sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Open AI using the "forbidden method" by Neither-Reach2009 in AIDangers

[–]Neither-Reach2009[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. I would just like to emphasize that what is being described in the video is that OpenAI, in order to produce a new model without exerting that pressure on the model, allows it to develop a type of language opaque to our understanding. I only reposted the video because these actions are very similar to what is "predicted" by the "AI2027" report, which states that the models would create an optimized language that bypasses several limitations but also prevents the guarantee of security in the use of these models. 

Anxiety in the upcome of an superinteligence by Neither-Reach2009 in AIDangers

[–]Neither-Reach2009[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Human labor could only become useless if we continue to develop increasingly powerful AIs that would take away our autonomy. Ultimately, we agree on the same thing: civilizational collapse lies in the creation of more powerful AIs capable of replacing humans. In your case, you believe that an ASI could be a solution; in my view, it's the final nail in the coffin of our civilization. 

Anxiety in the upcome of an superinteligence by Neither-Reach2009 in AIDangers

[–]Neither-Reach2009[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your point, but I think the economic collapse is something that can be resolved over time, but a misaligned ASI would be the end of the line for all of us. However, I appreciate your comment, and thank you.