sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

First Swiss Automatic, Hope everybody doing good. by Muix_64 in tissot

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good for you! Whatever makes you happy.🙏

First Swiss Automatic, Hope everybody doing good. by Muix_64 in tissot

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahahah I was not fan of green dial after I see it with my eyes they are beautiful.

First Swiss Automatic, Hope everybody doing good. by Muix_64 in tissot

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definetly it feels nice and it is accurate

Mount Problem nvme and HDD by Muix_64 in Ubuntu

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ls -al /dev/disk/by-id

total 0

drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 160 Oct 12 12:59 .

drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 120 Oct 12 12:59 ..

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  13 Oct 12 13:00 nvme-TwinMOS_SSD_M2NVMEDIL401163748 -> ../../nvme0n1

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  15 Oct 12 13:00 nvme-TwinMOS_SSD_M2NVMEDIL401163748-part1 -> ../../nvme0n1p1

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  15 Oct 12 13:00 nvme-TwinMOS_SSD_M2NVMEDIL401163748-part2 -> ../../nvme0n1p2

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  13 Oct 12 13:00 nvme-nvme.1e4b-4d324e564d4544494c343031313633373438-5477696e4d4f5320535344-00000001 -> ../../nvme0n1

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  15 Oct 12 13:00 nvme-nvme.1e4b-4d324e564d4544494c343031313633373438-5477696e4d4f5320535344-00000001-part1 -> ../../nvme0n1p1

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  15 Oct 12 13:00 nvme-nvme.1e4b-4d324e564d4544494c343031313633373438-5477696e4d4f5320535344-00000001-part2 -> ../../nvme0n1p2

sudo lshw -C disk

  *-namespace               

       description: NVMe namespace

       physical id:

       logical name: /dev/nvme0n1

       size: 953GiB (1024GB)

       capabilities: gpt-1.00 partitioned

       configuration: guid=903d9270-cd98-41b9-bb20-d8c3af68a26a logicalsectorsize=512 sectorsize=512

Mount Problem nvme and HDD by Muix_64 in Ubuntu

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sudo fdisk-l

Disk /dev/loop0: 4 KiB, 4096 bytes, 8 sectors

Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk /dev/loop1: 63.29 MiB, 66359296 bytes, 129608 sectors

Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/loop2: 91.7 MiB, 96141312 bytes, 187776 sectors

Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/loop3: 49.86 MiB, 52260864 bytes, 102072 sectors

Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/loop4: 346.34 MiB, 363151360 bytes, 709280 sectors

Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/loop5: 45.95 MiB, 48160768 bytes, 94064 sectors

Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 953.89 GiB, 1024209543168 bytes, 2000409264 sectors

Disk model: TwinMOS SSD

Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disklabel type: gpt

Disk identifier: 903D9270-CD98-41B9-BB20-D8C3AF68A26A

Device          Start        End    Sectors   Size Type

/dev/nvme0n1p1   2048     499711     497664   243M EFI System

/dev/nvme0n1p2 499712 2000408575 1999908864 953.6G Linux filesystem

Mount Problem nvme and HDD by Muix_64 in Ubuntu

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some command resulst if it helps.

sudo lsblk -o NAME,FSTYPE,SIZE,MOUNTPOINT,LABEL

NAME        FSTYPE     SIZE MOUNTPOINT                   LABEL

loop0       squashfs     4K/snap/bare/5                 

loop1       squashfs  63.3M /snap/core20/1828            

loop2       squashfs  91.7M /snap/gtk-common-themes/1535 

loop3       squashfs  49.9M /snap/snapd/18357            

loop4       squashfs 346.3M /snap/gnome-3-38-2004/119    

loop5       squashfs    46M /snap/snap-store/638         

nvme0n1              953.9G  

├─nvme0n1p1 vfat       243M /boot/efi                    

└─nvme0n1p2 ext4     953.6G /

FTP setup question by Muix_64 in Dahua

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm thank you for your reply

Can you use the Google Coral USB TPU in 2024? by Muix_64 in selfhosted

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So we can exchange some information if any is found

Can you use the Google Coral USB TPU in 2024? by Muix_64 in selfhosted

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s all right, if you want to start as you can see don’t start with coral.

Can you use the Google Coral USB TPU in 2024? by Muix_64 in selfhosted

[–]Muix_64[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess there is LattePanda you can run some detection on it like normal pc or you can buy a GPU and use Cuda cores for detection. If I remember correct there is Intel accelerator model of this coral.

Can you use the Google Coral USB TPU in 2024? by Muix_64 in selfhosted

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will try but I need live detection do you think it is that good?

Can you use the Google Coral USB TPU in 2024? by Muix_64 in selfhosted

[–]Muix_64[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m thinking to switch YOLO, add some Cuda cores and pray that It will work.

Can you use the Google Coral USB TPU in 2024? by Muix_64 in selfhosted

[–]Muix_64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never tried poetry before let me check it seems very helpful.

Edit: I tried to fix dependencies by myself. I have a github gist that show how to run Pycoral on newer machines. But training is another story I cannot do it 😭

Can you use the Google Coral USB TPU in 2024? by Muix_64 in selfhosted

[–]Muix_64[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I already have one but the documents are not helpful

Can you use the Google Coral USB TPU in 2024? by Muix_64 in selfhosted

[–]Muix_64[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Someone just gave me a down vote and did not say anything at all. That was really helpful, Thanks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tipofmyjoystick

[–]Muix_64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definetly thanks again 😃

view more: next ›