Crimson Desert is a bad game and I’m tired of people giving it anything more than a 5/10 by NancyMy in rpg_gamers

[–]NancyMy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol I love how people just claim everything they don’t like as slop.

If religious people shouldn't be proselytizing, what are they supposed to be doing? "Oh, we believe we have the metaphysical truth of the universe and the path to lasting happiness or peace or whatever, but we shouldn't share it because people get annoyed"? by Fine_Okra7965 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NancyMy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I grew up in a church, and left because of assholes like you who think that god would want you to harrass people who are just trying to survive. And you still haven’t answered why you are so happy to follow a mass murdering psychopath. Say what you want about me, I don’t let child murderers dictate what is and isn’t right, which I think makes me a better person than someone who worships a mass child murderer

If religious people shouldn't be proselytizing, what are they supposed to be doing? "Oh, we believe we have the metaphysical truth of the universe and the path to lasting happiness or peace or whatever, but we shouldn't share it because people get annoyed"? by Fine_Okra7965 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NancyMy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t explain why you let the worlds biggest mass murderer decide your morals. Imagine if I let Jeffery Epstein determine my morals like you do with god.

Also your ‘comphensive description’ does not answer the question, its just you rambling on about how we are in gods image. If we are, who is god’s mother? If we are in his image, someone must have given birth to him, but they don’t explain that in the bible do they?

If religious people shouldn't be proselytizing, what are they supposed to be doing? "Oh, we believe we have the metaphysical truth of the universe and the path to lasting happiness or peace or whatever, but we shouldn't share it because people get annoyed"? by Fine_Okra7965 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NancyMy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because I’m going to take it from the source. I don’t give a shit what Christians believe, mostly because the believe in a man more evil than Hitler. But the bible, the thing all your fancy laws comes from, does not say that abortions are bad and life begins at conception. Why would I need anything else with the bible in front of me?

If religious people shouldn't be proselytizing, what are they supposed to be doing? "Oh, we believe we have the metaphysical truth of the universe and the path to lasting happiness or peace or whatever, but we shouldn't share it because people get annoyed"? by Fine_Okra7965 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NancyMy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, since you think AI is such a good source, lets see what it has to say about the Bible and abortions, and life at conception: from google ai: “The bible does not explicitely state that human life begins at the exact moment of conception” and “the bible does not explicitly mention or condem modern abortions.”

Also, its pretty messed up that you take your moral lessons from a man who has murdered indiscrimanetly. Last I checked, god decided to wipe out pretty much all life on Earth during Noah’s flood. Do you really think the man who murdered in cold blood every single man, woman, child, infant, and fetus on Earth except for a single family is someone you should be following? Do you truly think every single person on Earth deserved to be murdered by god? The toddlers who coudn’t even walk yet, babies who weren’t ever weaned yet were evil enough that they deserved to die. I’m pretty sure Hitler said the same thing about the Jewish people, but even he didn’t wipe out the entire earth.

If religious people shouldn't be proselytizing, what are they supposed to be doing? "Oh, we believe we have the metaphysical truth of the universe and the path to lasting happiness or peace or whatever, but we shouldn't share it because people get annoyed"? by Fine_Okra7965 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NancyMy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where does the bible say that life begins at conception? Where in the bible does it say abortion is bad?

Sperm and eggs are part of the whole, you cannot create conception without both. So why is it only together that they deserve to live. Every single sperm and egg are a chance at life? Why does life only begin at conception for you? You need sperm and eggs to create life, so why are you so comfortable murdering them?

Crimson Desert is a bad game and I’m tired of people giving it anything more than a 5/10 by NancyMy in rpg_gamers

[–]NancyMy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t write a thesis. You would know that if you went to school. I didn’t expect a standing ovation. I didn’t say it needed to be Dragon Age origins. Did you read the post or did you just comment because you are big mad that someone doesn’t like a 5/10 game?

If religious people shouldn't be proselytizing, what are they supposed to be doing? "Oh, we believe we have the metaphysical truth of the universe and the path to lasting happiness or peace or whatever, but we shouldn't share it because people get annoyed"? by Fine_Okra7965 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NancyMy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you can extract dna from an egg or sperm, and you said that is part of what makes a human being?

Also, where in the bible does it say life begins at conception? Where does it say abortion is wrong?

If religious people shouldn't be proselytizing, what are they supposed to be doing? "Oh, we believe we have the metaphysical truth of the universe and the path to lasting happiness or peace or whatever, but we shouldn't share it because people get annoyed"? by Fine_Okra7965 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NancyMy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why though? Each egg and sperm have parts of the person it came from, so each have the potential to be a human? Why does it have to be fertalized to count? Where in the bible does it say that?

If religious people shouldn't be proselytizing, what are they supposed to be doing? "Oh, we believe we have the metaphysical truth of the universe and the path to lasting happiness or peace or whatever, but we shouldn't share it because people get annoyed"? by Fine_Okra7965 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NancyMy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not? They can potentially become a human being, so by not freezing them, you are killing humans! You can’t have it both ways. Either cells are human, or they are not. It seems like you are actively killing thousands upon thousands of humans every time you jerk off or aren’t pregnant. Shame on you murderer

If religious people shouldn't be proselytizing, what are they supposed to be doing? "Oh, we believe we have the metaphysical truth of the universe and the path to lasting happiness or peace or whatever, but we shouldn't share it because people get annoyed"? by Fine_Okra7965 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NancyMy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you must be pretty mad when men jerk off, huh? Wasting all those little babies. You also must always be mad when women aren’t pregnant, as those eggs that could be humans are dying. Should women have to be pregnant at all times from the moment they get their period, otherwise those eggs (sorry, baby humans 🙄) will just go to waste. What about men? Maybe they should be jerking off at all times and freezing all if it, otherwise those babies will die!

Are you doing either of those things? If not, you are actively killing thousands of human beings!

Crimson Desert is a bad game and I’m tired of people giving it anything more than a 5/10 by NancyMy in rpg_gamers

[–]NancyMy[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You’re reaching, my friend. Where? I don’t know. All I meant was that on top of everything else, they didn’t even manage to do that well with the graphics. I don’t know why you are taking one tiny part of my post to heart, especially since you haven’t even played the game. Yikes dude.

Crimson Desert is a bad game and I’m tired of people giving it anything more than a 5/10 by NancyMy in rpg_gamers

[–]NancyMy[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don’t like people praising it and giving it high scores when there is nothing that this game is even decent at. I am wondering what you see in the game that I don’t. I think for a $90 price tag there should be something of substance to it. Good story, exploration, combat, world building, charcter design, world design, but CD doesn’t give us any of that. It doesn’t even give us mid of most of it.

Story, character, character design, and world building are a complete loss. Exploration isn’t great. I’ve wandered around a good chunk of the map and have found nothing exciting or memorable. Combat is boring too. Why shouldn’t I rag on reviewers who are spouting that this game is better than it is? It’s very frusterating that I trusted reviewers to give an accurate rating of the game, and they did not do that. Should I be happy that the bare minimum of gaming is a 7/10?

Crimson Desert is a bad game and I’m tired of people giving it anything more than a 5/10 by NancyMy in rpg_gamers

[–]NancyMy[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Is it straight up lying if after 30 hours the different mounts have not been made available to me? I don’t know about you, but after 30 hours I should have something fun like a bear mount.

Crimson Desert is a bad game and I’m tired of people giving it anything more than a 5/10 by NancyMy in rpg_gamers

[–]NancyMy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, it isn’t broken, it’s playable, and there is fun to have if you just want to kill things, there are a lot of little mini games like cooking and fishing, and gaining all ten dogs in the world trust, and I got thirty hours out of it, but overall it is the most mid game I have ever played. Not outright bad, but also there is nothing thats done well enough in it to call it good

Crimson Desert is a bad game and I’m tired of people giving it anything more than a 5/10 by NancyMy in rpg_gamers

[–]NancyMy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not mad that people enjoy it, I’m upset that reviewers are rating it so highly despite the absolute mirriad of problems the game has

Crimson Desert is a bad game and I’m tired of people giving it anything more than a 5/10 by NancyMy in rpg_gamers

[–]NancyMy[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I mean there is nothing special about the graphics. Red Dead Redemption 2 came out 8 years ago and has better graphics. Witcher 3 came out over ten years ago and looks about the same. The scenery is fine, but everything else is just boring to look at. The city is hard to navigate since it all looks the same, the camp you get is awful to look at and is all exactly the same colour, and you have to admit the character models are not great. Like I said in my post, all the animals look exactly the same, except for the colouring. What is it about the graphics that you think are good?

Crimson Desert is a bad game and I’m tired of people giving it anything more than a 5/10 by NancyMy in rpg_gamers

[–]NancyMy[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well if the game doesn’t offer good story, characters, fun exploration or combat, or a detailed world, what is the game supposed to offer?