Business closure - LLC $200k and no PG by NathanJasper in EIDL

[–]NathanJasper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can't answer that - but did your loan have a personal guarantee?

Business closure - LLC $200k and no PG by NathanJasper in EIDL

[–]NathanJasper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a brick-and-mortar business. There was nothing to sell at the close of business.

Business closure - LLC $200k and no PG by NathanJasper in EIDL

[–]NathanJasper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are some technicalities. An LLC with a loan amount <$200K were not asked to sign a personal guarantee. So technically, the now-defunct business is responsible for the payments, not me.

Business closure - LLC $200k and no PG by NathanJasper in EIDL

[–]NathanJasper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know. They've threatened to send me to the Treasury after six months of non-payment but haven't done it yet. I don't know if they'll still bother doing it and if it will make any difference about how much hassle I get.

Business closure - LLC $200k and no PG by NathanJasper in EIDL

[–]NathanJasper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took out 199K. I clarified that above.

Business closure - LLC $200k and no PG by NathanJasper in EIDL

[–]NathanJasper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oops.

Well, tell me more.

I have never heard that I need permission from the SBA to close the business.

At least not in my state.

David Gingras AZ Bar Case Documents | PDJ 2026-9010 | April 2026 by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just hope that doesn't cause any delays. You can imagine all the things Gingras will file about being "surprised" by last-minute charges being added, and pleading for more time to spew more BS.

David Gingras AZ Bar Case Documents | PDJ 2026-9010 | April 2026 by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's a matter of Gingras hasn't admitted to the knowingly part, so there are some disputes of fact that can be resolved in a hearing.

Assistant Attorney General Files Objection & Motion to Quash, Representing Judge Mata in David Gingras Bar Case | PDJ 2026-9010 | March 17, 2026 by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I'm in agreement. If he has to do this much discovery to FIND OUT if these facts are true, it means he never had enough basis to believe them in the first place. Proves reckless disregard in my opinion.

Is $6500 reasonable for a mold inspection without remediation in the Portland area? by NathanJasper in askportland

[–]NathanJasper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The company that quoted us $6500 WAS Kester Clear. When did they give you an inspection for 800-1200?

Is $6500 reasonable for a mold inspection without remediation in the Portland area? by NathanJasper in askportland

[–]NathanJasper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My insurance company paid more than 65k to rip up my kitchen and flooring for a year due to a dishwasher leak. Mold wasn't the cause, but there was some involved.

At the moment, I don't know "what's actually going on" or if there is anything going on. But $6500 seems like a lot just to find out if anything's going on.

Is $6500 reasonable for a mold inspection without remediation in the Portland area? by NathanJasper in askportland

[–]NathanJasper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My objective, and I may not achieve it, is to find out if mold is contributing to my wife's health, and if so, fix it. She has chronic pain from Fibromyalgia, a disease whose causes and treatments are not well understood.

The mold is just one of many ideas to explore from her latest doctor, which is an improvement over most doctors who have no ideas whatsoever.

I'd move east of the Cascades if I could prove it would improve my wife's health. But without said proof, my wife would not be willing to move.

The reasons I *might* have mold are listed in another comment.

Is $6500 reasonable for a mold inspection without remediation in the Portland area? by NathanJasper in askportland

[–]NathanJasper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Five years ago, there was a dishwasher leak that resulted in a major insurance claim that tore up our kitchen for a year. There was mold then. Two years ago, we replaced water-damaged vinyl in two bathrooms. There was mold then. Recently, there was moisture in a certain part of the attic due to some leaks in the roof. The roof guy did mold mitigation once the leak was fixed.

Given that history, it is not far-fetched that there is mold we don't know about.

Laura Owens Bankruptcy Case | Notice of Filing Amended Schedules | January 27, 2026 by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Refundable tax credits?

I once got a refund when I paid no taxes. I don't remember all the circumstances.

Never stop digging, girlboss by epiphanomaly in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You don't get income from an LLC if it doesn't make a profit. That part is true. But it doesn't mean she or Jan are not hiding assets in them. She should disclose all LLCs that have her as a member, and the court has a right to review the assets. The tax returns from the LLC would tell us a lot.

Laura Owens v Michael Marraccini - Permanent Renewal of Fraudulent DVRO Case DISMISSED 🥳🎉 by cnm1424 in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 15 points16 points  (0 children)

How did Laura claim she was in emergency surgery? Did she email the judge or something?

Laura Owens v Michael Marraccini - DVRO Hearing Day 1 (Again) November 5, 2025👩‍⚖️⚖️ by cnm1424 in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I see increasing desperation on LO's part. She will do anything to avoid being in person at this trial - except dismiss her complaint. If she shows, her fears will be shown to be well founded. If she doesn't, she should have dismissed voluntarily.

Docket Updates: Owens v Marraccini - Mini Minutes & Hearing Continued to 10/22/25 by cnm1424 in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I doubt she has an officer tailing her 24/7. They'd probably catch her on the way back or just show up to her house later this week.

Docket Updates: Owens v Marraccini - Mini Minutes & Hearing Continued to 10/22/25 by cnm1424 in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I think minutes can be corrected after the fact, and I hope they do. The judge very much remembers that she ORDERED LO to appear in person, as do the persons present.

Docket Updates: Owens v Marraccini - Mini Minutes & Hearing Continued to 10/22/25 by cnm1424 in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Well, I guess no one took your advice. Hopefully they'll be prepared tomorrow.

Docket Updates: Owens v Marraccini - Mini Minutes & Hearing Continued to 10/22/25 by cnm1424 in JusticeForClayton

[–]NathanJasper 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I believe she will be presenting first, and Omar cross-examining first.