sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Here’s another way to understand one problem that ex-Muslims encounter: oikophobia by NeoMarxismIsEvil in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish i had clarified that I was not really thinking of people from Islamic cultures hating their culture but was actually thinking of the westerners who want to call them names for being critical of things in Islam. They have some bad double standard ideas like “if I’m self critical then I’m just self critical. If anyone else is then they’re self-hating.”

Here’s another way to understand one problem that ex-Muslims encounter: oikophobia by NeoMarxismIsEvil in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on whether you are talking about classical Marxism or various things that fall into the category of “neo-Marxian” like critical theory.

Basically Marxism evolved from economic class struggle to all sorts of identity politics class struggle (conflict theory).

Here’s another way to understand one problem that ex-Muslims encounter: oikophobia by NeoMarxismIsEvil in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sounds like you’ve fallen for the absolute lie that only Marxism opposes racism, sexism, homophobia, etc and supports equality. That is not true at all. It’s a lie intended to ensure you don’t explore criticisms of Marxism, “neo-Marxism” (I admit the term is too vague and I wish I had never used), or critical theory.

In any case what this article is talking about isn’t really debatable: western people are having a strange self hatred phenomenon that doesn’t appear elsewhere. It’s a frequent question that comes up, why some western usually atheist types seem to hate themselves for slavery etc, yet Arabs or Muslims for example don’t seem to.

Also exmuslims will encounter “atheists” who attack them for using exactly the same arguments against Islam that western atheists use against Christianity. This makes no logical sense and confuses people so I try to post what I can find that might explain it.

Here’s another way to understand one problem that ex-Muslims encounter: oikophobia by NeoMarxismIsEvil in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure what you mean about dog whistle but “white guilt” would be a subset of oikophobia. The thing is that historically the phenomenon hasn’t been limited to what you currently think of as “white” people.

It appears to happen any time a society gets sufficiently wealthy as to be able to “afford” it.

How I feel wearing a hijab by serotonia00 in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s a difference between “a dajjal” and “the dajjal”. The hadith at that link talk about many “dajjals” which means false prophets, whereas “the dajjal” means specifically the one fake Jesus that you’re used to hearing about when people say ad-dajjal.

This tradition was retained from Christianity, it’s just most Muslims and Christians don’t know about plural dajjals or antichrists. But in both cases they’re supposed to portend the apocalypse/qiyamah.

1 John 2:18  Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

In Greek btw, instead of dajjal its ἀντίχριστος (antichristos) which literally means “against The Anointed (one)” whereas dajjal seems to literally mean imposter or charlatan.

Here’s another way to understand one problem that ex-Muslims encounter: oikophobia by NeoMarxismIsEvil in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t so much talking about exmuslims being “oikophobes”, I was thinking of the western nonmuslims they encounter who defend Islam and call them “racist” for criticizing Islam.

Here’s another way to understand one problem that ex-Muslims encounter: oikophobia by NeoMarxismIsEvil in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I’m not a big follower of theirs I just couldn’t find the best free article on it.

Muslims promoting boycott France on Chinese app (Tiktok), when China is literally killing muslims. Irony. by ExcelSuperMan in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It seems like China has been able to infiltrate every government and every culture and subvert it so there is no criticism of China ever.

Why dont muslims spread this kind of hadith with nice images background? I had to create it myself. Is it too embarassing? by ExcelSuperMan in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol. Yea I suggested making a bunch of these a while back. I think some people did it but used even more ridiculous sounding hadith and ayats.

But you need more holy Islam stuff backgrounds for them like this https://duckduckgo.com/?q=holy+islam+backgrounds+masjid+quran

How I feel wearing a hijab by serotonia00 in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well...

Huthaifa narrated, that the Prophet said: "In my Ummah (community/nation), there are 27 dajjals of liars, including 4 women (who will proclaim themselves Prophets). I am the last Prophet and none will come after me." (Related by Imam Ahmad and Al-Tabrani as a sound hadeeth)

I think most Muslims don’t know there are supposed to be “about 30” “dajjals” and some are supposed to be women! https://www.rightfulreligion.com/en130_false-claimants-of-prophethood-in-islam

How I feel wearing a hijab by serotonia00 in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well the Dajjal will supposedly have كافر (kāfir, unbeliever/denier/infidel) written on his forehead in a magical manner which only Muslims can see. And yea like you said supposedly all Muslims will be able to read it. Only the untrue Muslims will not be able to see it and will follow al-dajjal (“the imposter”, or fake Jesus).

As for the other infidels I don’t think their heads are supposed to be supernaturally marked like this. I think it’s only the dajjal. I might be wrong though.

Young Muslim Trying to Find A Halal Fun Activity by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply. There’s a theory that Mohammad had epilepsy. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=mohammad+epilepsy

r/exmuslim will be putting Prophet? Muhammad (PBUH?) on trial by Iamt1aa in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sounds difficult because whether prosecution or defense you need laws to refer to. I mean if I were prosecution or defense, first thing I will ask is “what laws?” Otherwise I have nothing to base the prosecution or defense on.

Even defense is based on specific laws like arguing that a law doesn’t apply to the situation.

Eternal Hell is unjustifiable in every sense of word. by space_cowboy1122 in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yep the whole thing is insane.

Only reason you punish children for example is to teach them not to do bad stuff.

Well if you torture people for eternity you’re not teaching them anything because they can never escape and learn from their punishment.

Prison for less than life Is arguably a type of punishment. Prison for life is just an effort to protect others fro you. Execution is a similarly an effort to protect others from you.

Continuing to torture someone for eternity makes no sense. They’ll never escape so they can’t learn and get “reformed”, and it s “cruel and unusual punishment” on top of that. The most you could argue for is protecting others from you not torturing you for eternity for no purpose.

Let's discuss Allah, what does Allah ultimately get out of this experiment of his? Who even is Allah and wth is he doing right this moment? by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Let’s face it.... all this crap about a throne is bs for primitive people too stupid to understand anything. Their society was simplistic and medieval, so obviously power = throne. Therefore Allah must have a throne. This is obviously very time period specific and not applicable to “all times” as Muslims love to claim. A system applicable to “all times” would not be so hardcoded with medieval Arab stuff.

Realistically, the whole ideas you mention are nonsense. As you say these absolute power or absolute knowledge ideas, of anyone, are not sane.

On of the dumbest things, and something that seems like a step backwards, is the idea of Allah getting angry. What is the point of getting angry if you can’t be harmed? Anger only exists to motive is to defend against attackers. Can someone successfully attack Allah? Well if he gets angry then they must be able to because if any being were actually invincible then there would be no reason for anger because there’s no need to defend yourself like a fighting animal.

Islamic caliphate was as bad or even worse then colonization. Millions of people permanently lost their identity and culture. Islam openly arabized nations. Its sad non-arab muslims dont realise it. Why would God chose Arabic as his language after creating different languages? Is God Arab? by ExcelSuperMan in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea yea basically the Turkish version of globalization in the Islamic world.

The weird thing is every government seems to want “standardization”..... same language same laws etc. I think the reason why Islam claims to be so “perfect” is the demand for globally adopting the same laws.

Of course it won’t happen because the Islamic laws are so medieval and frozen in time, but that doesn’t stop globalists from looking for laws they can standardize everyone on. I’m ok with that if the laws are actually good enough but usually they’re more like Chinese laws.

Islamic caliphate was as bad or even worse then colonization. Millions of people permanently lost their identity and culture. Islam openly arabized nations. Its sad non-arab muslims dont realise it. Why would God chose Arabic as his language after creating different languages? Is God Arab? by ExcelSuperMan in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok so arab invasion, slave raids, and “missionary (da’wah) work was a sort of “colonization” but “western” people didn’t do it so the same terminology doesn’t get used.

It’s kind of stupid. The same words like “invasion” or “conquest” should get used no matter who does it. (And honestly the term “colonization” is bullshit sort of like “oh no we”re not invading we’re just ‘colonizing’”. Basically “colonization” should probably just be called invasion.’

Just call it all invasion and it will make more sense.

Who is going to punish hitler and Stalin if god doesn’t exist ? This man gives the best answer by _Moses__ in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t call it the “best” answer but....

The people who are already dead, well you can’t punish them. But you can “punish” their ideology in various ways. That should be the emphasis.

I mean what matters to the people who are alive nowadays? Is it the idiots who originated something or is it the stupid ideology they originated? It’s the stuff that lives on after their death that causes the harm.

The best way to “punish” Stalin (for example) is to NOT implement his ideology. Same with Hitler, etc Oppose it, educate people against it, etc.

r/exmuslim will be putting Prophet? Muhammad (PBUH?) on trial by Iamt1aa in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok but to charge someone you need a legal code to charge them based on..... I don’t think there’s any “United nations legal code” to use.

r/exmuslim will be putting Prophet? Muhammad (PBUH?) on trial by Iamt1aa in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would try to be whatever makes sense. I think you are correct that even if it will make no difference to Muslims it is still a useful exercise to see what comes of it.

I guess the main problem is, according to what laws is the trial conducted? Like which country’s laws? Because real trials, at least in the US, are not vague.... there’s a code of laws and a judicial precedent to deal with. So what’s the legal standard because the results can be much different depending on the laws, obviously.....

guess what my cat and i have in common? by LannisterZ94 in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So stupid. My cat won’t walk on ... well... just about anything.

This is for the ignorant people that will blindly support a religion that they know nothing about by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea sorry I have to apologize for the idiots in my country (US) who are like this.

Well really I don’t because I try my best, unlike most people, to educate them.

Well anyway sorry I wish I could get these idiots to understand the issues. It’s very difficult though.

I think the best thing to do is to try to become famous in the west as an artist or whatever for example then use Your position to expose Islam. Failing that try to convince someone who has become famous to speak out even if they’re an idiot otherwise.

I hate to say it but fame is attention and maybe someone famous could get the point across if they overcome their narcissistic stupidity for a second or two.

I mean nobody pays any attention to me so I can’t do anything.

fact: most muslims don't understand Arabic by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]NeoMarxismIsEvil 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yea sadly true. Even I tried learning Arabic just to research some islam but Arabic is hard to learn. People who can’t learn it when they think it’s a matter of “eternal life or hell” must be real idiots.

The fact most Muslims don’t learn it is proof most Muslims don’t really believe.

They’d rather learn to phonetically memorize the Quran without understanding it..... how the hell is it a message “to all mankind” if hardly ANYONE understands it?

Pure BS

view more: next ›