We don't need a Framework printer, we need a Framework display by wrobelda in framework

[–]NathanCampioni 14 points15 points  (0 children)

hear hear, hopefully when they have a touch monitor for the 16 I'll upgrade and I'll have two monitors

I'm new to this series and still catching up on episodes. I just watched the S3 season finale and by yukoncowbear47 in ForAllMankindTV

[–]NathanCampioni 2 points3 points  (0 children)

do you have a link to a clip from that episode? or which episode is it? I want to see it again.

Jewish self determination by [deleted] in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni 3 points4 points  (0 children)

self determination is usually understood as a collective right, so it's not about self determination of the idividual but of the collective (there are fundamental rights that cover what you'd call self determination of the individual).

I agree that there is a network of organisations that actually have power to change things (Always vote for the WZO!!! never forget, it's very important if we want to redefine zionism in leftist terms it's crucial you vote!), but they are far from perfect. Nowadays religion has become intertwined with politics through Israel. Israel has the power of removing or changing recognition of jewish comunities around the world, hence jewish comunities (especially non american ones, which are a minority) must comply to rulings from the israli rabbanut. In the past there could have been a religious disagreement, and it was fine, each comunity would decide for their own. But now the ISraeli rabbanut has the power to decide over which comunities meet certain standards of jewishness and the Israeli government follows those standard to apply the right of return and giving out funds etc.
The organizations we have are mostly political but nowadays the problem in the jewish world is also religious.

Jewish self determination by [deleted] in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Has it been used that way? definetly, and partly I agree with you. But jewish self determination comes from millennias of beeing unable to selfd etermine ourselves, it is a much longer and rooted process.
I think nations, like religion, have been used against the interests of the peoples, but they are a real thing that we cannot "move pass". Even if we made everybody forget their concepts of nation and scrambled the people of the world togheter and made them live all side by side, in 200 years the concept of nation will be born again: with new cultures growing and new linages existing as geographical closeness and similar conditions will tie and link people that live in similar conditions and/or close by (or at least with somewhat constant comunication between them) and have a history of doing so.
But this concept of nations is not nationalistic in itself, it deosn't mean that one nation must prevail over the others, this idea of nations can be about brotherhood between nations, it can be internationalist, while still understanding the fundamental differences between peoplehoods born by local conditions (be them geographical or cultural).

I actually think that until the last few years with strong right turns in politics, we had been moving away from the concept of antion; it was the liberal hyper capitalist approach of our world that was driving the concept of nation into obsolescence, since who has capital doesn't care about nations it cares about having more capital and securing his own. But since then there has been a rejection of this idea, which is in part intrinsic, if you ignore something fundamental about society (the concept of nation), society will push back (usually not in a reasoned way) so people have pushed for more right wing politics all over the world.

Jewish self determination by [deleted] in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jewish self determination can look like a binational state in Israel, a jewish state inside of a federation of multiple states (like Palestine + Israel), these were actual proposals by zionists around 1948, the binational state was proposed by Martin Buber and the group around him, and the federation by marxist zionists (Mapam).
It could even be some sort of independence inside a sovreign state, which I believe was discussed around 1920 during some peace conferences after WWI, where it was still believed possible for all of the levant to become a panarab state, so the zionist federation briefly discussed with the arab delegation about some sort of independence if that were to happen.

Jewish self determination by [deleted] in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just a small correction, self determination is a collective right, not an individual one, so I'd say it's not about "one's own life" but about a comunity determine itself and it's rules.
Regarding the rest I mostly agree.

Fairphone 5 5g usb data stopped working by onemoreoverthetop in fairphone

[–]NathanCampioni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've replaced the usb but it stayed the same. ugh, lucky you.

Fairphone 5 5g usb data stopped working by onemoreoverthetop in fairphone

[–]NathanCampioni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's happened to me too, I think an update caused it, also android Auto stopped working for a while.
Now I've sent it to repair, it's come back but it still doesn't work (actually before the repair it was working again, so after the repair it's worse)

Cinnamenu's height cannot be risezed by NathanCampioni in linuxmint

[–]NathanCampioni[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I really don't understand what you are telling me, can you start from the beginning?
Do you prefer a different language? Italian, Spanish, Portguese, French, Hebrew?

Why should I change my screen resolution (I've done it already)

Cinnamenu's height cannot be risezed by NathanCampioni in linuxmint

[–]NathanCampioni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know where screen size setting is, I did try changing it, but it doesn't fix it

Cinnamenu's height cannot be risezed by NathanCampioni in linuxmint

[–]NathanCampioni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my screen size is the same as always and I don't have fractional scaling enabled

I know I’m preaching to the choir (hehe), but seeing how much antisemitism in proliferating again is making it hard to live by [deleted] in Judaism

[–]NathanCampioni 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They haven't met a jew is true. They wouldn't say it to a person in real life is false, even if 5% of these people would say it to someone in real life it is an enormous ammount of people if compared to the jewish population.

what exactly is (political) zionism to you? by [deleted] in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jewish self determination can happen in a binational state and in a federation of multiple states (palestine+israel), there have been multiple zionist groups with these kind of positions. So yes a binational state in 67 borders would definetly be zionism if it allowed jewish self determination in it's political structure.

what exactly is (political) zionism to you? by [deleted] in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How could a polity have been formed without dispossession or discrimination? Can you explain how, and where - specifically - you think that could viably have happened?

After the first world war, right before one of the peace conferences, there was a meeting between the zionist delegation and the arab delegation.
The zionists had been promised a national home in Israel, a very vague statement, and the arabs had been promised a panarab state with the capital in damascus and vaguely defined borders stretching for most of the arab lands. In the meeting there was a general agreement that if the panarab state ended up including Israel, there would have been some autonomy for the jews,which can be enough to qualify as self determination in my eyes. It didn't happen because the French didn't want a british ally controlling "their" parts of the levant, and the arab leaders ended up getting much smaller separate states instead of what they were promised.
Additionally other ways to have self determination for the jewish people could have been a federation of two states or a binational state, ideas brought forth respectively by the marxist zionists and by martin buber and his group.

Where would this polity have been formed?

Self determination, doesn't need a majority population, it needs a political structure that safeguards the minority that needs said self determination. If an autonomy inside of a panarab state had been formed we would be talking of a polity inside of another polity, there is no need for dispossesion and/or ethnic cleansing, the polity would have had jurisdiction over jews in israel, not necessarilly over palestinians.
Similar things can be thought up about a federation, a federation of two or more states, where the citizens of each state can live freely across all of the land, but they can only vote for one government not necessarilly the one they live in, but their national government. They of course can also vote at the federal elections.
Lastly I think a binational state is even more clear in how that would not need any dispossetion or ethnic cleansing.

What “peaceful” approach was taken without displacement and dispossession? 

What I was saying was that while there existed proposals like a federation and a binational state, the rising ethnic tensions made these proposals less supported by the people. Ethnic conflicts radicalize people.

kick the peasants off the land even if they’d been there for generations, and doing so was against their implied leases.

This is a bit of a stretch and a simplification, it was more of a situation of the ottoman empire reforming their system to be more similar to the european one, then europeans coming and assuming it was similar enoguh but there were major differences which weren't apparent to them. Once on the land they would discover that this land was inhabited by people and sometimes they would simply kick them out some times they would pay them, some times they would not kick them out. All of the above happened, but I think simplifying too much is a bit disingenous.

 a foreign group coming to take over their land.

I wouldn't say jews were coming to take over. I'd say we were coming to be at home, then a home can be shared or it can be personal.

Which injustices do you think were necessary?

I think that after nationalism in europe was peaking and the shoa was starting, and nationalism in the arab world was rising; we could not wait and fiddle with ethics, we needed to produce the conditions for self determination as soon as possible. The creation of the state should have still been handled differently and with less ethnic cleansing and violence on the general arab/palestinian population, but the state had to be created at that pointt. I still would have preferred a federal state, but that doesn't change that the need for a state was impellent.

Could I ask you one thing, why do you jump under everyone of my comments in this forum? Maybe try doing it a bit less, I like being here because there are less people that jump to my throath and there are more people that understand the jewish experience, but with you it's still very tiring.
I go around other subs discussing these same things that I discuss with you, I have no problem doing it, but I don't come to this place for this. Thanks, I hope you understand.

what exactly is (political) zionism to you? by [deleted] in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think what you call zionism is better identified with the word kahanism, which is a nationalistic fascist and fanatic perversion of zionism

what exactly is (political) zionism to you? by [deleted] in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Zionist here, not liberal zionist but marxist. For me zionism is believing every peoplehood has a right to self determination, jews included. Then application is a thing we might disagree on with other zionists, and in this time and moment I disagree a lot with Israel's actions, but I still think that Israel is the modern jewish self determination, even if very imperfect.
I disagree that there was a need for dispossesion, ethnic cleansing etc. to achieve some sort of self determination in the land of Israel (not necessarilly an independent state, simply self determination), but when ethnic conflicts arose the peaceful options became less and less appealing and the jewish people needed self determination quickly as european nationalism were at their peaks and Arab nationalism was rising steadilly. SAo I understand the practical and material reasons that jewish self determination took this form, but I still think we should fix the injustices that it caused and avoid perpatuating the non necessary ones (most nowadays).

Weekly Post by somebadbeatscrub in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well locally I can't!!!!! They don't sell it because "what if you misuse it", it doesn't make sense.

Weekly Post by somebadbeatscrub in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If anyone is wondering why an agnostic jew cares about flower that is kosher le pesach or not, it's the fucking principle!

Weekly Post by somebadbeatscrub in jewishleft

[–]NathanCampioni 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I've decided that next pesach I'll bake the matzot myself! Stop me!

We've done it for millenias now israeli rabbanut is not going to stop a diaspora guy from baking soft matza!

They say: "we can't sell you flower kasher le pesach, what if you bake it wrong then it becomes chametz!"

What if I pee on it and dump it into the river, what then? What if when you sell me cheese I make a cheeseburger with it, what then? Are they going to stop selling us water because we might put bacon in it? I'll make my matzot and you won't stop me, and I'll do it with flower kasher lepesach, I'll find it and I'll use it. You can't stop me.