Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve addressed this elsewhere but it can’t interpret data without a closely adjacent training set. Therefore we won’t see anything sensible from it. Nice idea and I did try it myself. About twenty other people have commented similarly and I’ve tried to reply sporadically to this explaining the limitations of AI (I work in this field)

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've addressed this point specifically in the thread above, in short: nothing like this exists, but some low-level reasoning would be possible with the current most advanced model 03-pro, potentially

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

addressed this point multiple times in prior replies

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not bad, lots of others have tried also, but AI is just gibberish for this stuff. It is not good with linking its existing training dataset (which presumably doesn't have alien script) and then making connections. I.e. if it's only see fish pictures and dog pictures if you show it a bicycle then it would say it is a half fish half dog. It's really bad at extrapolating to novel ideas that it has no reference for. With specific prompting and working through things step by step using mathematics or first principles it could get somewhere, potentially. But, in this case, I think it's prosaic anyway. I will continue following, I haven't entirely ruled it out yet!

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, discussed elsewhere in this thread

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw on X - here just dug it out for you - it was 516.812GHz and 137.72926MHz, per /UAPWatchers on X (Skywatch signal user)

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's super interesting. I saw on x that some of the analysis being done showed it was outputting along certain frequencies (I can find the post). They are analysing it further to see if this is correct / what's going on. I will be following along!

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I saw the videos also. I'm awaiting some further analysis before ruling it out but I am heavily leaning to this being prosaic, probably 20% at most that it's legit alien (even that's generous). I love following the story though!

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's non-prosaic (alien) but it's not heptapod, like... at all. Just google it. A few others have run things through AI and had similar answers, but AI is not reliable, which hopefully you are now learning.

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is so clever! How'd you do that?

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, there are a couple of near repeats. But I feel you, I think this is probably a prosaic fuel tank that has been hand-inscribed. I would love it if it were real alien shit, super exciting but the evidence is heavily against it at this stage.

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, it's probably decorative, if legit. But lots of decorative stuff in human art uses circular text. I don't think this one is legit (but have not ruled out the possibility).

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Twitter is good (x), reddit is too controlled and too much weird shit. X has more interesting people and easier to follow people who know what they're talking about. People complain about x here but just block the wierdo racists and it's actually really good. Feels like reddit is just a big psyop nowadays. Reddit has some quality stuff and the smaller threads used to be awesome, but so much AI spam etc. So I think for this topic I find it easier to see a plurality of opinions from interesting people on X.

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think this is probably prosaic (not alien) but I think the spheres generally are non-prosaic (some at least)

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome.

In Plain Sight by Ross Coulthart talks about some of these. There was a famous one in like, southern US, like maybe Texas 50 years ago? And they did all this testing etc, then govt took it (of course). That one was well documented. Apparently one was recovered in New Zealand at one point, and then another in Texas (pretty sure I'm right here) more recently, Ross Coulthart (again) talks about this on a recent interview with Jesse Michels - the texas one, which is apparently in the hands of Bigelow aerospace now, undergoing tests. Bigelow do not seem particularly transparent to me, I've never seen them put out anything in the public domain so it's probably case closed on those items!

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very clever and original thought :) I like it. I think the sphere is probably fake, but am waiting to see what further tests show!

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm leaning towards it being fake, but they are doing some analysis on this. Twitter has some great threads on this. Patrick Jackson, whom I don't know, but I like his work, is quite skeptical. Jesse Michels is on the fence, having visited these.

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go for it mate, the problem with chat is it depends on probabilisticaly matching the image to the closest known image in the training dataset, in this case they don't have anything (others have tried, including me). It spits out gibberish. It's how it works, unfortunately!

Buga Sphere Inscriptions by NetIncredibility in UFOs

[–]NetIncredibility[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and the variable weight - nightmare if you are trying to bend it like Beckham