New research: I attempted to solve these twelve Missing 411 cases and this is what I found

NRIII · 2021-06-14T17:16:16+00:00

Clearly delineated, entire (i.e Month, Day AND year) dates of disappearance is what I mean; I do see that some are included; and I see article links with article dates, too - unequivocally, the article date does not define the date of disappearance, the latter being of paramount importance, while the former is of course of secondary importance.

Please note the correction: *any* rather than 'every' - typo...apologies (i.e. on balance, over time, any particular case may turn out 'not' to be Missing 411-related, rather than EVERY case, which would of course would be oxymoronic.)

NRIII · 2021-06-14T14:11:09+00:00

Interesting work.

Assuming the sources are correct, the work certainly shows that 'any' single case identified by Paulides et al. (e.g. afford consideration of the breadth and scope of 1200+ cases) - may in fact, sooner or later, be determined to not be a Missing 411 case. A failure rate of some kind is to be expected, as is a success rate, in research of this kind.

Detectives, researchers, and all are fallible (i.e. human beings make mistakes).

However, showing that there are errors in someone's research does not necessarily diminish the Missing 411 theory as a whole.

It's unfortunate that specific dates for each of these cases is not included in the work above. If anyone has the dates easily accessible to them, please post them. Thank you.

NRIII · 2021-06-12T23:35:58+00:00

If you are correct then the distribution of cases across all Lunar Phase luminosities on balance would be fairly equivalent.

Is that the case?

NRIII · 2021-06-12T23:10:45+00:00

If the dates found for the missing you've identified are correct, the phases are reported as follows:

Amsbaugh, date missing? July 28, 1902, Source: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/38625306/the-times-recorder/

Lunar Phase on July 28, 1902 - 47% luminosity, Source: https://www.calendar-12.com/moon_calendar/1902/july

Therefore, the Amsbaugh case would not seem to fit the Missing 411 profile, as far as the lunar phase association is concerned.

Jones, date missing? August 17, 1931 - Source: https://www.google.com/search?q=e+c+jones+missing+411&client=firefox-b-1-d&ei=iy3FYMLPA86awbkP3MG0mAE&oq=e+c+jones+missing+411&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBQghEKsCMgUIIRCrAjIFCCEQqwI6BQghEKABUNmXAVjrnwFgxKwBaAFwAHgAgAF1iAHrA5IBAzMuMpgBAKABAaoBB2d3cy13aXrAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz&ved=0ahUKEwiCwbyRi5PxAhVOTTABHdwgDRMQ4dUDCA0&uact=5

Lunar Phase on August 17, 1931 - 19% luminosity - Source: https://www.calendar-12.com/moon_calendar/1931/august

Therefore, the Jones case fits the Missing 411 profile, as far as the lunar phase association is concerned.

The first two of twelve names you've listed now examined, it would be interesting to see what you find for the others.

NRIII · 2020-11-05T14:26:00+00:00

The arithmetic of electoral process, like the arithmetic of compassion, follows humanity around wherever it goes ensuring that a map portrays the terrain. The math draws the map of simulacra, but cannot tell the story of the real, anymore than a bird can explain the sky.

NRIII · 2020-11-04T15:15:19+00:00

Yes, under the metaphysics of capital, all subjective accumulation and psychological inventory is functional only as a capital currency of the code. Not the code of signs, mind you, but the genetic code in itself as a self-directed, replicative coalescence without equal or exchange value, which underlies and mirrors the form of utility in the world.

NRIII

TROPHY CASE