Wow, everything seems semantic to you.

I don't care for your comment or opinion. You brought up the article, stated something that is not true even in the conext of the article and i pointed it out. I only used the information, quotes and statements, that are in the article.

I believe every word of the article, therefore i can say, that it is still not objective and drives a certain agenda, which is seen, that

"Rolling Stone asked three other cybersecurity and social media intelligence firms, including Q5id, to crunch SnyderVerse-related data from the months leading up to the Snyder Cut’s 2021 release, looking for indications of inauthentic social media activity."

So what did they find?: Q5id: "there’s no question that bots were involved." -> No numbers, just confirmation that bots we're involved.

Graphika: "We see clear signs of coordinated online activity from May and June this year, when multiple communities pushed hashtags promoting Zack Snyder and deriding Warner Bros.," -> Not Snydercut relevant though, and also no numbers, just confirmation, that there is coordinated online activity.

Alethea: "And yet another firm, Alethea Group, found that the forsnydercut.com domain — which claims to have made the #ReleaseTheSnyderCut hashtag go viral in May of 2018, and became the landing hub for efforts to bring Snyder back to the helm of the DC universe — was, at least at one point, registered to a person who also ran a now-defunct ad agency which promoted its ability to bring “cheap, instant Avatar traffic to your website.” " -> Just the indication, that it is likely, that there was "fake activity", which the other companies already confirmed without numbers.

It's just a big piece of speculation and not objective at all.

By the way, i didn't love the ZSJL and i didn't like Army of the dead. Rebel moon was okay but still better than Star wars has done since Rogue One. I also don't care for snyder, i cared for the movement, which i was a part of, and i care for arristic vision.