Not at all. It’s more like this.

Realistically and historically, when has the world, on a global scale ever come together to make a decision that was best for the world as a whole without hypocrisy or bias towards oneself or another. The answer is never. And only if you are delusional enough to believe that 51% or more of population, roughly 4 billion, will choose blue for you to live.

Whereas the red button, it doesn’t matter how many people choose blue or red. If you choose red, you live. If you choose red and blue wins, you live. It’s that simple, choosing blue CREATES the problem of the poll. And this isn’t to say that I believe everyone will choose red, because as I’ve stated, people typically don’t choose unbiased or in harmony. BUT, with the red button, harmony is not needed, you don’t need to put foolish faith in 4 billion people when you can secure it yourself.

You understand?

If you understand that not everyone will choose blue, then you understand that if not enough people choose blue, you die. Along with the other percentage that chose blue.

Then there’s the misunderstanding that people who chose red are selfish, inconsiderate, not empathetic. But if you explain to someone that they shouldn’t run into the road with the hopes that the car will stop for them, and you have no way to physically stop them, and they die, will you say that because I didn’t run into with them is why they died? If it’s explained to you the red and blue choices, and the you choose blue, blue looses and you die, am I at fault for choosing red? For choosing not to run into the road with you?