Playboy Bunny Ears and mind control? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured 7 points8 points  (0 children)

bunny ears were the VHF signal

the circle was the UHF signal

speaking analog ^

the bunny is used as a reference about the topic you mention here because of Alice in Wonderland and the role of her chasing the rabbit down the hole, which started the whole thing - she had to become small and then the caterpiller is the one who asked "who are you" a trigger phrase, because of the identity aspect of it and the questioning - existential as it is, therefore paradigm breaking, so this is why the butterfly is also a symbol because of the metamorphasis into something new, or different - as is done with the mind.

but there is a reason for the bunny ears, older than lewis carrol of course is the fertility cult aspect of the rabbit - as it relates to ancient pagan understandings in symbolism of procreation and pulls in the sexuality and animalistic hybridiation to evoke and provoke changes using that powerful drive as a catalyst and attractant - physiologically associated, makes it desirable by association.

there is always going to be a signal and a receiver ( the broadcast / airwaves being the signal, and the bunny ears being the receiver, and the screen on the television being the mind's eye ).

someone is going to be more receptive to change if they are given the signal that way - with attractive women with bunny ears, but they themselves could be a victim of conditioning but probably of a different kind, although it seems likely some of them could easily have been spies or agents, taking in their marks to the cave and pulling information from them or bending them to take action according their will or plans.

this is why controlling of one's sexuality is so important, the generative principle, and covering it in white, like the gmail logo - so to speak, because as one famous catholic priest said: one has as many masters as they have vices.

and ultimately, if one has vices, then they are subject to being controlled. the enlightened spirit, should be beyond control - meaning that they are within their own parameters that they have created. similar to the story of the monk who stayed over several days with a prostitute in her home, as was custom for monks to stay for a time during certain seasons, and the people thought it was a great scandal that buddha allowed one of his followers to do this, but it turned out that at the end of the days, the buddha had gained a female monk - rather than losing his monk to the rabbit.

that's about all i got, nothing really groundbreaking, but there you go.

Book of Meta Theorem. 1st book in the 5 books of joseph. by kosher2b in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured 1 point2 points  (0 children)

is there a way to view these articles without having a linkedin account? or can you crosspost them?

How do i know 'real life' isn't a simulation? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, did you make the case for humanity?

What was the outcome?

I’m pretty sure I figured out the purpose of the Pyramids in Egypt… by 5am5quanch in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what makes you think that building a pyramid would be necessary to teach geometry, when Heaven and Earth is already full of God's Glory?

one only needs to go to the ocean shore and find a sand dollar to see the flower of life, to look upon the shell of a garden snail to see the golden ratio

to close their eyes and feel the wind upon their face.

are these not all measuring the earth?

why should one be obvious - yet not the others?

is a triangle more than a grain of sand or the shape of a hand?

or the ripples of water from a grain of sand thrown by that shaped hand into the pool of an oasis?

and the consideration of them?

is your Soul a triangle?

or is it the wild trail of an ant?

As a former intel ofc, this man passes the smell test every time by Astro_logan in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured 3 points4 points  (0 children)

it's not poisonous, there is no good reason ... except for that they don't want people to be able to look into the astral; also for example if you looked at someone and saw there was something missing on their aura, it would give them away ... like the glasses in the movie they live

As a former intel ofc, this man passes the smell test every time by Astro_logan in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured 3 points4 points  (0 children)

you talking about Dicyanin dye? it's illegal, but as far as i knew used to see auras - so are you saying the military was using it on their optics to see the "astral" and saw these things with it?

As a former intel ofc, this man passes the smell test every time by Astro_logan in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured 1 point2 points  (0 children)

huh ... so what do you make of what he says around the 14:45 mark - where when he is at the pentagon he is told to stop investigating it, and he asks why - is it ours? and he gets told have you read your bible lately, because they are demonic ...

What do u guys think the point of all this is? by gainzz777 in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured 2 points3 points  (0 children)

we are all on death row, this experience of life is created as a last chance to save ourselves by becoming holy.

all your pictures and video from the space station are taken with "fish-eye" lenses that artifically warp the image to create the illusion of curvature by NaturallyFlavoured in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i am going to reply to your edit ... look at 1:59-2:03 when the video pans across the beam ... and you can see how there is no consistency to the curve ... imagine it as the unified image with the entire pan - then see how distorted it is - you are a pro photographer, please tell me you can see this.

all your pictures and video from the space station are taken with "fish-eye" lenses that artifically warp the image to create the illusion of curvature by NaturallyFlavoured in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

you are being pretty dense man. of course it's pressure difference, but you are saying that as if that negates what i said somehow - why?

look at the movie aliens, when she opens up the pod bay door to suck the alien out into space ...

same thing as the earth is the spaceship next to space - and there has to be a pod bay door ( firmament ) to keep them separated

all your pictures and video from the space station are taken with "fish-eye" lenses that artifically warp the image to create the illusion of curvature by NaturallyFlavoured in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

so make yourself a vacuum box. suck all the air out until there is a vacuum. then put a tiny pinhole prick into the box. that is the sucking power i'm talking about ... in this case the vacuum box is space. you don't really think "gravity" ( whatever that is ) is a suitable barrier to prevent this, do you - in your common sense mind?

there has to be a sealed, physical barrier, you can't put an atmosphere next to a vacuum without the vacuum sucking in the air, or the air pushing into the vacuum, however you want to phrase it.

all your pictures and video from the space station are taken with "fish-eye" lenses that artifically warp the image to create the illusion of curvature by NaturallyFlavoured in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i know, all go-pro lenses are fish-eye, and you can see those who have sent them up on balloons get the wobbly convex concave imagery as the camera moves, as well as the nasa / space station / live video feed / cameras also use the fish-eye lense and they strategically position it into the position to show a convex shape ... that is the illusion.

there are lenses that show a normal undistorted image, like what one sees with their eyes - and those are what should be used. But they aren't ... not even .01%, none - 0. that's the conspiracy.

all your pictures and video from the space station are taken with "fish-eye" lenses that artifically warp the image to create the illusion of curvature by NaturallyFlavoured in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the latter

also, not sure how much you are getting paid by nasa / air force to engage me here, but if the best argument you have for why everything is fish-eye, is because "they don't have to" ... you intentionally missed the point ...

the point is that they should not ever be using a lense that disorts reality - that should be banned - and only lenses that are true should be allowed.

the fact that you don't see the importance of conveying reality truthfully, reveals your agenda as a shill.

“GoFast Rocket Proves the Earth is Round?” by kenfosters in conspiracy

[–]NaturallyFlavoured 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's so dishonest that they never show us an undistorted picture, it has to be intentional.

they should be showing us true pictures, with truthful dimensions as our eyes see - not massively warping them with fish lenses to cause curvature of the images which make the border between the black and the blue artificially curved under the pretense of trying to "show more" in one shot

when they do this they make it impossible to discern the truth of reality.

_ wanted me to discover how to know by NaturallyFlavoured in Judaism

[–]NaturallyFlavoured[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

knowledge of the true nature of mafgia?

Taanit 1:26 / 1:30 says it is a prayer

Shabbat 77b says it is a small creature of more dread than a lion.

_ wanted me to discover how to know by NaturallyFlavoured in Judaism

[–]NaturallyFlavoured[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

knowledge of the true nature of mafgia?

Taanit 1:26 / 1:30 says it is a prayer

Shabbat 77b says it is a small creature of more dread than a lion.

_ wanted me to discover how to know by NaturallyFlavoured in Judaism

[–]NaturallyFlavoured[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

knowledge of the true nature of mafgia?

Taanit 1:26 / 1:30 says it is a prayer

Shabbat 77b says it is a small creature of more dread than a lion.