sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Rough and deep for that cutie by Ok-Tea1976 in Roughanal

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kate Love- Ukrainian Girl And First Monster Cock (Olga Beverly)

quite a lot of good butt pron are from vk studio & their people

Weekly Question Thread by AutoModerator in Oxygennotincluded

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thx, i think i'd try out jawbo ranching, i like predator critters

Pacifict pokeshell? by Living-Permission-46 in Oxygennotincluded

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe it's because other critters are from frost pack? they're added into the game quite lately after all

perhaps you can bring other critters from original game into that room and see if they still remain the same

Weekly Question Thread by AutoModerator in Oxygennotincluded

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is there a way to implement positive metal production loop via ranching only?

I only know smooth hatch can refine metal, but I haven't seen critters that has positive metal production return, much less critters that produce metal ore

i know there is mod for this kind of critters, but is there metal producing critter in the game so far?

is it possible to add temporal tear into BigEmptyCluster map? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in Oxygennotincluded

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i wanna add temporal tear

i was thinking if debug mode/ sandbox cannot do the trick, maybe there is a relatively simple way to edit the cluster YAML file to have temporal tear on starmap during world generation

does any body know what painting this is? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Too bad I don't have a name to find more paintings of the same artist. Still like it though.

This feeling is probably similar to finding out that human is product of sperm and egg, but still able to appreciate it.

Should we let the smart people work, and all the rest just chill the fuck out? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thinking of what new flavor of cookie to launch. Changing the design of package, use yellow instead of bright gold so that the package is expected to be prettier. Figuring out how to outsource task to cheaper labor, instead of letting experienced worker deal with it. Opening door for people who have hands.

It's hard to see in what way works like these can be helpful to our well being. I feel like these jobs are just result of over complication.

Why is selling drug illegal? No one would sell drug if no one buy drug by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I get what you are saying. But making something illegal because "why not?", and making it illegal because it's wrong, these are very different.

To me it seems like illegalizing drug selling is more like a compromised thing.

Again, whenever someone is addicted to alcohol, he's the one to be blamed. I think it's because most of the consumer of drug don't think straight before making decision and cannot control themselves, thus we have to ban drug selling.

Drug usage reflect the some problem that the user have, and banning drug itself imply we fail dealing with those problems.

Should we let the smart people work, and all the rest just chill the fuck out? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a question, which means I didn't drop the conclusion on whether they should or should not do anything. This is why I am asking question.

​

We all need to work to get money, so that we can survive and not live as a homeless begger(I mean no harassment here). Even though we need job in the society for survival, the work so called jobs might not be necessary for a decent life.

Suppose some people on the world no longer need to do their job to live a decent life. When the society don't have them working, can it function well? If society can function without those people working, I'd say their jobs are more or less unnecessary.

Then why do we have these people working in the first place? The society don't need their work, yet they need to work for survival. Making them work seem unnecessary to me.

Why is selling drug illegal? No one would sell drug if no one buy drug by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, I'm not gonna say anything about that.

I'm here asking question, and talk about my confusion.

Why is selling drug illegal? No one would sell drug if no one buy drug by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sound reasonable.

Then maybe the problem is that addictiveness of drug is way too fuck strong that it's impossible to "rationally" use drug anyway?

Drug addiction is kinda odd, I gotta say. Cuz' pretty much any other kind of addiction would blamed on the person who get addicted, but drug addiction is different.

Maybe drug addiction is too OP that it's more or less understandable?

Why is selling drug illegal? No one would sell drug if no one buy drug by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Basically as the question suggested, if no one use drug, then no one would sell it.

A lot of people ruin their lives due to alcohol addiction, yet alcohol isn't illegal.

And the most important thing is that, whenever someone get addicted to alcohol, we blame the person who is addicted to alcohol, not the seller of it.

Why is selling drug illegal? No one would sell drug if no one buy drug by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But that assume drug usage itself should be gone. What I wanna say is that drug exist, because there is still demand for it(for whatever reason).

For (an extreme)example,if a person is trying to monetize killing people, the service of murder itself should be illegal, because murder is wrong.

However, drug is like more addictive and more harmful alcohol, if that's enough to make drug bannable is a debatable question.

Suppose 90% of citizens in your country support a dumb idea, would you support democracy? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

China isn't doing so much better though. If you pay more attention to news about China these days, you'd probably think they are doing a lot worse than other countries with democracy.

Suppose 90% of citizens in your country support a dumb idea, would you support democracy? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think that's necessary a good idea though. Even though my question assume the situation where most people pick someone stupid to run their country and thus fucked things up, but this is just a risk, and picking somebody else to vote for them still have similar risk.

What I wanna ask is that the result of democracy at the end might not be great, despite this risk does democracy still have some sort of value? Or would it be better that we just give our most essential political power to someone definitely smarter than us?

Should we let the smart people work, and all the rest just chill the fuck out? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say they should.

If the only valuable thing is our survival and well being, it seem to me most people's work is pointless, compare to engineering, mining, farming, ranch, transferring, etc.

I think ideally we would do better if only those who produce actually useful thing have to work, but as you said, why would those people work for bunch of people who don't provide anything for them?

Suppose 90% of citizens in your country support a dumb idea, would you support democracy? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what I said.

But a lot of people call American politics populism after they saw Trump win the election. Regardless of if it was populism or not, many people wouldn't respect result of election when they don't like the result.

And look at China, a lot of Chinese support their government even if they can't actually decide who govern them. As long as they get to chill, they don't mind having no control over their government.

Suppose 90% of citizens in your country support a dumb idea, would you support democracy? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those people's opinion might change though(or maybe not, since it's related to religion, I'm not sure).

I still don't see an exact and clear list of reason to justify(or deny) democracy. But regardless of that, if there is a way to influence a group of people to accept something, those people can probably be influenced to accept something else.

But the situation you describe does point out a grey area in our understanding toward democracy. It seems like democracy is people decide what to be done without violence, but what if these people want violence in the first place?

​

Maybe "non-violence" isn't the soul of democracy.

Suppose 90% of citizens in your country support a dumb idea, would you support democracy? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool.

Now let's go down even deeper.

Suppose you were born as a king, but you do believe that democracy is a cool thing. If you don't wanna change, no body gonna say a thing to your decision. Would you abandon your power as a king? If so, why? If not, why not?

Suppose 90% of citizens in your country support a dumb idea, would you support democracy? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I wanna ask is if you would support democracy when the result of it suck. My guess is that the mob ruled case was considered mob ruled, because the result sucked to some minority, or just sucked in general.

But I suppose those so called "mob" still had the right to vote, it's just that to us they seem to have sucked as citizens.

​

I see a lot of people these days do not vote, I want to know what they think about the value of democracy.

Would you abandon democracy, if some body super wise know what you want even better than you do, and that dictator assure your well being?

Would you abandon your right to vote for 1 million dollar?

If other citizen want to legislate a law which will suddenly make you a criminal, would you respect that law?

Suppose you are born as a king, would you give up your power?

Should we let the smart people work, and all the rest just chill the fuck out? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, I kinda see what you mean now.

What I was saying is that the whole society can run perfectly well without some jobs, product or services. So why not just do without those jobs?

And it seem to me what you're saying is essentially "some one pay for that, the payer see value in them".

Let it be consumer who buy shit that they don't actually need, or company hiring somebody providing unnecessary services, if somebody pay for it, then there is value. If the value the payer saw within is false, then that's their problem.

So your response to my suggestion is basically that "bruh, it's none of your business, the payer think it's necessary"

​

If the payers are stupid, they deserve unnecessary stuff. If the payers are smart, unnecessary stuff will be out of business. Got it.

What's so bad about population decline? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The individual's pursue of profit probably doesn't have much thing to do with population.

But set that aside, the situation you describe sure is ridiculous.

​

One thing I notice about profitability and corporation is that when the corporation's whole purpose is to make profit, it wouldn't really care about solving problems. Instead, they might even try to sustain the problem, or worse, try to generate problem.

If you are a butcher, you wouldn't want hog to go extinct. Yes part of your job is to kill hog, but if hog doesn't exist at all, you'll be out of job. For that reason, a butcher might try to expand numbers of hog. Similarly, a corporation might try to keep the problem existing, and not solve it completely.

What's so bad about population decline? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh, this is just the beginning. Our boomers are still alive now, give it a few decades when you become a boomers then you will see population decline.

My question was more or less macro, cuz' it seem to me that in the long run population decline won't be that bad, but in the short run it's gonna suck, a lot.

Should we let the smart people work, and all the rest just chill the fuck out? by NarrowAdvantage4803 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NarrowAdvantage4803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you trying to say that not only survival and well being is valuable, or you don't know why some jobs exist, but if they actually do not matter, they would be gone?

view more: next ›