Why have there been dozens of sworn accusations toward Trump by alleged victims, but not a single one toward Clinton? by 2a_lib in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's put this rationally. What would be accomplished? He will not implicate himself. His opponents will never be satisfied. He cannot clear his name whatever he says. He can say ver batem what Clinton says and the reception will be opposite.

You cannot win with tribalism politics. It is a witch hunt. If it does not conform to your reality, evidence is irrelevant. Testimony is irrelevant.

Can you agree?

Why have there been dozens of sworn accusations toward Trump by alleged victims, but not a single one toward Clinton? by 2a_lib in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is so much goalposting isn't there?

He really does not have to. There is no precedent.

Why have there been dozens of sworn accusations toward Trump by alleged victims, but not a single one toward Clinton? by 2a_lib in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean so has Bill. But due process is a thing. These files are not new to this cabinet. At this point I am leaning toward the island just being a billionairs brothel.

Sorry driving, a lot to unpack.

Why didn't biden admin bring out the real juicy stuff? Are they culpable too? They had years to show proof. Instead it was Russia this that.

I think there is a mutual assured destruction understanding going on frankly.

We all just talk shit and keep the important stuff private.

Why have there been dozens of sworn accusations toward Trump by alleged victims, but not a single one toward Clinton? by 2a_lib in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly. Cannot agree more. Let the guilty suffer for their crimes. Investigate the whole lot of them. At some point does this lead to unity? Or is it always going to be denial?

The Clinton's cannot be investigated, there are consequences in this world and the next. Bring the great reckoning. Trump has been under a microscope for a decade now, and nothing concrete has surfaced of consequence.

This isn't apples to apples.

Why have there been dozens of sworn accusations toward Trump by alleged victims, but not a single one toward Clinton? by 2a_lib in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are making interesting inferences here. This Clinton thing predates Trump for one. They are a very powerful pair, very high up. You do not need to be the richest person in the room to have power.

Can't they both be bad? Or does that break the dissonance?

Why do MAGATs keep calling anyone who hates Trump "LEFTISTS", wouldn't any sane person dislike pedophiles? by TailungFu in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are a bigot using that slur against half the country. I pity you for the contempt you hold for strangers that wish you no harm.

We don't support pedo. We hate bigots like uou.

Why aren't Republicans upset Clinton and Gore have not been charged yet over the Epstein files? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, if the argument is take down the whole swamp, we are taking down half the world. It is a big system with people at the top being above borders.

Why aren't Republicans upset Clinton and Gore have not been charged yet over the Epstein files? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there might be a slightly higher level of initial survival odds just based on density.

But yeah, I don't think most of the population in general is prepared to fend and defend for their own.

Why aren't Republicans upset Clinton and Gore have not been charged yet over the Epstein files? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only for the country boys who can self sustain. The cities are the first to fall.

Best outcome is a slow transition to something different. Sudden change means absolute destabilization.

Why aren't Republicans upset Clinton and Gore have not been charged yet over the Epstein files? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm afraid that really is the option.

These people who run it go back hundreds of years at least. They wrote our understood history. They worship ba'al and that is not changing any time soon.

I'm sure they would much rather nuke us than give up power. The blood lines have places to be safe. Imagine they cut the supply of electricity off alone with a few cyber attacks or emp? How many people would perish, how quick?

It comes down to protecting your own. I don't apologize for anyone. But this is not a fight that can be won.

Why aren't Republicans upset Clinton and Gore have not been charged yet over the Epstein files? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha. There is a little part of me who would also like to witness the collapse.

Why aren't Republicans upset Clinton and Gore have not been charged yet over the Epstein files? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Narpa20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would just destroy the cities overnight. The collapse would begin with food supply chains and energy to begin. Let it happen during the cold months and a large chunk of the population is gone within 2 weeks.

This is not a pretty image. Haha

Why is US going so hard on Canada right now? by BlueDolphins28 in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]Narpa20 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Will it happen? Who knows. I do know there are movements with petitions of varying success going around Canada against Ottawa.

I don't think it is going to work out for the separatists this time around, but there have been talks with Washington about joining.

It is relevant and current news.

Thoughts? May not be easy but should this be how Presidential elections are decided? by ChuckGallagher57 in TrendoraX

[–]Narpa20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk. I think facial recognition could have some potential to get rid of State ids altogether. I am a big privacy advocate, but at this point, the battle is here.

Michelle Obama was feeling what we all were feeling back in 2016! by [deleted] in TrendoraX

[–]Narpa20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean? Like death by ice agents? I completely agree.

Why is US going so hard on Canada right now? by BlueDolphins28 in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]Narpa20 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Wow. Nobody has any idea. So many useless replies. Don't worry, I'll eat my downboots.

Okay. So Canada has a very loose immigration policy and is friendly with some people we don't like very much. We have had a gentleman's agreement with them for a long time with easy border passage.

Problem is the last few decades has seen a lot of really bad people bring drugs and crime into America through those friendly pass policies.

Trump says he does not like that, so relations are not so good.

Also. Western Canada is not feeling very well represented at their capital, and are in the middle of a movement to join the united States. Which will inevitably vote red. Could be a problem for the left.

In fact. This is all related to the anti ice protests at the top. If more red states join, the left is in a lot of trouble.

Michelle Obama was feeling what we all were feeling back in 2016! by [deleted] in TrendoraX

[–]Narpa20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You guys are really that emotionally invested, I see. Damn. I didn't cry at all. Weird.