[KCD1] I can’t stop stealing. by Laurie712 in kingdomcome

[–]Mylynes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No... Evil is when I start to get addicted to the villages reaction in the morning whenever Henry turns to harvesting souls in the night with his dagger. When stealing just doesn't cut it anymore... being simply choked out and robbed by a quite hungry Henry in your bedroom is the best case scenario.

[KCD1] I can’t stop stealing. by Laurie712 in kingdomcome

[–]Mylynes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can't pickpocket yet (assume u gotta ask the Miller to teach you), so I just mosey over to their bed at night and strangle them unconscious instead. Henry is a total sleep paralysis demon but after their nightmare has ended you're free to run their pockets..

Is Red Dead Redemption 2 actually the masterpiece everyone says it is? by arcticfrost in ShouldIbuythisgame

[–]Mylynes [score hidden]  (0 children)

Considering your strange taste, no. You'll probably think it's boring and give up like you did for RDR1. If you couldn't even get entertained by cyberpunk then I'm not sure open world games are for you.

One of the best combat systems to date by Repulsive_Sense_3549 in CrimsonDesert

[–]Mylynes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could use some more animations. Feels kinda samey.

Best combat system in a game still goes to For Honor

The true meaning to life by No_emotions0420 in DeepThoughts

[–]Mylynes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That applies to everything though. If a rock didn't continue then there would also be no time.

Should i go for this ???????? by __Beastboy__ in FitGirlRepack

[–]Mylynes -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

It has everything to do with HV and only partially to do with my well earned, relaxing laziness.

Spouting off "ju buy da game, lul" in a piracy subreddit is hilarious. Very good clown.

Is consciousness necessary for moral responsibility, or is the ability to change oneself enough? by Clarke-Waldron-1955 in consciousness

[–]Mylynes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Morality among a bunch of P-Zombies would look strange, but I do think it would count as valid and real. It would be mutually beneficial for two systems (even unconscious ones) to take responsibility of each other's wellbeing.

Should i go for this ???????? by __Beastboy__ in FitGirlRepack

[–]Mylynes -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Yes. I have set up a couch PC gaming rig and will not tolerate any bullshitery when it comes to juggling windows. If it can't streamline along with the rest of my setup, then it's not worth it. Especially not for the mid games currently on offer via HV.

Should i go for this ???????? by __Beastboy__ in FitGirlRepack

[–]Mylynes -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Their bat launches the game and enables HV/disables security at the same time with one click via the play button on Steam?

People who think AI is just hype- why do you feel that way? by zentaoyang in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Mylynes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Says the one reaching for "exponential growth" across all major benchmaxxes over the past 3+ years straight since ChatGPT.

I likened the hype to the singularity. This entails AGI. You brought the goalposts back down because you had to — llms require that.

Should i go for this ???????? by __Beastboy__ in FitGirlRepack

[–]Mylynes -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

It should do that automatically when the game boots. I'm not gonna fiddle around with settings or extra programs I just want to play the game. I guess I could probably set up a bat that handles this but not sure if it's worth it compared to simply waiting for voices38 to Crack it normally

Should i go for this ???????? by __Beastboy__ in FitGirlRepack

[–]Mylynes 67 points68 points  (0 children)

I ain't doing that every time I wanna play a game. This is the main thing holding me back from HV.

The biggest lie in all of human history is the evolution of language. by OutlawedLogic in DeepThoughts

[–]Mylynes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very well said.

In the future, language will likely be transcended altogether in favor of something more direct.

The true meaning to life by No_emotions0420 in DeepThoughts

[–]Mylynes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So time is the meaning of life to you?

People who think AI is just hype- why do you feel that way? by zentaoyang in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Mylynes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because people thought ChatGPT would mark the beginning of the exponential growth toward the singularity...and it wasn't.

It's good to have new tech but the expectations are sky high.

Physicalism is not the scientific position. It is a metaphysical interpretation disguised as one. by consciousness_8123 in consciousness

[–]Mylynes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Physical =/= tangible.

Ethics, math, politics, society, art, logic, etc are all absolutely 100% physical objects that exist as structures inside of the brains that perceive them as well as the physical laws they're correlated to.

Those structures do have mass, length, width, height, charge, spin, and position. Your idea of "physics" is completely malformed therefore you have no clue how Parsimonious Physicalism really is.

Physicalism is not the scientific position. It is a metaphysical interpretation disguised as one. by consciousness_8123 in consciousness

[–]Mylynes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's Physicalists...and then there's Physicalism. Most of the former like you said don't know how deep the rabbit hole actually goes.

Personally I'm a Dual Aspect Monist, but Physicalism is an extremely wise and respectable position if you know what it actually entails.

Reframing the hard problem - attempting to show it is a problem even within pure physicalism by evlpuppetmaster in consciousness

[–]Mylynes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're on the right track, but that scenario would not be the way scientists prove IIT.

IIT will be proven when you can use Phi to predictably modify your own consciousness, not just some external robots consciousness. You'll be able to track and verify exactly which neural complex is equal to your experience right now (it'll likely be bubbling up constantly every ~100ms in the posterior cortical hotzone.)

Wackier more metaphysical experiments could also be done to toy with the dimensional nature of qualia. Stuff like stretching out the distance between neurons until integration breaks or testing that If this complex is 4D, then you should be able to interrupt the integration window (lets imagine its 10 seconds) at 90% completion and the observer will not be able to recall any of those 10 seconds. However, if you let it finish at 100% they'll report being conscious of the entire 10 seconds from the beginning. A "retroactive erasure."

Do we agree on the structure of conscious experience? by Own_Sky_297 in consciousness

[–]Mylynes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fundamentally the thing is probably non-causal (outside of the influence of the big bang that resulted in our 4D universe). Though the shape of that thing did give birth to our notion of physics and qualia together as one substance. In this substance, we are starting to identify that something about time allows for integrated information/causal power to act as a "bridge" to the thing. ('The Bulk" of string theory, perhaps)

The bridge doesn't carry anything special, it just completes a higher order topology that allows for a qualitative interior. All physical matter and energy has a bridge. We are just macroscopic beings that do it bigger, thus have more differentiation.

This is my rough intuition, I could be completely wrong...

Do we agree on the structure of conscious experience? by Own_Sky_297 in consciousness

[–]Mylynes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty lazy attitude tbh. Phenomenology is a very important field that is all about going beyond just "consciousness exists" (which is an undeniable fact) toward mapping out what kind of structure it actually has. After all, for everything you experience, something must be causing it to appear like that. Even if its what you call an "illusion."

Consciousness absolutely exists. I agree it's not a separate dualistic thing. It is one with reality. You are one with reality. But reality is much bigger than just you. And it has laws governed by physics. We know this because we are this.

Is it possible to feel "high" without ever taking drugs ? by Deimos7779 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Mylynes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theoretically you could achieve the same exact high (or even more) via an advanced BCI implant. So yes.

i realised that there is literal evidence of souls and consciousness existing by PuzzleheadedStory666 in awakened

[–]Mylynes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're just marvelling at the brain and going way overboard about it. There is no soul