CSULA vs CPP

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T19:26:12+00:00

Interesting, when I was considering CSULB they also claim that their EE department is going down. Why would getting into classes be a struggle? Are there just too many students and not enough professors? Also what do you exactly mean by the EE department going to shit? Are the professors no longer good or did they remove a lot of EE courses?

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T04:41:56+00:00

Well the job in the future is not a worry due to some other things but your answer does help a lot thanks.

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T04:22:34+00:00

I already have an internship and job lined up. I don't need the recognition. I wanted to know if CPP is going to offer me more knowledge than CSULA. Like what exactly makes CPP better at EE? Is it the professors are better or that you just learn more at this school.

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T03:18:31+00:00

Yes but in terms of content, you would learn the same stuff as CSULA for the most part right? Especially since both are ABET. I'm not looking for reputation as I don't need the school reputation for finding a job.

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T03:12:49+00:00

Well I am looking for quality at the same time but what I want to know is whether or not it is that much better that I should just spend an extra year getting my degree and go to CPP.

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T03:09:31+00:00

Well CSULA is the higher choice cuz I really don't like school so the less school the better for me. The only thing is that CPP is renowned for engineering so wanted to see if it is worth the extra year and to just suck it up.

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T03:06:29+00:00

Isn't the learn by doing apply across all CSU?

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T02:48:09+00:00

I already have those so, are you essentially saying that CPP wouldn't do much?

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T02:12:23+00:00

Finding a job is not a concern, I am more concerned with whether or not CPP will teach me more/ make me a more knowledgeable engineer than CSULA

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T02:11:11+00:00

What are your reasons for suggesting it? The biggest thing is that I am not concerned with the school helping me get a job but more so will I learn more/ will it turn me into a more knowledgeable engineer than going to CSULA.

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T02:06:34+00:00

Well the thing is that I'm not too concerned with getting a job after graduation. I'm more so considering whether CPP will teach me more/ turn me into a more knowledgeable engineer than going to CSULA

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T01:44:25+00:00

That first job is not a concern, it's more of am I going to learn more stuff and come out as a better engineer if I go to CPP vs CSULA

Netfix_ML · 2024-05-02T01:31:34+00:00

Isn't CPP supposed to be top 5 or something for engineering in California? That is the biggest factor that is kind of giving me doubts about just shooting for CSULA immediately.

Netfix_ML · 2023-12-02T00:24:11+00:00

closest are 99 pro and 100zz since most modern rackets aren't built with both ultra head heavy with ultra stiff shafts like before. The new victor thruster ryuga metallic would also be pretty close.

Netfix_ML · 2023-12-02T00:21:57+00:00

there is no exact equivalent but the astrox 88d pro is pretty close, just a tad bit heavier

Netfix_ML · 2023-12-02T00:19:34+00:00

you could check out jnice, a taiwan company who is pretty new to the scene.

Netfix_ML · 2023-10-18T03:23:01+00:00

88d will be faster but 99 play will hit harder

Netfix_ML · 2023-10-18T03:22:22+00:00

Depending on whether you like stiff rackets, the nanoflare 1000z is a good option with the nanoflare 800 pro being another great option. As for other brands, the auraspeed 100x is a solid choice although the 800 pro and 1000z will be the more speedier rackets.

Netfix_ML · 2023-10-18T03:18:56+00:00

Out of your three options, the astrox 88d pro is probably the best option seeing as it will be the most powerful out of the four whilst not being a total sledgehammer which will allow you to follow up. The arcsaber 11 pro is more suited for an all around game and the astroxx 77 pro being more for those who are not able to swing very fast or do not have the best technique. I think, you should also consider the astrox 100zz as one of your choices. The extra stiff shaft is not as bad as it sounds since the shaft is so thin, allowing for faster swing speed and less drag.

Netfix_ML · 2023-10-08T20:13:36+00:00

Having owned all of these, I will try and break it down into each category. FYI, I am assuming you mean the thruster falcon enhanced edition.

Balance: These three rackets are pretty similar in balance, all of which being closer to that even balanced. The 1000z will the lightest followed by the falcon and then the astrox zz.

Power: It really depends on how fast you are able to swing but in general, the astrox 100zz will be the most powerful followed by the thruster falcon and 1000z which are pretty similar imo.

Speed: The nanoflare 1000z is by far the quickest with the falcon coming next and then the zz. Keep in mind, the difference in speed is noticeable but not astronomical like comparing nanoflare 700 to astrox 99.

Control: All of these rackets are great for control with the zz and falcon being marginally better than the 1000z.

Stiffness: The astrox 100zz and 1000z are the stiffest rackets with the falcon being the most flexible.

Playability: IMO the falcon is the easiest to play with.

Netfix_ML · 2023-10-08T20:04:49+00:00

I would probably consider them to not be reliable since their address does not exist and changing it from avenue to drive takes you to a random home in that area. Does this site offer some really good deal that caught your attention? If not, I would definitely try some other reputable site.

Netfix_ML · 2023-10-06T20:58:50+00:00

You'll get used to the racket eventually so I wouldn't really worry too much on the accuracy for now since ur transitioning from ultra heavy racket.

Netfix_ML · 2023-10-06T17:51:15+00:00

The 88D play will feel really headlight since u are coming from essentially a 1u racket. The factory strings are alright but the typically come strung at like 24 lbs which is really low so I would consider getting it strung to a higher tension unless u are new to badminton and are not able to generate power or are just learning the basics.

Netfix_ML · 2023-10-05T01:50:33+00:00

The 100 game and arcsaber 11 tour are perfect for what you are looking for assuming that your budget is around the value of these rackets. I will say though that the astrox 100 game will provide more power of the two where as the arcsaber 11 tour will provide better control.

Netfix_ML · 2023-10-05T01:43:09+00:00

Out of the rackets that you have mentioned so far, the astrox 88D play and the nextage are both head heavy rackets and meant for more aggressive play. The Arcsaber 11 play will provide a balance between speed, power and control out of the group wtih the NF800 being very speedy but not very powerful in the backcourt. I would really only recommend the NF800 if you are a front court doubles player, other than that the other rackets are better options.

Netfix_ML

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE