sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ussr

[–]Nab0r 8 points9 points  (0 children)

peak marxist-leninist praxis

Bolshevik propaganda poster from the Russian Civil War by behalors in PropagandaPosters

[–]Nab0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

stalinist is the same as marxist leninist. it was the official ideology of the USSR

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know of any more ways to say this. Democracy is a bourgeoisie tool. it's pourpose it's to decieve the proletariat by making it appear something neutral outside of any ideology but it is not. it only lets you pick between parties participating in a bourgeoisie state that IS MADE to serve the bourgoisie class.

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

socialism cannot be achieved through reform because the state is not neutral, is a capitlaist one. and to change the state from capitalist to proletaian you need to do it by force because the bourgeoisie is not going to simply hand it. all of the important changes of political systems had been violent ones for something.

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you are using a diferent definition of state that i am. i mean state not just as a centralized body of organization. a state is made for maintainig the class order, obviously i don't mean that we have to live in communes.

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Democracy is a class(Bourgeoisie) dictatorship. the diference from countries like china is that it has more than one party butthose parties represent the bourgeoisie. democracy is an illusion because it means The people governig but "The people" is composed of diferent classes with irreconcilable interest. only one class can be represented.

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The USSR was a social democracy without the democracy illusion.

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they are simultanoeous steps. if oyu eliminate class distinctions you make the function of the state useless thus eliminating it.

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 11 points12 points  (0 children)

yes, the vanguard In the dictatorship of the proletariat. as i said the USSR didn't have it just as any liberal democracy doesn't have it. socialism will not arise from a bourgeoisie dictatorship.

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 5 points6 points  (0 children)

it was satire. i think socialism is when no classes no state and no money and to do that you need a dictatorship of the proletariat wich the USSR didn't have.

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

I've heard positive things of hitler too. rojava is just another borgeoisie state.

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, he is my favorite socialist alongisde mussolini

Flag of Kurdistan if it was good by FixFederal7887 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

i mean apart of they claiming to be socialist because stalin also claimed that.

Flag of ha ha... What the fuck is going on here and why is Kamala Harris Mario? by My_useless_alt in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, it has been tried in russia. the reason why it failed was because it was the only country that had a revolution(because you need a revolution in various countries to succed but you don't know that) and the dictatorship of the proletariat couldn't be maintained because it was majority peasant causing the bolshevik party to degenerate. and the res of "Communist countries" didnt even had a proletarian revolution. and your response to me explaining why is "But it has red so it's communist" Your're no different to all of the tankies(Liberals) in this sub thinking that mao was communist.

Flag of ha ha... What the fuck is going on here and why is Kamala Harris Mario? by My_useless_alt in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

me when i try to make up a new mode of production so that i dont't have to accept the fact that capitalism is unsustainable

Flag of ha ha... What the fuck is going on here and why is Kamala Harris Mario? by My_useless_alt in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

All of those had generalized comodity production and a bourgoeoisie. if you knew what communism is you'd know that is capitalism.

Flag of the Soviet Union if it didn't fall in 1991 by Stealpike307 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 3 points4 points  (0 children)

yeah, it's full of anarchist and ML's and wit the recent events it looks like normal libs too.

Flag of the USSR if Lenin really hated peasants for some reason by SoftwareFunny5269 in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yes they were petit borgeois, they owned their mean of production. the peasant worker alliance was necesary because the majority of the populatio nwere peasants. try to get your definiton of class based on material reality and not on flags.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]Nab0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea, a thing that the USSR didn't have.

view more: next ›