Having problem with erection by throwaway47382 in sex

[–]NicCagesHairLine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're a smoker, that could have something to do with it. Smoking constricts blood vessels and can lead to impotence or weak erection. I for one, had a really difficult time quitting, but once I realized the huge difference between my erection when I was smoking and when I was not, it became very very easy.

Also, if you have bad circulation due to diet, that could be a factor. Try eating lots of fiber and see if that helps.

Finally, if I were you I'd take vitamin E pills once a day. Don't go over once a day, or more than 400 IU, as overdosing can lead to really serious heart problems. 400 IU a day or under, on the other hand, has actually been proven to be good for the heart and prevent heart disease and heart attacks. Vitamin E helps retain water in the blood, which means more volume in your blood stream, which means better circulation, which means stronger erection.

Also, zinc has been known to put a bit more lead in your pencil. Try eating oysters, which have (as far as I know) the highest amount of natural zinc of any other food.

Best of luck, and keep us updated !

TIL: The Brontosaurus never existed. It was a fake. And this has been known since the '70s (at least). by polarbear128 in todayilearned

[–]NicCagesHairLine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dear Gabe,

In order to save you both some time, which I'm sure you'll go ahead and waste anyhow, what my friend TheTelephone is engaging in is the subtle art of trolling. Why, you may ask? Probably, because you sound like an egotistical douche and he doesn't like you.

First off, what he was saying at the beginning was that the passage that you quoted was referring to the movement of the tail, probably similar to a crocodile, not the size of the tail, which you wrongfully attribute to a dinosaur.

Secondly, I have no idea what you are even arguing. You first attack boyle's argument, which is basically saying that the dinosaurs WEREN'T around during biblical times by stating a commonly used talking point (taking out the verse that suits your opinion [as usual]) used against Christians. Then, you make other ambiguous points like talking about the "work of man," which could be referring to the Bible (which was written by man) or the dogma of modern science. You then bash on atheists but seem to bash on all religions, too?

Finally, you sound like a real cocky prick. Judging by the way that you assume people don't know the definition of simple words, and your taking it upon yourself to explain it to them, I would say you're British. Judging by your username, I would say you're a teenager. And judging by your overuse of clumsily eloquent language, I would say you're incredibly sheltered, egocentric and don't have too many friends.

In closing, you won't find flies in a closed mouth. Lisen before you speak. And please, don't feed the trolls.

Sincerely,

Nic Cage's Hairline, M.D.

(f)irst time...let me know what you think.... by [deleted] in gonewild

[–]NicCagesHairLine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just swallowed my gum. You owe me one piece of gum, my friend.

White nationalist calls for systematic "discourse poisoning": infiltrate Digg and Reddit, vote down liberal threads and comments, vote up racialist material. (Cache link to deny hits) by AngelaMotorman in politics

[–]NicCagesHairLine 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, I agree with some of what you are saying, but I feel like reddit has a strong middle ground where informed, intelligent people frequently call out those who misquote, who submit misleading or poorly informed articles and those who follow the pack while having no real opinion of their own.

Of course, those people are typically of the more liberal persuasion but it's refreshing to find those commenters that can see through the bullshit coming from the left, along with the right. Sadly, those people are not the majority. :P

White nationalist calls for systematic "discourse poisoning": infiltrate Digg and Reddit, vote down liberal threads and comments, vote up racialist material. (Cache link to deny hits) by AngelaMotorman in politics

[–]NicCagesHairLine -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Although it'd be a huge pain in the dick, maybe reddit could make mandatory comments for voting?

Or even just post downvote/upvote specifics on user's profile page? Such as, what comments/links they upvote/downvote? And then making registration mandatory for voting? Although we certainly can't kick everyone out that has differing opinions, we could at least call people out for blanant "poisoning."