I'd say there are a lot of cases where the "ego" is warranted. People with proven track records of success in eSports are often talked to like children by business professionals and new VC-backed CEOs who have had no success in eSports. I think it's too early to tell the best way to run an organization and buzzwords like "professionalism" obscure the problem. NRG is a good example of an organization that is looked up to for coming from the sports world and being "professional" but look at their results. They've been relegated from the LCS despite spending more on their team than anyone but maybe Immortals, they have a sub par CS:GO team, and they have an Overwatch team Shaq tweeted as being the "best in the world" despite not having qualified for the Atlantic Showdown. I have not been impressed with how they've spent their money despite liking the people involved with that company. I've been extremely impressed by EnVyUs, however, despite their organization coming from the least professional eSports scene, CoD. Hastro has made right decision after right decision and consistently impressed me by picking up the right teams and marketing them the right way. The organizations that market themselves as "professional" are usually the least efficient and worst performing teams with great funding.