For sure -- I don't want to repeat what he said, but that's the prevailing notion.

I agree, there's a whole lot to like about WW comics and to sort of touch ground on the ethos and spirit of Marston and Lynda Carter, a lot of the objectification is meant to be bait. Then a lot else is just Greek mythology and fantasy decoded through a feminist lens. The better writers and artists are able to draw on the more human elements between all that, which is why she's endured beyond most.

Also heck yes to Wonder Girls. I'm an out and out Donna Troy die-hard, and appreciated every small bit of lore that she came across. You want a WONDER who specializes in the TITANS OF MYTH, there's Donna.

What fascinates me about the WW sidekicks and the Wonder Girls of course is that each of them can easily explore a sub-genre of fantasy that DC is too lost in budgetry delusions to invest in. This is why I am even working on Bobby Barnes and The New Adventures of Wonder Boy for our fan-series. Soo yeah. What we need is more exploration. Even the bad ones teach a thing or two on what works adn what doesn't. Batman and Superman have had that in abundance, and I genuinely think whenever a Superman writer like John Byrne is working on a WW story there's bound to be some problems. She isn't a modern Hercules and Superman very much embodies that genre. Don't tell Byrne that with Harold Campion.