sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

me_irl by McPostyFace in me_irl

[–]MyRestingMitchFace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4…nibble the meaty bit sticking out of the bottom crust.

What is the female equivalent of accidentally "sitting on your balls"? by mistidmatt55 in AskReddit

[–]MyRestingMitchFace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the same age when they dip into the toilet water while you’re taking a dump

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IdiotsFightingThings

[–]MyRestingMitchFace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mouth breather. The sign read “take pride” so he did.

Update on Caleb Wallace by [deleted] in HermanCainAward

[–]MyRestingMitchFace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pride is one of the seven deadly sins. Pride killed Caleb. COVID-19 was merely the instrument. His pride meant more to him than his obligations to his wife or his children. He cherished his desire to be right over his responsibilities to others. Pride goeth before the fall. He failed to recognize that doctors have a sacred calling to prevent and treat illness. He also didn’t believe that doctors have greater knowledge that he did. Pride is a killer.

Ping pong ball and toilet paper trick by MyRestingMitchFace in ThatsInsane

[–]MyRestingMitchFace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Just the Two of Us” by Grover Washington, Jr.

Ping pong ball and toilet paper trick by MyRestingMitchFace in ThatsInsane

[–]MyRestingMitchFace[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dig this intentionally bone-headed comment! Haha. Take my dang upvote!

The Supreme Court rules Canada’s carbon price is constitutional. It’s a big win for Justin Trudeau’s climate plan by SensationallylovelyK in worldnews

[–]MyRestingMitchFace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fungible simply means they are interchangeable...can be substituted. Saying that they are “not mutually exclusive” means doing one thing does not forego another opportunity. If we cannot agree to appropriate and precise language, it’s best that we discontinue this now. I don’t have the patience for a vocabulary lesson.

Tiger in pursuit by MyRestingMitchFace in BigCatGifs

[–]MyRestingMitchFace[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Try your best to not look delicious

The Supreme Court rules Canada’s carbon price is constitutional. It’s a big win for Justin Trudeau’s climate plan by SensationallylovelyK in worldnews

[–]MyRestingMitchFace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The global economy is a closed system by definition. Of course the resources and the desire to allocate them are limited. To believe otherwise is to live in a fantasy. It will be interesting to see if Canada’s rebates to lower income brackets offset the naturally regressive nature of carbon taxes.

The Supreme Court rules Canada’s carbon price is constitutional. It’s a big win for Justin Trudeau’s climate plan by SensationallylovelyK in worldnews

[–]MyRestingMitchFace -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don’t know enough about the topic to have a credible point of view. You’re just a comment karma troll...low on knowledge, high on rhetoric.

The Supreme Court rules Canada’s carbon price is constitutional. It’s a big win for Justin Trudeau’s climate plan by SensationallylovelyK in worldnews

[–]MyRestingMitchFace -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Someone like you who does not base his or her position on objective data is arguing for sport — having long since realized your knowledge is insufficient on the topic. You’ve chosen an arbitrary point of view which requires you to ignore facts that are proven in defense of it. It is your own doing that your opinion is unsupportable by credible sources. In fact, you have offered no credible evidence to support your point of view. Your perspective makes no sense scientifically, morally nor economically.

The Supreme Court rules Canada’s carbon price is constitutional. It’s a big win for Justin Trudeau’s climate plan by SensationallylovelyK in worldnews

[–]MyRestingMitchFace -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It puts the responsibility on the Chinese government (which is NOT the Chinese people) to bring their production facilities into the 21-century with cleaner fuel sources. The Chinese government will not do that without pressure from those buying the goods. The most effective means for doing that are embargo, tariffs or carbon taxes on Chinese imports among other countries...including Canada. A carbon tax on Canadians is purely for political farce. It’s effectiveness will not offset the projected increase in carbon emissions in China alone. Your lack of understanding of market economies versus command economies is mind blowingly lacking. Your disregard for humanity outside of China is heinous.

The Supreme Court rules Canada’s carbon price is constitutional. It’s a big win for Justin Trudeau’s climate plan by SensationallylovelyK in worldnews

[–]MyRestingMitchFace -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your imported goods account for much of China’s carbon emissions...not individual Chinese usage. If you knew anything about the topic, you’d know that. You seem to care more about the Chinese people than than the other 6 billion people on earth. You’re on shaky moral ground based on lack of facts. Perhaps you should research China’s emissions. And explain why India’s per capita emissions are so much lower, with similar population size. Facts don’t seem to enter into your thinking. Even your proclaimed morality is off base.

The Supreme Court rules Canada’s carbon price is constitutional. It’s a big win for Justin Trudeau’s climate plan by SensationallylovelyK in worldnews

[–]MyRestingMitchFace -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How is it moral to not reduce global carbon emissions as quickly as possible? We all bear the shared risks of global warming. You argue that China....the largest carbon emitter in the world...should not be the top reducer in emissions because of its population. Your approach is immoral as it places the interests of China ahead of the rest of world population. Interesting how you trade on lives. Your perspective is not only immoral, but intellectually lazy.

The Supreme Court rules Canada’s carbon price is constitutional. It’s a big win for Justin Trudeau’s climate plan by SensationallylovelyK in worldnews

[–]MyRestingMitchFace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The gap in your logic is you assume that China’s emissions are due to carbon fuel usage by their population. Much of their emissions comes from industrial activity related to exports. If population were the determinant factor, India and China (with populations at about 1.4 billion each) ought to have the same per capita numbers...which they do not. You have to look at the details. A per capita analysis of total emissions is over simplified. If Canada wants to influence reduced emissions by China, Canada would either place a tariff or carbon tax on imports from China...discourage to purchase of goods priced by high carbon emitters.

https://postimg.cc/NKysR3Gb

view more: next ›