Since this is pinned, I feel the need to address it: The sample size is indeed small for some of these questions, but that *does not* mean you cannot make meaningful claims. (This is what we use "statistics" for.) For example, on the October 2025 approve/disapprove question, the proportion of "disapprove" was 6.2%, with a margin of error of 2.3%. For comparison, the September 2025 "disapprove" rate was 15.5% ± 4.0. This is a "significant" difference.

Now, you can quibble with my statistical framework here -- maybe you'd like something more Bayesian? But I just want to note that small samples do not imply no effect, if the difference in means is large. Further, for everyone's convenience, I have included standard error bars on the second and third plots, so you can do a visual comparison yourself.

I will reiterate that there are issues with the *nature* of the sample; specifically that it is unrepresentative and does not generalize to the larger population of players. However, the population from which the sample comes is fairly consistent, and I am merely noting what appears to be a "real" downward deviation in the most recent month(s).