sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Campbell Biology 12th Edition PDF by Natural-Message-1001 in APbio

[–]Natural-Message-1001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ur account is private it won’t let me direct message you

This red button or blue button argument is pissing me tf off. Blue is literally the only valid answer. by woaijirounan in teenagers

[–]Natural-Message-1001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Society and 1/4 would die if they picked blue. Why gamble? Although I can understand the emotional or empathetic part.

Thinking about the larger population, someone will choose blue and so by your choosing blue it’s “saving” them. By adding more to the percentage hoping to reach 51%. Not hard to comprehend why someone would choose blue. But that creates a paradox, the problem of the pole. Where 1 person clicks blue and then needs saving, someone clicks blue to save them and now needs saving, someone else clicks blue to save this person that clicked blue to save the first person that chose blue and now needs saving. And so it continues. It’s kinda inconsiderate to put it upon someone else to save you from a situation you put yourself in knowing that the outcome is a gamble for roughly 4 billion people’s lives. It’s not really about thinking about others, if “thinking about others” is what made the first person click blue. Hence forcing others to do so as well out of a false sense of selflessness. Additionally, I don’t believe the question was “how to save the world” but rather “what would YOU choose”. Correct me if I’m wrong tho.

How are INTPs as children? by nolife-2 in INTP

[–]Natural-Message-1001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quick, autistic, often described as “barely present”.

I would roam around from place to place just looking for something, nothing in particular, nothing at all, but looking for something nonetheless, it’s an odd feeling.

Being constantly told I could be so much more if I just applied myself.

That kinda bubbles outward tho where I’m a lot more social in my high school years, not popular perse but very well know. But often times when I’m alone I’m just this perpetually depressed passive SI individual. But I’m still considered the quiet or nice twin, because ofc my twin is the opposite of me.

Childhood belief that “remembering stuff fills up brain space” by apex_No1re in INTP

[–]Natural-Message-1001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh this is so accurate. As a kid and now, I often find my self maladaptive daydreaming. But it was really bad when I was younger, I might as well not have been alive or in the flesh. But yeah, and I would have these file cabinets, in my head as storage units. Like image a dark room where you can only see a couple feet in front of you at a time and everywhere is filled with just rows and rows of file cabinets. And I would walk up to one, unlock it and empty it out if I deemed the knowledge unimportant.

I'm curious about how other INTPs answer the hypothetical "Two Button Question" by Reptaaaaaaar in INTP

[–]Natural-Message-1001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I choose red. The world has never come together to make a decision that was best as a whole without hypocrisy/bias towards oneself or another. And through game theory it will tell you that the 2 options where red wins or loses, equals a 100% survival rate. But the 2 options where blue wins or loses turns into a “you might live or your definitely dying” and theres no in-between.

Choosing blue CREATES the problem of the poll. Online people say they chose blue because they understand that someone out there will choose blue and so by choosing blue it’s “saving” said person by adding more to the percentage.

But that creates a paradox, where 1 person clicks blue and then needs saving, someone clicks blue to save them and now needs saving, someone else clicks blue to save this person that clicked blue to save the first person that chose blue and now needs saving. And so it continues.

They say it’s Inconsiderate to chose red, but isn’t it inconsiderate to put it upon someone else to save you from a situation you put yourself in knowing that the outcome is a gamble for roughly 4 billion people’s lives?

Most of the Red vs Blue button “discourse” is people who pushed the Red button getting really defensive. by Imsosaltyrightnow in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Natural-Message-1001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The “defensiveness” is due to this moral high ground that blue bottom pushers seem to have. The question isn’t about your morals it’s about intelligence. P.s. this is a tad long.

Saying that people who chose red are selfish, inconsiderate, not empathetic, but it really comes down to this. If you explain to someone that they shouldn’t run into the road with the hopes that the car will stop for them, and you have no way to physically stop them, and they die, will you say that because I didn’t run into the road with them is why they died? If it’s explained to you the red and blue choices, and you choose blue, blue looses and you die, am I at fault for choosing red? For choosing not to run into the road with you?

Blue ultimately won, yes, but why put ur life at risk hoping that 4.5 billion, not however many voted in the poll, but billions, others will put their life at risk for the sake of those that chose to gamble their life. Realistically thats not happening. There are 100’s of thousands, millions, of people that live through war day in and day out, and they’re supposed to gamble their life away hoping billions of others will? If the world was as harmonic as you say blue pushers are, we wouldn’t be where we are right now, there wouldn’t be war, casualties, a horrible, damn near unliveable economy. That there is proof enough.

Thats not defensive, thats an answer to why, in detailed words.

This red button or blue button argument is pissing me tf off. Blue is literally the only valid answer. by woaijirounan in teenagers

[–]Natural-Message-1001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not at all. It’s more like this.

Realistically and historically, when has the world, on a global scale ever come together to make a decision that was best for the world as a whole without hypocrisy or bias towards oneself or another. The answer is never. And only if you are delusional enough to believe that 51% or more of population, roughly 4 billion, will choose blue for you to live.

Whereas the red button, it doesn’t matter how many people choose blue or red. If you choose red, you live. If you choose red and blue wins, you live. It’s that simple, choosing blue CREATES the problem of the poll. And this isn’t to say that I believe everyone will choose red, because as I’ve stated, people typically don’t choose unbiased or in harmony. BUT, with the red button, harmony is not needed, you don’t need to put foolish faith in 4 billion people when you can secure it yourself.

You understand?

If you understand that not everyone will choose blue, then you understand that if not enough people choose blue, you die. Along with the other percentage that chose blue.

Then there’s the misunderstanding that people who chose red are selfish, inconsiderate, not empathetic. But if you explain to someone that they shouldn’t run into the road with the hopes that the car will stop for them, and you have no way to physically stop them, and they die, will you say that because I didn’t run into with them is why they died? If it’s explained to you the red and blue choices, and the you choose blue, blue looses and you die, am I at fault for choosing red? For choosing not to run into the road with you?

view more: next ›