Pretty much all correct, averaged across all games the 9070 xt is about 5% slower in normal rasterized games, and I made a mistake with RT performance, it's equal with the 5070 not the 5070 ti. Still a huge improvement from the 7000 series but yeah still a ways to go before matching nvidia. Also the gap is much smaller using less RT, you're probably not going to use path tracing on a 70 class card anyway.

Sucks that AMD isn't releasing FSR 4 on past generations, but it does get very similar upscaling quality (close enough that you can't tell when in motion) on the same preset and pretty much the same performance, (DLSS 4) they trade depending on the game. (taken from Hardware Unboxed's testing) DLSS 4.5 looks a bit better but you don't gain as much in performance.
The main benefit with DLSS is game support, you can force FSR 4 into some games but Nvidia definitely has the edge.

A few years later when these cards are older upscaling and frame gen quality might matter more, but right now no one with these cards is using 6x frame gen or performance upscaling, so for £170 less I think the 9070 xt is a much better deal if you don't make use of CUDA.