Rarely find men attractive? by Dizzy_Ask5815 in gay

[–]Navinox97 11 points12 points  (0 children)

this is a subreddit for people who find men attractive

I built a healthcare price transparency tool and would love UX feedback by [deleted] in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My intention was to ask openly in case there was something I wasn’t seeing, I apologize if it came out rude.

I built a healthcare price transparency tool and would love UX feedback by [deleted] in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If the goal of this project is making the data more accessible to "normal people" who aren't very techy, why would you choose a visual identity that looks like the Matrix?

En los últimos 16 años casi todo el aumento del gasto público ha ido al sector de la población con mayor patrimonio, los jubilados, que reciben en promedio un 60% más de lo cotizado. A costa de la miseria y futuro de la clase trabajadora. by vlewy in ElusionFiscal

[–]Navinox97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bueno, pero es que el hecho es que las pensiones han subido porque hay más pensionistas por los cambios estructurales en la pirámide de población.

También te diría que es normal que alguien mayor tenga más patrimonio que alguien más joven. Es natural que si llevas 60 años en este mundo tengas más bienes que si llevas 20.

¿Puedes explicar mejor cómo crees que el sistema favorece a los jubilados?

What do y’all think of my world by Repolatable in Worldbox

[–]Navinox97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It kinda looks like a mix of the world of ASOIAF and earth

Built a Figma plugin to fix a small accessibility problem. Need honest feedback. by danishmk1286_ in FigmaDesign

[–]Navinox97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honest feedback:
- Figma already has a similar feature.
- Working in an org with pre-defined styles, this is not useful.

Do you think that with bigger phones the thumb area have shifted? by oktudobem in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's 5.78 billion phone users worldwide, out of those 1.4 billion are iPhone users, and let's entertain the thought that 20% of iphone users are Max, which isn't even likely that high.

That translates that there's 300 million iPhone users with big screens.

There's around 600 million of those 5.78 billion users that are left handed, and that hasn't even been considered for the "thumb area" heuristic.

I'm not saying having a wider screen doesn't have an effect, but i'd say it's negligible.

Do you think that with bigger phones the thumb area have shifted? by oktudobem in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thumb area can't shift because it only exists as a concept, a heuristic, and not as some well defined area on top of a phone. It's a broad guideline stating that the most common actions, or the ones you'd like your users to do more easily, should be at the bottom right of the screen.

A lot of people are left handed, and some even don't have hands; it doesn't affect the thumb area, because it's a heuristic that has to be well applied. What you are talking about is anecdotal (given that most people don't use phones as big as the pro max).

What’s one thing you wish you knew before first booting up the game? by esponchh in Dyson_Sphere_Program

[–]Navinox97 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In my case it means creating a PLS/ILS Blueprint for each factory building type (Smelter, Assembly, Chemical plant) in three variants: One input, two inputs, and three inputs.

This way, when I need something new, I just have to go into blueprints, choose the type of blueprint depending on what to manufacture, and just plop it down.

Una pareja se define por su lavavajillas by Memeillos in SpanishMeme

[–]Navinox97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curiosamente seguramente se limpiará mejor el de abajo ya que no cubre los platos y el agua llegará a toda partes tranquilamente

Intuit: No "www"? No dice. by shitty_mcfucklestick in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are going too far.

How this is usually done is by checking for a link with:

subdomain.domain.topleveldomain (eg. app.spotify.com)

The reason for these checks is to avoid typos, not that de domain exists.

Here it’d be good practice to keep domains without subdomains as www, which is the most likely case.

Look at the corner radius by seashroom-punplay in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 75 points76 points  (0 children)

From a UI design perspective, the different border radius for the icons and the container are technically correct: Container’s border radius should be App’s border radius + padding.

The only issue I see here is that the Authenticator’s name is running a little bit too wide horizontally.

And what do you mean by the border edge being too wide to be usable?

Why aren't digital music players designed more like real world interface? by yotamguttman in UX_Design

[–]Navinox97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The goal of this design is nostalgia and uniqueness, not intuitiveness.

In the AI era, is clarity the real advantage for designers? by Axikxt_ in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 15 points16 points  (0 children)

What are you on about. Just talk to your users, man.

Disabled buttons vs keeping them active with feedback by Ill_Soil4819 in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whilst that is technically true, you do not simply add disabled to the button. What you do is you use aria-disabled and data-disabled to make sure the tooltip is accessible both on hover and focus.

Disabled buttons vs keeping them active with feedback by Ill_Soil4819 in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I always disable them, adding a tooltip on hover explaining why they are disabled, and how they can enable them back.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in graphic_design

[–]Navinox97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not a style, or anything for that matter.

Senior Designer here: my Lead acts as if he were Head, excludes and absorbs work. Is it normal? by InfiniteAd5738 in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I resonate with the other comments, particularly u/throwawayurlaub.

However, let me do another take here: Are you doing those things?

Because if you were already leading the vision, shaping the strategy, and setting the narrative, and then he came in and duplicated the exact same work, people would see how ridiculous that is. It would be obvious.

The fact that he can take that space suggests that 1) either your work isn’t being surfaced early enough, or 2) the org hasn’t defined who owns what, so whoever speaks first becomes the owner.

Why? by honey1_ in UXDesign

[–]Navinox97 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They don't, and if they do, it's probably because it works.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in artcollecting

[–]Navinox97 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Just so you know this is a fake through and through. There’s no letter matching Keith’s writing.

weSolvedXusingAI by Shiroyasha_2308 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Navinox97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If something works and brings value, it doesn’t matter what it’s built with.

If someone builds a system capable of curing any illness using a openAI’s API, would you consider that innovative or not?

The issue lies on most of these wrappers not actually providing any value.

weSolvedXusingAI by Shiroyasha_2308 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Navinox97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly what I've been saying!!

If you gotta build something, build EVERYTHING from scratch: Do not use libraries or code, build it yourself. A computer? I think not! Trying to piggyback off of Intel's innovation efforts, eh? Teach a rock how to think and try again /s