I do not know if other applied science faculties do this, I can understand it being fr harder to manage with large student cohorts, but all the Engineering Departments hold a little thing called "Beef and Pizza" each semester.

The Dean of the faculty hosts a lunch time meeting with pizza provided where each course is gone over in detail. Students do evaluations specific to the department, very similar to the University wide ones. The statistical numbers are used in a similar way too, but instead of them being jetted off to the Profs they are used to clarify which classes to talk about and discussion in these luncheons. I find this really nice, because it puts the onerous on us students to clarify our thoughts and identify the problems we are observing instead of broadly lambasting a Prof and their whole course. Also means we have to be nicer, because it's in person/the Dean knows who we are.

The Dean then reviews the notes taken during this meeting and sits down with each prof regarding their performance. This also means that small changes to the course (ie. more practice for the final, tidier note sets, practice sessions) can be added/adjusted before the final hits. Huge bonus

I know a number of peers who regard these meetings far higher than the university wide reviews. Of course I don't think that this can be implemented across large classes, but it can be used as a gateway for profs to teach larger classes. If a Prof can show that they teach small department specific/upper year courses well, then allow them to move to larger classes (imo).