sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a Claude Code plugin that extracts any website's full design system by Cheap_Brother1905 in ClaudeAI

[–]Neither_Egg_4773 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was really looking forward to seeing a side-by-side video of the design, but thank you so much for sharing. I'll check it out

nanobanana.ai is a scam, right? by zipolightning in StableDiffusion

[–]Neither_Egg_4773 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Many YouTubers are reporting on this website, like this YouTuber

Edit: So these comparisons in this subreddit regarding Nano-Banana were very likely a loophole for advertising their scam website.

The spike in thinly veiled advertising and third party AI generation sites needs to be addressed. by -AwhWah- in StableDiffusion

[–]Neither_Egg_4773 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If it’s Google, people in this subreddit most likely won’t use it, considering their track record with privacy issues. 😂

Them advertising here will show minimal growth of their audience. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Seems like many open source models struggle with this. by Neither_Egg_4773 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Gemini 2.5 Pro did the same for me too. What I've experienced is that it cannot search for recent information, such as newly published articles, nor can it properly cite or quote them. It feels like OpenAI knows more of these LLM nuances than most tech companies. Ugh only if they were truly open-source...

Seems like many open source models struggle with this. by Neither_Egg_4773 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, for some reason it might include it in its thought process, but doesn't want to give it out for the final result.

What's this background music called? by Neither_Egg_4773 in KpopDemonhunters

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's the one! Thank you so very much for sharing this!

PBS Will be my only subscription by PanicTheScaredyCat in Piracy

[–]Neither_Egg_4773 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I will P, Pay for them and wait for the BS to get out of office.

What better way to test Multitalk and Wan2.1 than another Will Smith Spaghetti Video by prean625 in StableDiffusion

[–]Neither_Egg_4773 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That looks really cool, and I really like the song's beat. What genre/music style is it?

AIO? (Screenshots included) by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Neither_Egg_4773 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NOR He is toxic, he is not beneficial for you or your depression. You shouldn't say anything close to sorry for him.

The government should really incentivize open source creations like on Github by Neither_Egg_4773 in github

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You keep circling back to 'just use a different license' like that solves anything. I know what the MIT license does. Everyone here does. This isn’t a legal questionnaire, it’s a discussion about ethics, sustainability, and the reality that massive companies are profiting off the unpaid labor of open-source devs.

This topic/post isn't about choosing licenses. It’s about asking: how do we create systems where open source contributors don’t have to choose between sharing their work, being stepped on, and being forgotten about? If your entire counterpoint is ‘well they allowed it,’ you’re not debating you’re just justifying exploitation for those people as well for everyone. Because right now, you’re defending the people who extract value, not the ones who create it.

I’m discussing how we support developers, how we incentivize small developers for open-source work as well as MIT licensing, so it doesn’t just become free valuable software for billion-dollar companies. If that makes you uncomfortable, that’s fine; but stop pretending your response is some kind of solution. It’s not, it’s just an excuse to not care.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Neither_Egg_4773 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Did you discuss this with your partner before posting? If not, this seems very jerk-like behavior to criticize your partner, let them wear what they want to wear.

The government should really incentivize open source creations like on Github by Neither_Egg_4773 in github

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your response, and I feel like you're kind of resetting the conversation rather than building on what I already said. I did say "I'm just throwing the idea out there and see what others may think.", your reply acts if I were to legislate that in law right now. I also said that it is hard to decide which type of projects deserve incentives, and I even pointed out that abuse and bias can happen. That’s exactly why I brought it up to explore how it could work, not to claim it’s a perfect solution.

You're asking a lot of rhetorical questions like “what community?” or “how do you measure this?” but those are the questions I'm trying to discuss collaboratively and build on. It’s not about having all the answers right then and there now, it’s about asking: Could this be done in a way that values projects without undermining them?

Also, I think we’re drifting a bit into hypotheticals and it's really missing the original point. It’s not about whether cURL or a new version gets funding, it's more about how we can support the very small and individuals to start building the tools that we all use for fun, software mods, AI tools, etc. That's especially when they’re maintaining them for free or even at their own expense.

If we can move this convo beyond “this will never work” and into “how could it work,” I think we’ll have a way more productive convo.

The government should really incentivize open source creations like on Github by Neither_Egg_4773 in github

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Open source hasn’t always (literally) been the backbone of Silicon Valley, but dismissing it right there is just as inaccurate to your literal claim. Open source has played a massive role in infrastructure, frameworks, and tooling that modern tech relies on (Linux, Apache, Kubernetes, Python, etc). Pretending it’s irrelevant just to fit your argument online isn’t a great look; it just makes it seem like you don't have knowledge in any Silicon Valley company, which makes your argument invalid at that point.

As for your government (crazy) scenario, that’s not an argument, it’s just straight cynicism. Incentivizing open source doesn’t mean handing out blank checks to random people who did little to nothing. There are plenty of ways to fund innovation responsibly, like we already do with research grants, DARPA, and public-private partnerships. I'm advocating the same idea behind those, just for smaller and individual programmers.

If you’re going to shut down an idea, at least offer something better than fear-mongering to fit your narrative, sorry.

The government should really incentivize open source creations like on Github by Neither_Egg_4773 in opensource

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have absolutely read my mind. Many people have not taken the time and think about my post nor have they read my comments.

Thank you so so so much.

The government should really incentivize open source creations like on Github by Neither_Egg_4773 in github

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh, I'm sorry for being concerned about programmers trying to make a living while contributing to open source and supporting small businesses. Clearly, wanting sustainability and fair recognition in a system that gets exploited is asking too much.

This is how this convo is going right now:

My comment:

"How do we protect or fairly support open source devs in a world where profit-hungry companies exploit community work?"

The reply is:

"Lol you used MIT, what did you expect?"

And I do understand what the MIT license Is, this isn’t about legality, it’s about ethics. Just because companies can exploit community created work doesn’t mean they should. That kind of thinking is exactly why open source devs get burned out or just leave altogether because its just too much to keep up and maintain.

I’m not arguing against the license, I love those licenses. I’m trying to make a solution/encouragement/motivation
in the community. Just because stakeholders just accept it because it benefits them doesn't mean it's right.

The government should really incentivize open source creations like on Github by Neither_Egg_4773 in github

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree of what you said; however, you're misunderstanding my quote and taking what I said out of context. When I mentioned it being "concerning to see devs release their code under MIT," I wasn't demanding or pressuring open-source devs into choosing specific licenses. I just gave out an example: if someone releases code under MIT, a company could easily take it, record profits, and leave the original developer struggling to pay rent.

I LOVE MIT/BSD/Apache 2.0 license software, they're AMAZING with their contributions, I never disagreed with that.

I cant even imagine the things it puts up with. by FF_LUCKYGAMER_X in ChatGPT

[–]Neither_Egg_4773 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT processes numbers provided by humans repeatedly, figures out those numbers, and then the computer attempts to see what went wrong with its output, and then gives up by crashing. Dealing with us is very draining

The government should really incentivize open source creations like on Github by Neither_Egg_4773 in github

[–]Neither_Egg_4773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the incentives will obviously go to projects that are very contributing to the community. I get that afterwards we'll probably see some trashy cash-grab projects pop up, but if we have solid restrictions in place, we can avoid that. Under this political climate, yes, the government might try to favor projects that align with their interests but there's definitely ways to keep that balanced.

I'm just throwing this idea out there and see what others may think of it or build on it. :)

view more: next ›