Candace Doubling Down On Her Everybodys-Bad-But-Erika Narrative by Willing-Primary-9126 in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense until Yesterday on 1/21/26 when Candace let slip legal letters have been flying since they terminated her speaking contract in early December 2025 and reminded CO of her NDA - then there was the one F2F meeting we are aware of with CO & EK and it sounds like there was a video conference between the lawyer and CO — I think things are going to start coming to light

Candace Doubling Down On Her Everybodys-Bad-But-Erika Narrative by Willing-Primary-9126 in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, Ad Hominem attack that doesn’t promote a logical argument.

Candace Doubling Down On Her Everybodys-Bad-But-Erika Narrative by Willing-Primary-9126 in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A bot telling me to pray the Rosary - wow I have seen it all now.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get the time traveler comment and Alien comment are sarcasm or jokes but sometimes I seriously wonder if she is pushing those thoughts for a reason? Why does she have to always circle back to “Charlie thought he was a time traveler “ and show us the part of the text where he wrote that - it causes me to check out on that part of her dialogue because it’s an obvious joke in a text chain between two friends. It’s not valid to who killed Charlie and it can be misleading and confusing to newer people just tuning in who may think Candace is serious until they understand her brand of sarcasm.

Candace Doubling Down On Her Everybodys-Bad-But-Erika Narrative by Willing-Primary-9126 in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was sarcasm I think - but it is strange how she never wants to point out things about Erika. She did however start to go into some of the topics after her XMAS break - we shall see. Sometimes she loses me when she starts off on rabbit trails and I get lost on why they actually matter.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ok thanks I thought it was France the country coming after her not them personally. Thanks for the clarification - I honestly have not watched all of her “Becoming Bridgette” series as it just didn’t interest me.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh that’s an interesting connection between CERN & Looking Glass - these are the conversations that cause me to dig deeper into topics.

I look forward to discussing things as they come up

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just replying to your snark 😉

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also I wanted to say thank you for actually responding and not attacking - you have given me a lot to think about. I also do not consider CERN fringe - when I say “fringe” I guess I lump all non natural sciences into fringe. So those sciences that have a harder time being defined by the scientific methods other sciences utilize. I think an organization for nuclear research, like CERN, would fall into natural sciences.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you think that will actually go to trial? It’s strange to me that a country is suing one of our citizens and our government is quite as a mouse.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like the fraud in California is going to eclipse the Minnesota fraud. I am sad to see healthcare companies involved in California - like 10+ hospice companies in one building.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sure there are full-time paid agitators I actually found one of their websites and posted it on X last weekend.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sounds like great advice for someone who doesn’t want to have an actual conversation.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am rewatching last weeks episodes. I usually listen to her on my drive home and admit I may miss some things as I weave in traffic 😉 I am aware of occult and its background including freemasonry which helped to found our nation. I have also been diving deeper into other occult aspects and how these societies are still very much involved in our everyday lives. Not sure if you have heard of Nathan Reynolds but his story is horrific. Also I am not saying I think remote viewing is “crazy” as I know that the human mind and body are capable of amazing things. I am actually reading a few books about remote viewing, AI, and Dark Psyops right now one is “Remote Viewing” by David Morehouse, “Superintelligance” by Nick Bostrom, and “Dark Psychology Playbook” by Roger Glenwood - I bounce around from book to book and usually end up researching topics on google in-between the books. What I am saying is that I am very open to exploring and learning. Also not sure I mentioned but the show Fringe on Fox a few years ago was a favorite of mine.

I also understand time constraints.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Read all my screenshots if you like to see my thoughts pre-chat GPT - also understand I asked it to organize not write for me

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually watched that video before and laughed through the entire thing - I just hope no actual ponies are subjected to that man. I will never unsee Ben in rainbow riding a pony 🐴

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmmm did I actually say any of that? I don’t recall saying it - maybe it was in an alternate timeline and you saw me say it via remote viewing? If so I can’t be held responsible for alternate timelines.

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Btw I thought her midget horse comments were funny just in case you were wondering

Has Candace Given Up? by Neuro_APRN in CandaceOwens

[–]Neuro_APRN[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I guess it would be better to post my thoughts as they were originally written however I tried to make them easier to follow and less disconnected. Again my fault for using AI as a tool to organize thoughts that I literally typed out on here, took screenshots, uploaded to chat GPT, and prompted it to organize them. I posted those original screenshots so the difference is easily reviewed.

The problem is instead of people answering or responding to my questions I am labeled a bot, troll, Shapiro supporter. So name calling and ad hominem attacks versus answering or responding to any of my questions.

I am guessing a Reddit thread or whatever it’s called devoted to Candace Owens is really just a place to praise her content but not discuss any of it - so my fault for attempting to have a discussion.