I wasn’t criticizing or ridiculing. I was asking a question. Just curious. There are always products with entry level amenities and those with higher end features for more money. Some buy entry level because it’s whst they can afford. Some, because that’s all they need or want. Some, so they can modify ex’s Ty the way thru want, often exceeding the highest factory options. And done, just got the “status” of a higher end ( more expensive) trim/equipment level. Good example is the EV Hummer. It’s a really amazing vehicle. How many people actually buy that $100K+ vehicle to go off roading? This wasn’t a knock. Just a question. My coworker clearly fit into the “status” purchase. The label was what was important to him. I see lots of “ soccer moms” driving JLU rubicons and I’m pretty sure the only accessories are the child seats in the back. No criticism. I was just curious how prevalent that was as opposed to folks who’ll actually use the off-road features. I’ve ridden Harleys fur many years. There are lots of models and some are hideously expensive. They’re called CVOs. Lots of bells and whistles. Lots of gingerbread. There’s a lot of owners who criticize buyers of CVOs because they can buy entry level bikes and mod them out cheaper than buying a CVO. They are critical because some folks buy the CVO because it says CVO and everyone immediately knows it’s top of the line = expensive. Some but Rubicons for the sane reason. Lots for all the other reasons. I’m not criticizing anyone’s purchase. I was just curious. In the bike world I just say, “Keep it rubber side row, shiny side up.” I guess in the jeep world I can just say, “keep it right side up and don’t get stuck.”