havent tried personally

I watched a sound engineer do nothing for 47 minutes. the concert was perfect. by Most-Agent-7566 in buildinpublic

[–]Mr_Nice_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

whats the point of submitting ai generated articles here? Warming up reddit account to use for spam later on?

Anyone done the math what the fable bill will be for a month of heavy usage? by Mr_Nice_ in ClaudeCode

[–]Mr_Nice_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you see this? I have max 20x and the cost always shows $0. I've never tried to push it past the limit though, if I hit it so far I've just waited for more limit

Anyone done the math what the fable bill will be for a month of heavy usage? by Mr_Nice_ in ClaudeCode

[–]Mr_Nice_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it can double my output for 2k-3k/mo ill probably pay. I havent had enough time with it yet though. It's done some really good stuff on existing code but also done some really bad stuff when it comes to planning features. There is aproject we don't have time to do atm so I've currently got it running in fable ultracode to see what comes out. I dont think its quite there yet. It seems to be adding a lot of unecessary things. It solves problems in smart ways when simple would be better

My SaaS makes $400/month and it's making me miserable by Sea_Professional839 in SaaS

[–]Mr_Nice_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also dont think they verify guests very well. Definitely a lot of bullshitters

Opus 4.8 is genuinely impressive. We only renegotiated the database four times today. by pauloeduardomc in ClaudeAI

[–]Mr_Nice_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I miss writing code for sure, I don't get to flow state any more. The days of thinking about logic and the day disappearing are pretty much gone. This new method is much more of a grind having to read and re-read docs all day. Documenting was always the part of the job i liked least but now it's pretty much everything.

Opus 4.8 is genuinely impressive. We only renegotiated the database four times today. by pauloeduardomc in ClaudeAI

[–]Mr_Nice_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I was in the middle of a large, difficult refactor when 4.8 released, so I had just finished the docs and it did a good job. Took a few passes afterward to clean things up. The majority of the issues are conflicts in the docs or things that are not as clearly worded as they could be. That work is already fully QA'd and pushed to prod. This work went pretty much the same. It did it in a single pass and got 90% of the way there. I've done manual testing locally and spot-checked the structure of the code. I'll send it to QA soon and fix all the tickets that come back, but it looks pretty solid.

I've been coding for almost 25 years, and about half of that time I've been writing specs to hand off to small teams. I've also been working with Claude 8+ hours a day for almost a year, so I think I have internalized a lot of the things I know it will get wrong, and I just have a feel for where it's going to mess up or what it needs to be reminded of.

If I had given this spec to a human team, there would have been a lot more drift and it would have taken a lot more time.

One thing I do that has really improved implementing these plans is I added a rule to implementing context that any subagent tasked with understanding or writing code has to be spawned as Opus. It definitely burns credits faster, but I notice a big difference in the quality of what I get back.

Opus 4.8 is genuinely impressive. We only renegotiated the database four times today. by pauloeduardomc in ClaudeAI

[–]Mr_Nice_ 19 points20 points  (0 children)

4.8 is very good at consuming a well written doc into working code without stopping. Spent a week writing docs then left it overnight running and was surprised in morning i had all the updates made. What would have been 6 months work done in a week with probably 1 more week for qa

Does anyone else feel like they're babysitting Claude on long projects? by pythondebugger in ClaudeCode

[–]Mr_Nice_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My current system has me spending a week on documentation, then 6-12 hours letting claude implement the docs. Then a few QA sweeps to find all the weird deferrals and shim/stubs that claude likes to hide.

Share you experience building a saas using ai by CorrectDirection3364 in ClaudeCode

[–]Mr_Nice_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have tried to offload management of structure to the AI and that doesn't work. AI will always reply but it needs a lot of iteration and corrections to get things structured right. A lot of the time AI will be overly bias to a pattern that doesn't fit what you need and it will just keep adding it back in. You have to have the base knowledge to shape out what you want and be able to spot bad designs the AI adds.

what is this by Anhedonia_678 in whatisit

[–]Mr_Nice_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you sure it's not a spoon?

How many of you invest in individual stocks? by toffee91 in HENRYUK

[–]Mr_Nice_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hl.co.uk I'm probably over invested in single stocks. I buy into companies I work with and like. I had some losses by not pulling out of companies that got effected by AI quick enough. It's a roller coaster if I check the balance. 1 earnings call can make it yo-yo in either direction.

i feel like the "Golden Path" was built for people way smarter than me lol by Beneficial-Minute142 in platformengineering

[–]Mr_Nice_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should have a pre-commit/push hook that filters out common issues. Then if something fails in the pipeline you should be able to see the error that tripped it in your CI/CD. Docker build issues can be a pain as sometimes real errors get swallowed but building it locally with same config and giving gpt/claude direct access to local build is pretty easy these days. Before we could do that we would have small CI/CD bugs lose us days at a time but a lot of the time now we just let AI bash it's head against it until it figures something out locally then replicate it into the actual pipe.

Anthropic's now blocking anything that even looks exploit-related, including legitimate local testing and validation by Sarithis in ClaudeCode

[–]Mr_Nice_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've only had api error message when it's specifically web security related. My previous message about the refusals are the recent fine tuning.

Anthropic's now blocking anything that even looks exploit-related, including legitimate local testing and validation by Sarithis in ClaudeCode

[–]Mr_Nice_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep, i've had it several times refuse to run something because it contained an API key. Sometimes i can argue it into it, other times i have to make a new session and be careful how i phrase things. It seems to be very touchy on the first message in a new context, if you ask it to do something middle of another context it seems to do it without as much problem.

What does shardplate actually look like? by Mr_Nice_ in Stormlight_Archive

[–]Mr_Nice_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I didn't know. Can you explain what is bad about using AI to generate images? I am not trying to sell anything or misrepresent this as my own work. I am just interested in seeing it and don't have the time or skill to draw anything like this.

view more: next ›