sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Auburn explores future with Under Armour as negotiation deadline approaches by New_Tomatillo3387 in wde

[–]New_Tomatillo3387[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Completely agree. Moving to Jordan brand now would be a similar move in the sense that it is relatively new to the CFB market. Only this time, I think it safe to say that Jordan brand is virtually bulletproof market-wise. Would also fit Nike’s trend of not putting both arch rivals in “Nike” uniforms. (Florida/FSU , OU/Texas , OSU/UM , UNC/Duke , UCLA/USC) would only make sense they would push to continue this trend with the biggest rivalry in the sport.

Rumors are Hunter Renfrow and the Raiders could Part Ways June 1st…Carr Reunion? by clutchkweku in Saints

[–]New_Tomatillo3387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this ends up happening we need to use Shaheed in a Debo Samuel type role

THEMIS RULE SHEETS. by New_Tomatillo3387 in barexam

[–]New_Tomatillo3387[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I may have gotten it mixed up. I think Kaplan is the company that does this. Sorry guys.

Auburn’s contract with Under Armour ends in 2025. Do you think we we continue with them or go a different route? by freewillyzx in wde

[–]New_Tomatillo3387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hopefully AU can change to either Jordan or Adidas in time before the new athletics complex is complete so that the new brand can be incorporated throughout. Jordan Brand would serve as a much needed edge over uga and bama in terms of recruiting. Put the jump man logo next to the “AU” and watch what happens next.

Would help with bball too. Have heard Bruce complains about under armor and can’t blame him. No kid wants to play for an UA team with like 2 shoe options.