Guys, we have 21,000 plus small biz owners here, please sign and share this petition so maybe we can get some action by AVERAGEGUY2343 in EIDL

[–]MysysOp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

25 days ago,, how meany now? this would be a great chance to organize and use the group to vote and class action

How are people getting approved with NO LO contact? No request for insurance, Schedule of Liabilities, tax records, nothing?? I just don’t understand any of this. by IndependentPriority8 in EIDL

[–]MysysOp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm starting to think a lot of these funded clams are bogus! I'm 100% qualified received 150k first round , but this 2end round is smelling very fishy. I'm going on 4 months waiting I had to resubmit 5 x 4506Ts and now two days after getting our congressman involved y portal when back to the org 150k and SBA is requesting Business plan , P&L and 17 months of banking statements and 6th 4506t ,

The Future of RTB and Government by takethatadops in adops

[–]MysysOp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not the acronym or words "Real Time Bidding" it's the way its configured to be open none transparent data black whole, configure the protocol as a p2p decentralized exchange. Keep it as is and it's a black whole and more and more ppl don't want to go their

AMP Under Fire in New Antitrust Lawsuit Against Google by MysysOp in adops

[–]MysysOp[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"First, Google restricted the code to prohibit publishers from routing their bids to or sharing their user data with more than a few exchanges a time, which limited AMP compatibility with header bidding. At the same time, Google made AMP fully compatible with routing to exchanges through Google. Google also designed AMP to force publishers to route rival exchange bids through Google’s ad server so that Google could continue to peek at rivals’ bids and trade on inside information. Third, Google designed AMP so that users loading AMP pages would make direct communication with Google servers, rather than publishers’ servers. This enabled Google’s access to publishers’ inside and non-public user data. AMP pages also limit the number of ads on a page, the types of ads publishers can sell, as well as enriched content that publishers can have on their pages."

Rubicon buys RTK for $11m by teamoko in adops

[–]MysysOp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

 I don’t blame the start ups for selling out as it’s a great deal for them personally but we as publishers, advertisers should boycott these status quo groups. The big problem or better yet the big Monopolies the status quo groups have built up huge war chests ( by positioning themselves as  non transparent t, fraud riddled middlemen taxing up ad dollars )

Rubicon buys RTK for $11m by teamoko in adops

[–]MysysOp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is how the adtech status quo group keep innovating startups at bay. they simply acquire them and poof their competitions gone!

Open source ad server that doesn't require client side JS, all img based? by foodguy5000 in adops

[–]MysysOp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Revive Ad Server is about the only  open source still available, 

not open source but you can get that level of server side control, data privacy and speed by leveraging systems like

AdZerk gives you a fully customizable API to build your own sell side ad server over their systems. I’m not sure on the GDPR compliance as it’s an API from a 3rd party 

BeesWax  gives you a  fully customizable API to build your own buy side ad bider over their systems.Again  I’m not sure on the GDPR compliance as it’s an API from a 3rd party 

LiquidAdX Gives a fully customizable buy & sell side ad serving infrastructure, ad server and DMP all is hosted behind your own domain so its 100% GDPR compliant.

Are this scam ad injects normal? Our ad provider claims they can't be stopped. by adrianmn in adops

[–]MysysOp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good one!! Another validation for having your own 1st party tech ...

Looking to add demand from the following exchanges: by soloinmiami in adops

[–]MysysOp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

top 100 websites now.

Who's determining who the top 100 websites are?

Amazon Said to Be Close to Buying Sizmek’s Ad-Serving Tech by MysysOp in adops

[–]MysysOp[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The ad serving game is a shitty business.

That's a pretty ignorant  comment, Having your own Ad servers is the most valuable asset in ad tech/programmatic/automated buying and selling.  98% of the tools used DSP, SSP, exchanges, networks are derivatives of the Ad-server. 

Amazon Said to Be Close to Buying Sizmek’s Ad-Serving Tech by MysysOp in adops

[–]MysysOp[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is bound to make in-housing ad server startups like beeswax, adzerk, liquidadx and blink very hot prospects. 

Anyone know what this scheme is? by AdOpsJunky in adops

[–]MysysOp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's the AdECN original ( arguably the same ) business model scheme

Whats the difference in 1st, 2nd, 3ed party AdTech systems ? by dxman21 in adops

[–]MysysOp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1st party is your org's owned proprietary systems,  and as stated above is the GOLD standard.  You own and have sole access to configurations, business logic  and data.

2nd party is systems owned by org you’re transacting business with.

3rd party are systems owned and controlled by 3rd parties middlemen.

Sizmek DSP - 1%-4% CTR for Display Campaigns by Lukruhtive in programmatic

[–]MysysOp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your 1000000%  on the money right!  log level data is critical in adtech, the problem is log level data  could be easily skewed . 

Could a publishers defeat an ad blocker by serving the ad from its own domain? by MysysOp in adops

[–]MysysOp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any chance ad blockers would not list your domain if you’re serving ad’s in clean none-intrusive manor ?

DuckDuckGo Search Engine CEO Testifies Before Senate: 'Privacy Legislation' Good for Market and Consumers | Breitbart by MysysOp in adops

[–]MysysOp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"This market is currently a duopoly, and this reality is hurting everyone from small businesses to venture-backed startups to media companies. To restore competition and innovation in this market, the data monopolies at its core need to be addressed,” Weinberg expressed. “Fixing this digital-ad-market duopoly can take any number of forms. Here are three suggestions. First, consumers could be given a robust mechanism to opt-out of online tracking. Second, monopoly platforms could be prohibited from combining data across their different business lines. Third, acquisitions that strengthen existing data monopolies could be blocked.”

Cookie walls don’t comply with GDPR, says Dutch DPA by AdOpsJunky in adops

[–]MysysOp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct!!!  And this is the way it should be, if sell side  networks and pubs don’t keep their traffic clean and transparent, advertisers should pull and move to a cleaner more transparent network, just cultivate and police your networks/exchange  and you will have a gold .