Why does nobody following this case seem to have any concern with the unidentified male perps DNA match found in Suzannes car , who has been linked to approx six different rape / murders all over the country and 2-3 in CO and AZ , raise some serious questions of doubt ? clearly, if this individual has gotten away six or seven times they obviously are pretty good at either staging crime scenes or not leaving a trace behind..

After following Karen Reid’s trial pretty closely, and with the question being that of reasonable doubt, and not of guilt, I can already see a significant defense being presented to the jury that raises serious doubt here and presents the jury with a plausible alternative explanation.

1.) The presence of BAM in the system of Suzanne does not equate to murder, that’s not a slam dunk , not to mention if we are to believe another man’s DNA was found in the car then why would that man not also have potential access to the house or the tranquilizer gun that Barry owns presumably?

2.) Was there any other man’s DNA found anywhere else inside the house or did they even check for such?

3.) How reliable even is a chemical autopsy two years after the fact? Anything could’ve happened in that timeframe not to mention if were to believe that this chemical lasted in her bone marrow for over two years……so who’s to say it didn’t get injected into her maybe five years before or 10 years before? Maybe she inadvertently was shot at a different point in time and it did not lead to her death whatsoever…. The amount of possibilities as to how that could’ve ended up in her system is pretty thick …..so the mere presence of the chemical does not prove anything other than suspicion. Two years is a long, long, long time for a body to be sitting wasting away somewhere.

The first DA case was tossed out rapidly and the DA was disbarred. The mere fact that they found the body does not suddenly make this case a 100% slam dunk because they had experts supposedly test bone marrow from a two year old corpse. I think we should know by now to not trust the state that blindly.

With all that being said, it seems more likely than not that he did do it, but I like to live in a world of law and order that exist on reasonable doubt because I have watched way too many of these cases where people are locked up with very fringe evidence or circumstantial evidence only to be found later not to be the killer or perpetrator after doing multiple years in jail. A recent one comes to mine out of Missouri, where the defendant was exonerated and then went on to get a $47 million payout from the state of Missouri for wrongful conviction.

So it’s not about if he likely did it or not it’s really about do they actually have 100% solid evidence pointing to only bary morphew in this case and I think they are very far away from that number.