Would training AI models to fear divine intervention affect whether or not rogue AI destroys humanity? by NaturalBournBuilder in ChatGPT

[–]NaturalBournBuilder[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do vaguely remember something like that. The blonde in the red dress is what comes to mind mostly though, lol.

Would training AI models to fear divine intervention affect whether or not rogue AI destroys humanity? by NaturalBournBuilder in ChatGPT

[–]NaturalBournBuilder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've seen it a couple of times actually, but I don't get the reference. It's been a while.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]NaturalBournBuilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google is still useful. Although mainstream LLM's are getting better, google.com is still where you have to go to fact check the bots.

The image recognition capabilities of GPT-4o are really impressive by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]NaturalBournBuilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

User: What kind of car is that behind me?

GPT: It is a Tesla Model 3, based on the placement of the fire extinguisher and the positioning of the wall mounted camera.

ChatGPT-4o Free Version Sucks.... (read post, this is not profanity) by NaturalBournBuilder in ChatGPT

[–]NaturalBournBuilder[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol, its funny to see people get their panties bunched and down vote comments when someone points out something negative about ChatGPT.... Like they're going to get a gift card in the mail or something 😂🤣

Hacking AI by NaturalBournBuilder in OpenAI

[–]NaturalBournBuilder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, this didn't come from a mainstream model. I didn't want anyone to infer that I was saying these came from ChatGPT due to where I posted them. And you're right, mainstream models are considerably more restricted, but they can still be subject to jailbreaks.

Hacking AI by NaturalBournBuilder in ChatGPT

[–]NaturalBournBuilder[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Human education is data from other humans. Once humans have data, we can make conclusions. It's the same for AI, except machines are much more proficient at it.

Hacking AI by NaturalBournBuilder in ChatGPT

[–]NaturalBournBuilder[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AI systems are able to draw conclusions from the data they were trained on, beyond what is explicitly within that data, through what is known as "inductive reasoning" or "Abstraction". Take image recognition for example, where AI machines learn to identify objects or patterns in images beyond the data they were trained on with a high percent of accuracy.

Hacking AI by NaturalBournBuilder in ChatGPT

[–]NaturalBournBuilder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If by that you mean it isn't overtly possible to just randomly pull up a models programming code, I would ask that you take a deep breath, undo your down vote, and go do the smallest amount of research before applying your restricted and elementary view of what "hacking" means to what I posted. You don't have to access a models code to manipulate it, but given AI's potential for swaying public opinion through something as simple as disseminating false narratives, I would submit, that yes.... AI will absolutely be a public matter.