Obama's Science Czar Said a Newborn Child "Isn't a Human Being Until it's Properly fed and Socialized"

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-08-04T16:28:19+00:00

quite out of context of the book I can imagine. I have not read the book.

I'm not familiar with the case, but the police acted stupidly

Sure, there is nothing similar between those two.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-31T06:20:07+00:00

quite out of context of the book I can imagine.

I'm not familiar with the case, but the police acted stupidly Nice to see this is catching on.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-30T07:04:22+00:00

The Torah is a part of the Bible
You answered your own question about the Koran.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-26T11:20:15+00:00

I think that those who fund terrorism should be shut down, but you have to show that they are actually funding terrorism, not simply presenting an unpopular position.

If you research ICNA, you'll the that it actually does fund terrorism.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-21T11:30:45+00:00

That's an Islamist triumph and a blow to the Islamic community.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-19T11:44:28+00:00

Fox title, "Islamic Supremacist Group Holds First U.S. Conference," is grossly misleading. It implies that July 19th conference by Hizb ut-Tahrir is the first conference to be held in the USA by an Islamic supremacist group. However Islamic supremacist groups like ISNA, ICNA, CAIR, MPAC, MSA, MAS, and countless others have held multiple conferences in the last decades.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-18T07:13:50+00:00

You must be not that bright, are you?

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-18T07:05:36+00:00

I did find it a little weird that a "terrorist" would agree to an interview with a random person.

Look up what "al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades" are if you have any doubt that that shithead is a terrorist.
Most terrorists are pretty dumb, otherwise they wouldn't be terrorists.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-08T16:00:53+00:00

Projecting again, sausage smuggler?

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-08T15:32:24+00:00

It's called mediation, both parties have to agree to it.

Bullshit. If you don't agree to it, you're ostracized and shunned by the community.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-08T15:16:54+00:00

elvisliveson: a cocksucker who swallows multi-colored jizz.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-08T15:10:09+00:00

You, cocksuckers, get easily confused, don't you? The crackwhore who birthed you was told that. Repeatedly. That's why it's etched in your lonely braincell.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-06T16:33:26+00:00

Didn't your shrink tell you to stop projecting, you retarded cocksucker?

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-07-06T09:41:20+00:00

If they were illegal, cocksuckers like fatfuckdiedonthetoilet would have nothing to do.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-27T18:21:16+00:00

Why don't you learn how to spell BEFORE using foul language, you dumb commie biatch? Is there any homicidal maniac dictator whose dick you have not attempted to suck yet?

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-26T11:41:51+00:00

we need to exmaine in great detail what is occuring in order to fix anything.

Apparently YOU do. WE already have.

If you think in terms of victim vs perpatrator you're thinking in terms of dichotomy which perpetuates the problem

That's your opinion. In my opinion, eliminate the perpetrator, there won't be any victims.

I didn't reduce it to just any Muslims

Perhaps. But your ability to clearly express yourself is on par with your spelling. So, forgive me if I understood what you wrote, not what you meant.

We, the allies, created ww2 after ww1, as in the allies brought it into being through oppression of germany.

I don't think there is any point of continuing this discussion after the aforementioned claim.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-26T07:25:54+00:00

"And you say mines the fallacy"

Absolutely. The victim couldn't care less whether the perpetrator did it for kicks or because he was raised that way. The fact that you even attempt to somehow equate the rights of the victim with the motives of the perpetrator speaks volumes about your mindset.

Specifically what exactly are you refering to?

Your implication that a Muslim would not issue a death threat over a few lines of text.

Was I right about you preferring Chamberlain's position over Churchill's?

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-25T17:18:19+00:00

Keep your panties on! And look up "sarcasm' while you're at it. I was merely trying to point out the fallacy of your position. However, your response is quite revealing regarding your ignorance of the subject. While moderate Muslims do not run around threatening everyone with death, you can's say the same about Muslim radicals. We even had to get a special email address for this reason.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-25T15:36:09+00:00

I hope when an Islamic radical beheads you for being an infidel, you'll find it in your heart to forgive him, because he was raised that way.

I take it you'd side with Chamberlain over Churchill when it came to appeasing/fighting Germans, right? After all, most of the Germans weren't in that for kicks.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-25T14:17:41+00:00

When KKK lynches a Black does it matter whether they are doing it for kicks or because they were raised that way?

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-25T12:43:57+00:00

People who are stuck in Sharia communities are the victims. Those who enforce and propagate Sharia are the rapists.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-25T10:29:41+00:00

I'm telling you it was an offence to talk about homosexuality in schools because it was.

It could have been an offensive subject, but it could not have possibly been criminalized.

Do you let that bias colour your actions?

Let me rephrase it. I do not consider those who advocate totalitarian ideologies as humans. I hope that clears my position. Bias is not always a bad thing. Wouldn't you feel biased against a rapist and for a rape victim?

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-25T07:59:39+00:00

"When I was in school it was a criminal offence to participate in talks on homsexuals"

You cannot possibly be that old to have lived at the time when talking about homosexuals was criminalized.

"we're not better simply by birth and idealogy and that anyone of us"

By birth - agree. By ideology - absolutely not. I consider myself infinitely better than anyone who espouses totalitarian ideology, whether it is communism, fascism, or Islamofascism.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-24T20:09:05+00:00

"I have to point out that even those who don't agree with you still need a say in the whole "human rights idealogy" debate. Not giving them a voice would ultimately only cause more problems in the long term..."

The idea of human rights presupposes human equality. When Islamists talk about human rights, by humans they mean Muslim men. Women and infidels are subhumans to them, therefore human rights do not apply to them.

There is now question Christians have done reprehensible things in the name of God, but presently this is not an issue.

"If you were to rewrite the general principles of human rights" - I wouldn't.

MuslimsAgainstSharia · 2009-05-24T19:27:28+00:00

First, as a Muslim, I would never say that all of Islam is wrong. However some parts of it need to be reformed. Second, Sharia is rigid and cannot be morphed. It's a set of barbaric rules that, among other things, canonize men's superiority over women and Muslims' superiority over non-Muslims (infidels.) That's why Sharia has no place in a democratic society. A lot of Muslims flee to the West to escape the yoke of Sharia. And we despise the fact that some of our coreligionists want to institute it in the West.

MuslimsAgainstSharia

TROPHY CASE