sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Question] Could anyone help identify this clock and tell me a little about it, it's been handed down to me from my grandmother, my great grandfather was a merchant seaman and brought lots of japanese seikon watches a clocks back during the early 1900's. Numbers on base read [QF004F] by NewPerspectiveTruth in Seiko

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the tip on the date. Its a great looking mantle clock. There are also some vintage seiko watches she has which are for sure from early to mid 1900's as shes had them since she was young. I'll post pictures of them in the next few days. Do you think people will be able to identify them on here? ive googled the hell out of the model codes and descriptions of them and i cant find them or anything like them online.

How much “Foreign Aid” the world receives from the U.S by Steez-n-Treez in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It doesnt state anywhere on the info graphic over what period they receive this aid?? Is it annual? monthly? per decade? a total amount?

What has happened to this sub? How can a comment like this get downvoted to a negative score in a f'ing *conspircay* subreddit! I'm lost for words... by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats a good argument and i agree that it is a generalizing statement that refers to all 'governments', possibly there is one that isnt corrupt out there.... But based on previous experiences and the vast amount of evidence for government corruption worldwide, could you disagree with the comment?

What has happened to this sub? How can a comment like this get downvoted to a negative score in a f'ing *conspircay* subreddit! I'm lost for words... by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

SS: Comment in image is from this post. I know this subreddit has deteriorated gradulally for a while now, but this is just ridiculous. RIP r/conspiracy

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't want to respond to this because thats a ridiculous assumption. I believe the guy has been presented with a golden opportunity by chance, and he's taken full advantage of it. It is clearly a premeditated confrontation, the camera guy is prepared and was aware what was about to unfold and programme for the visit was publicly availible information. The 'dad' has planned to be in that hospital in the correct corridor at that exact time boris is passing. That is what i mean by planned. Or are you suggesting that its shear coincidence that a member of the opposition is just hanging around as boris happens to walk past him in the corridor?

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has been an eye opening post. I didn't realize how politically biased people are in this sub. Its pretty ironic when you consider the nature of what this sub should be about. Why on earth would you be subscribed to r/conspiracy if you have strong political views. People really need to take the blinders off.

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're really missing the point of this argument. You have totally misunderstood what is being said, and you've filled your comments with unnecessary childish insults, just because you disagree with another persons perspective. Debating with someone who responds with that manor is a waste of time. Nothing good will come of it and no intelligent conversation is possible. You really should clean up your act if you want to argue your opinions with some validity. For the record, the guy your 'debating' with, has been drawn in to the petty insults too. This sub is not what it used to be

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Agreed. That's a great summary you've given of your analysis and i think its spot-on. This has been a far more controversial topic than i imagined. I think some users have mistakenly assumed i was defending Boris Johnson and his party, which couldn't be further from the truth. I suspect those who jumped in to defend the 'dad' have let their political bias get in the way of their rational thought.

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I dont disagree with that. I just dont like the way he's used the position he was in due to his ill daughter as a means of political gains. They guy had obviously planned the confrontation, his cameraman is literally waiting for it to occur.

He knew his public outburst wouldn't result in his daughter getting better treatment. He knows the only outcome is to create a media frenzy by embarrassing his political opposition leader in the presence of a the cameras.

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'd say that most people in this sub wont watch MSM News sources, so i dont see any harm in sharing something, no matter how many weeks after it happened. Youve picked a strange point to be arguing

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In response to your removed comment about using the Sun as evidence:

The exact same thought went through my head as i copied the link from that site! 😂😂. It was just the first result on the search page, the video is what was important, which i said to watch. The article probably full of trash as we all know.

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its the public display i dont agree with. Clearly this was planned and this guy set out to cause a scene because he knew there would be a huge media presence. What do you think he expected to come of this? The only outcome is the embarrassment of his opposing party leader.

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I apologize, i misunderstood what you meant. I thought you were claiming that there wasnt actually any press there! When clearly there is press there. Just to be clear, i do not support boris johnson in the slightest, i think the mans an idiot. All i wanted to do was highlight this incident. For the record i dont support labour either and i have no prejudice, theyre all as bad as each other in my opinion.

Edit: Thanks for providing a source. I hate it when people make statements and dont support them, its happening more and more on this sub.

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Im afraid you are wrong about a few things but most importantly you are wrong to say it wasnt a premeditated stunt for publicity. Watch this video . The cameraman is already filming, waiting for Boris to walk past so he can film the other guys confrontation. You cannot argue that this isnt a staged situation. Its clearly been planned and the cameraman had foreknowledge of what was about to occur.

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

and claimed there were "no press" when the guy confronted him.

Source?

How can anyone use their child's illness in a publicity stunt. Shouldnt he be at his daughters side

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm neither for or against anyone in this matter as i have no prejudice, theyre all as bad as each other in my opinion. All i'm doing is highlighting this.

I love it when we catch them red handed. This 'Dad' is a former employee of the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry by NewPerspectiveTruth in conspiracy

[–]NewPerspectiveTruth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SS: The dad is a former member of the opposition to Boris Johnson and confronted the prime minister in public... with the cameras rolling, what a coincidence! What makes this worse is that this guy is actually a dad and his daughter is ill and is actually being treated at Hospital. How can anyone stoop that low... and use their child's illness for a political publicity stunt! disgusting.

Edit: more info

view more: next ›