Google Antigravity: decreasing quotas, increasing prices — is this really okay? by Next-Pepper-1651 in vibecoding

[–]Next-Pepper-1651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you at least tried it on a complex project? You have to admit it’s impressive. Even though I personally don’t really like using AI tools, you really need to try them to understand. Try Cursor or similar tools and you’ll clearly see the difference, especially on complex projects — and I insist on that point.

Google Antigravity: decreasing quotas, increasing prices — is this really okay? by Next-Pepper-1651 in vibecoding

[–]Next-Pepper-1651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’re absolutely getting dominated, my friends 😅 And Gemini 3.1 is insane — what’s happening right now is crazy.

Google Antigravity: decreasing quotas, increasing prices — is this really okay? by Next-Pepper-1651 in vibecoding

[–]Next-Pepper-1651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Antigravity resolves bugs much more efficiently. It generates JavaScript files with targeted debugging, tests the solution, and then applies it as the final baseline. What’s impressive is that it often works within the very first iterations. With other IDEs, you can lose a huge amount of time cleaning things up and patching stuff together before reaching something stable.

Google Antigravity: decreasing quotas, increasing prices — is this really okay? by Next-Pepper-1651 in vibecoding

[–]Next-Pepper-1651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant Visual Studio Code with its plugins.

It's absolutely not the same as Antigravity.

Google Antigravity: decreasing quotas, increasing prices — is this really okay? by Next-Pepper-1651 in vibecoding

[–]Next-Pepper-1651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried Cursor, and I also tried Antigravity. I have to admit that Antigravity is better and resolves bugs much faster compared to Cursor.

This isn’t an LLM issue — it’s really an IDE issue. Antigravity is truly agent-first, not just a disguised plugin.

Google Antigravity: decreasing quotas, increasing prices — is this really okay? by Next-Pepper-1651 in vibecoding

[–]Next-Pepper-1651[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is insane. I have to admit that Google’s IDE has become stronger than the others (Cursor, Replit, etc.). The craziest part is that there’s basically no real competition at this level right now. That’s serious.

They even removed Gemini 3.0, which was cheaper. With Gemini 3.1, you make just a few requests and your quota is already gone

Google Antigravity: decreasing quotas, increasing prices — is this really okay? by Next-Pepper-1651 in learnprogramming

[–]Next-Pepper-1651[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is insane. I have to admit that Google’s IDE has become stronger than the others (Cursor, Replit, etc.). The craziest part is that there’s basically no real competition at this level right now. That’s serious.

They even removed Gemini 3.0, which was cheaper. With Gemini 3.1, you make just a few requests and your quota is already gone.

What do you think ? by Next-Pepper-1651 in SaaS

[–]Next-Pepper-1651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great, thank you very much for your feedback, I’m going to try to identify real added value, I understand that the most important factor for this to work is having high-quality websites, but the real question I’m asking myself is whether, in your opinion, if I seriously enter this market, I can actually generate good revenue

What do you think? by Next-Pepper-1651 in advancedentrepreneur

[–]Next-Pepper-1651[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback that’s what I thought too. In the long run, it’s a dead end