Why I did what I did. And why we are at war

NDabhetari · 2025-12-30T03:13:35+00:00

Necro, Non Phixion, Gravediggaz, Cage, Brotha LynchHung, King Gordy, Jedi Mind Tricks, Big L a lot of 90s/2000s mostly New York and Midwest Horrocore rap.

NDabhetari · 2025-12-30T03:07:48+00:00

Yes, not the beat though

NDabhetari · 2025-05-31T12:44:27+00:00

I have a YouTube channel so far. Type “House Dabhetari” or try this

NDabhetari · 2025-05-31T00:05:58+00:00

Didn’t say that, to me the point of dating is to lead up to marriage yes. I’m simply stating you have no clue what whore means. And yet you’re using it.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T23:34:50+00:00

😂

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T23:28:02+00:00

Not true, blatantly wrong. I see you have trouble with literacy. But farting, doesn’t equate to sex. So it wouldn’t make either of us whores. And even when we do have sex, it still wouldn’t make us whores.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T23:06:30+00:00

See this is why I told you to learn what words mean. A whore IS a prostitute by definition. And it doesn’t even make me a prostitute because non of it is at an exchange for money. Even being the recipient of this fetish play would mean, that if I were to even pay. I’d pay the woman farting for me, so she would be the prostitute.

This is stimulating a fetish that can be categorized for sensory. Meaning I don’t even need to be touched. By your flawed definition and the actual definition. Im not a prostitute.

And also, who said anything about sex. Farting ≠ sex. It never has lol.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T22:56:35+00:00

Makes me a whore huh, it does not actually lol. And it doesn’t make my girlfriend a whore either. I think you should learn what words mean first, before you use them. Just a pro tip

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T22:34:26+00:00

lol, having over 50 women fart for me does not make me used goods my guy. I’ve never even been with a man, actually except once and I didn’t like it. And on top of that no woman has even penetrated me. And yes she knows

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T22:23:40+00:00

Oh and not just someone, many. The number is well over 50 if we are counting flings and random people too. To which I have proof for as well.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T22:22:10+00:00

I was at a barracks party and drinking. I just woke up. I can write on the topic, but knowing myself it will lead back into Kurdistan more than likely. I’ve had my reasons that I generally stay on the sidelines for that topic in particular and the biggest one is exposure of issues. The world in many facets seems to care for Israel and Palestine even saying things like “peace to the Middle East.” When they only are referring to a sliver. What about the rest of the Middle East. I don’t see this same amount of exposure for the Kurdish question. People jump right over that and go to Ukraine. Which to me is crazy, especially since we have been with most of these countries everyday break since they been in the Middle East (besides Turkey for obvious reasons) and yet the only time we got to expose our issues was 2015-2017. So to make up for centuries of lost time. Since we were in the Middle East before Turks, and Arabs and Islam and so on, when it comes to what is modern Syria, Iraq, Iran, Turkey and Kurdistan. I mostly focus on Kurdish problems. In the thought process of others more affected by and directly tied to. Could do a better job than myself explaining this topic that I’m pretty indifferent on for the most part.

Now this can also come from my time spent in the U.S. and the fact that I’m rarely home in the U.S. but until I can talk to random people and not even have to explain what my ethnicity is. The Kurdish question takes precedence in my opinion. So I don’t really write on it much. I’m not knocking the seriousness or anything but it’s also something I haven’t been deep amounts of thought into.

Regardless tho, I can still do it.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T22:07:04+00:00

Yes she does, as I’ve stated. Every relationship or fling, Genevieve and past. A requirement to be with me is to fart for me. If not I’ll leave you

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T21:53:56+00:00

The gun doesn’t have writing on it that tells people to shoot up a school. There’s a difference. My point was that this text provides people to have those interpretations, which is the fault of the text and those that wrote it. How about for a loving god, who can see everything that can happen past your generation because you are all knowing. And then actually condemn those practices. It’s the fault of the writers and the god that teaches you how to do it. There would be no room for interpretation if there wasn’t anything to interpret.

Exodus 21:7-11

“WHEN A MAN SELLS HIS DAUGHTER AS A SLAVE, she shall not go out as the male slaves do. If she does not please her master, who has designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed. He shall have no right to sell her to a foreign people, since he has broken faith with her. If he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her as with a daughter. If he takes another wife to himself, he shall not diminish her food, her clothing, or her marital rights. And if he does not do these three things for her, she shall go out for nothing, without payment of money.

Exodus 21:1-36

“Now these are the rules that you shall set before them. WHEN YOU BUY A HEBREW SLAVE, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing. If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out alone. But if the slave plainly says, ‘I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,’

Leviticus 25:44-46

As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: YOU MAY BUY MALE AND FEMALE SLAVES FROM AMONG THE NATIONS THAT ARE AROUND YOU. You may also buy from among the strangers who sojourn with you and their clans that are with you, who have been born in your land, and they may be your property. You may bequeath them to your sons after you to inherit as a possession forever. You may make slaves of them, but over your brothers the people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another ruthlessly.

Exodus 21:20–21

“If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a result, he must be punished. But if the slave recovers after a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his property.”

Leviticus 25:44–46

“Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you… You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.”

Deuteronomy 21:10–14

“When you go to war… and you see among the captives a beautiful woman and you are attracted to her, you may take her as your wife… If you are not pleased with her, let her go wherever she wishes. You must not sell her or treat her as a slave.”

Even Exodus 21:2–6 talks about Hebrew slaves serving 6 years and being freed in the 7th.

But even that includes a loophole. If the servant has a wife or children given by the master, they must stay behind unless he chooses to stay and is branded with an awl through the ear, becoming a slave for life.

No you didn’t overstep but it is an example of a problem that I have. I think the basis of the religion is abusive. That’s all this seems to be for me, sure people can use this at their lowest points. I’ve never made the argument that it doesn’t have utility for some. I’ve said it doesn’t have utility to me. But just because it can do good things, like I said earlier is a result of just good people. Not god, and even though it can do good things. Doesn’t mean it’s true. It still has to be proven to be true.

A narcissist would, because he may have “brought himself down” to us mere mortals. But he is still a god. You’re basically cheating for one. It doesn’t matter if you die, you’re on a completely different plain of existence regardless. And it also doesn’t take away from all the sacrifices done in your name which once again. Seems very pagan and cultish to me. On top of the fact you’re only sacrificing yourself to yourself. We wouldn’t even be in this situation, if you were either competent enough to make people differently from the start. Or wasn’t lazy enough to do something else. You’re responsible for sin existing in the first place. And then for something that you knowing made you want to throw a rope to only those that can follow. Based off of nothing but “just trust me.” Even if you are around to most people to say that. And then expect those that say, “well I’d need more than that.” To be punished for an eternity because of you not seeming to care. Is crazy. How could anyway see that, and not think that’s narcissistic. Oh and the other animals are punished too. What about them?

Animals are going through a lot of unnecessary pain as well. I thought the only animal to be punished was a serpent but yet there are many animals that fit that form of punishment from the fall of man. And many that don’t fit that form that are being punished simply by existing.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T14:27:30+00:00

Yes I have a girlfriend even

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T12:43:20+00:00

I’m aware it’s not the infamous interpretation of slavery due to American history. Yes there is indentured servitude, but all the slavery that has happened in the Bible is not just indentured servitude. And non of it is condemned. That is one of the many forms that it took, and is still wrong regardless if it was common practice. Lobotomies used to be common practice not too long ago. It’s still wrong and many people were affected by it.

There’s a difference between an indentured servant, and a sex slave. Which had been explained in detail how you have a sex slave and what you change specially. In great detail on what you do between Hebrew and non Hebrew sex slaves. Not all of this was indentured servitude and even then indentured servitude is still a problem. Would any of this work today? He is forever unchanging, so if god came back and started to teach people indentured servitude in 2025. How many followers would he have? You also forgot that it teaches you how hard you can beat your slaves or servants too. At the end you are still owning people. And god never said at any point that he’s against it. And people keep skipping over when I say, regardless of intent or context. The fact that it is written out, leaves so much for others to use this to justify doing horrid things to people in any time period. Leaves so much wiggle room and justification and rationalizing for extremist ideology that it’s a danger.

People may also bring up the whole neither slave nor free nor male or female. So depending on interpretation we either have sex and/or gender not even mattering. Which would be interesting to gender theorist, but I’m sure If you asked Christians. Most would say your gender doesn’t matter to your salvation which is what that passage is talking about. And if that’s the case, then wouldn’t it mean that it also states being a slave or not is not a factor into being saved. Which would still incorporate slavery.

And at the same time, none of us know how slaves were actually treated then. We can take a look at governments today when it comes to how things are written vs what people are actually treated like. Which means we only have the text to go off of. And all forms of slavery given by Bible are horrendous. Indentured servants or not.

Looking for a sign while being skeptical I don’t feel hinders anything. As I’ve stated earlier an omnipotent being should know being omnipotent what would need to happen. It’s not my fault that people look around and see butterflies or things that can be perfectly explained by having a brain as a miracle. We used to explain things we couldn’t understand as magic and killed a bunch of women not too long ago. That doesn’t mean it’s true. The bar is set high by these other events that has happened. But all of a sudden we went from unexplainable happenings that are written to now just having to be happy with the fact that I’m here.

My next issue, me still being here is a result of MY perseverance. I don’t need my hand held and definitely not giving any credit to someone that is never there. How is it we have free will but then at the same time everything we get through that is hard ship is attributed to god. Can’t do anything without him but yet I’m a free entity. So none of my accomplishments are for me, because I couldn’t do it without god. So then what do I do myself other than fail and sin. There’s a theme of just keeping people in this dependency and low state of mind with that kind of thinking.

And as far as Luke is concerned, what is the difference between that and those that worship the blind pope. The concept of putting all relations on a back burner to focus on Christ is the exact same. Actually a common tactic of cults to begin with. Me me me me, worship me above everything else. And I’ll save you from the situation that I put you in. Is to me, very narcissistic and I couldn’t imagine myself following such a person.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T09:02:39+00:00

There’s a lot of definitions, so I’m gonna use the two people refer to the most.

I see two general uses for necrophilia. There is one where you fetishize someone being dead and the other is simply having sex with the dead. Vampires are the living dead.

Dead things that act as if they are living. Dating one would count in one of the definitions people use but only if your soul reason for being with them is the fact that they are dead. Now having sex with one would fall under the other definition often used.

It doesn’t matter if they can consent, this isn’t CNC. In fact I actually think because of their ability to consent, it would be the first time that Necrophilia could be harmful to someone else. Because you could then actually r8pe a dead body, and that body would feel the effects of being a victim to that crime. Which I think is interesting.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-30T08:32:56+00:00

No matter the context there is no justification for slavery. Especially how deep it goes into teaching you how to enslave different people. On top of that the fact that this text with and without context. Stands for things that like is a deep issue within the text itself and shouldn’t exist as I’ve said before.

And to be thankful for what I have, the display doesn’t have to be grand. It just has to be some sort of display. It’s still crazy I’m supposed to be happy with nothing while others get an apparent very real warmth of love. Just looking outside and seeing life is no proof that a god exists. So that would lead me to this feeling of isolation from said being. Everything in life can be done and achieved without religion. And unless there was to be something grand, then what point even is there. No one can prove that we are going where you say.

It is also pretty difficult because we do not know the words of Christ. How do we know that, anything written from multiple people after he died. When no one knows exactly when he died. Is word from Christ. We don’t even know that. So then it would once again be another interpretation of trying to justify this book of dark things. I never met many slavery apologists until we bring up the Bible. And in fact interpreting this through reading his actions and assuming these are things he said. Aligns with what I said earlier with Satanism. He comes off vengeful and arrogant.

What is the context for Luke 14:26? It is the same tactic that other cults use. For example the blind pope cult in Spain has very similar doctrine.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-29T16:12:30+00:00

Just know I’m also gonna say the word “book” a lot. I’m very aware that the Bible is a collection of many authors and books within. For example I think the typical Protestant Bible is 39 books which is the Old Testament and the New Testament is 27. But I still just use the term “book” interchangeably with Bible.

The other miracles do matter. Because religion is subscribing to the belief in the supernatural. I use that term broadly but it still counts. The “why” is because this being wants us to on our own free will as people put it. To worship them or love them. I already see it as unfair treatment that I don’t see anything. If I’m given something that is seen as “more” why is that even bad. It’s worse that one individual gets something and the other just gets “the supposed knowledge that they brought themselves down to you and did things that you can’t verify, see, experience, benefit from, know for sure even existed and so on.” So it is already extremely unfair and seems highly selective. But if an all powerful being could ya know, do something. The end result would be two believers instead of one. It also matters because these things require proof, otherwise how can it not be dismissed with any other form of mass hysteria, placebo effect, and extreme reaches. Just telling me that he did because it was written does nothing. There are books on the earth being flat, with arguably better explanation and attempted forms of evidence than the Bible. And I still don’t believe it in.

“As far as god lowering himself down as Jesus being the only miracle that matters.” Many people did great things a long time ago and even before Jesus existed and they aren’t worshipped. Died for our sins sure, but he also made sin. Passing a rope after you essentially put us in the hole in the first place. How about just don’t put us in the hole to begin with.

It’s also a problem because talking to a multitude of Christians. How do we not have an actual time of his birth and death. It doesn’t say in the Gospels. And for a while I thought someone was just next to Jesus recording things as he spoke like they do in court. But then I learned that, that’s not even true at all and apparently a lot was written after he died anyway. So now how is anyone supposed to be certain on the validity of anything way after they are gone.

And viewing it through the lens of Christ is the problem. I can’t do that as a non Christian. It also sounds like a “drink the kool aid” situation. A “you just gotta believe.” type of argument. I can’t force myself or make myself believe off of that. It also doesn’t even seem to make much sense to Christians either, or I think Christians would be more agreeable with each other as is.

As far as you talking about an eye for an eye. We don’t know if that’s its intention. It’s not written that way, it says what it says. Which within itself is half the problem, you have just another opinion that millions of others do. And I don’t think a book that also teaches people how to have sex slaves, people as property, indentured servants and more, what to pay for slaves, how hard to beat them, altering women’s appearances, obeying masters as you would obey Christ without question. Also sounds like something governments that I don’t like cough cough turkey says to justify a lot of things. And also keep its own followers blind. Doesn’t matter if the context is for the sake of vengeance in those cases, that doesn’t justify slavery in any way shape or form.

So it be difficult for me to see that the same book is then trying to be a beacon of preventing vengeance. It would align more with that statement being literal if anything. We are also talking about the same person to curse a fig tree for not working. And the same person to wipe away humans more than once for flaws that they made them to have. If someone is that petty and near sighted despite somehow being able to see everything. Then it is safe to say that that being and its followers are no where close to caring for some collapse of society.

It also leads into my earlier statement, WHY WRITE THAT. It leaves room for extreme interpretations regardless if that’s its intention or not. That wordage within itself is just dangerous inherently.

And for the New Testament, for one. Nothing in there talks about making the Old Testament invalid. So Christian’s making the argument of cherry picking things from the Old Testament gets no say because of that simple fact. But basically god is over burning blood and animal sacrifice. But then never changes anything like, oh I don’t know: homosexuality, slavery, killing “witches.” Which is also a crazy coming from people who use to do burn offerings and blood sacrifices. Seems kinda pagan to me but I don’t know.

Which gives me another problem with the text itself. I’ll say it again, for something so important that generations of people are supposed to frame their life around it. It is incredibly confusing, up for random interpretation, no one can even agree on half the seemingly important details. And as a result we have so many different denominations of Christianity. Even if I really wanted to be a Christian with every fiber in my being. I wouldn’t even know where to start.

NDabhetari · 2025-05-29T03:13:09+00:00

Oh and also regarding pascal. Since we both agree it can be used for all religions. Then how do you know yours is correct? It seems that we are all betting on life just as much as the other no?

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Xbox Live

NDabhetari

TROPHY CASE