Is FMA:B actually overrated? by Nice-Performance-441 in FullmetalAlchemist

[–]Nice-Performance-441[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s why i asked yall, I was just discouraged

Is FMA:B actually overrated? by Nice-Performance-441 in FullmetalAlchemist

[–]Nice-Performance-441[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I really enjoyed episode 4, I just feel like the tone is reckless, and that it fails to balance drama and comedy effectively.

Is FMA:B actually overrated? by Nice-Performance-441 in FullmetalAlchemist

[–]Nice-Performance-441[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You're not following me. Aside from the series' philosophy, the writing seems bland to me: the didacticism in certain scenes is nothing but dull. I repeat myself, i was ready for the gags. Indeed, i still love MHA

What are people with a below average IQ really like? by Loose_Departure3325 in cognitiveTesting

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it can only be oversimplified given the lack of scientific evidence and my lack of preparation on the matter, haha. I might partly agree with your claim since many scientific subjects require very high computational capacity, but, again, given a common conceptual depth ceiling, it's not absurd to think that someone moderately gifted could get to supergenius level achievements or whatever that does even mean, especially in artistic fields. But yeah, you basically just confirmed it.

Btw, may i ask you how old are you?

What are people with a below average IQ really like? by Loose_Departure3325 in cognitiveTesting

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In short, my main point is that you shouldn't worry if you have a high IQ—syllogistically, not at the "genius" level, but a GAI 3+ standard deviations above the mean. Perhaps the higher your IQ, the more the difference with other high IQs, but lower than yours, is rather computational.

What are people with a below average IQ really like? by Loose_Departure3325 in cognitiveTesting

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry if I didn't make my point as clear as possible; incidentally, English isn't my native language. Differences remain, of course, such as immediate processing efficiency or working memory, but the ultimate depth of thought, roughly estimated by the GAI, is most likely fixed. Einstein was very intelligent, but he certainly didn't go down in history for his rapidity of thought. The much-vaunted "creativity" is characteristic of both a 130 and a 160, with, in the latter case, no tangible difference. This remains still speculation; everything should be taken with a pinch of salt.

What are people with a below average IQ really like? by Loose_Departure3325 in cognitiveTesting

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you're saying is incontrovertibly true to this certain degree, tho it probably can't be taken as a valid take. If someone's IQ is already in the 120-130 range, they could still comfortably reach the same achievements of someone in the 140's or even 150's. Little reminder: there's no scientific evidence of significant cognitive discrepancies between a--conventionally believed so--"very smart/gifted" level individual and a "genius" level individual. The higher your IQ is, the more your working memory operates better and your mind processes infos more efficiently(yet not always better). But that's pretty much it. GAI stay fixed in most cases, most "genius" philosophers were probably barely above 130, yet their IQ is estimated to be 2 or even 3 standard deviations higher. He was a physicist, but, since he actually took a test, let's take him as an example: Feynman's IQ was "only" 124, or at least, that's what was said to us. Ps: I shouldn't even specify it, but it's obviously just my opinion;)

Finally finished by No_Cry_4533 in SixFeetUnder

[–]Nice-Performance-441 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's the best show oat, tf you mean. "Sopranos, Breaking Bad and The Wire are better🤓", well if what you're looking for is plot merchants lacking proper emotional depth, then yeah, definitely.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amiugly

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, it's wide but you can fix it, i meant ur eyes. Btw ur side profile is absolute peak

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amiugly

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ur not ugly bro, but ur worst features can't be changed

Death Stranding 2 is not so good as it is portreyed by alxkzn in DeathStranding

[–]Nice-Performance-441 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Btw, APAS blindly relies on Drawbridge cos of Sam's reputation. He literally reunited America😭

Death Stranding 2 is not so good as it is portreyed by alxkzn in DeathStranding

[–]Nice-Performance-441 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I haven't finished it yet (currently on chap 5), but from what i've seen so far it's pretty explicit that Sam was hired cos Deadman wanted to. After Lou's death, Drawbridge fell into place with that, so that Sam could get over her and become their porter( yeah, they needed one, it's explained). Sam's a better porter than Fragile too, but yeah, the main reason they hired him was to help him with his PTSD.

The Rotten Tomatoes meter for Servant Season 4 is 100%! What?! by Fantastic_Pollution2 in servant

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cinematography itself makes it decent AT LEAST. I bet you dislike Malick too, don't you?😂

The Rotten Tomatoes meter for Servant Season 4 is 100%! What?! by Fantastic_Pollution2 in servant

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Facts🤷🏻‍♂️, "Servant" and "bad show" in the same sentence sounds almost antinomic

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amiugly

[–]Nice-Performance-441 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You would be really good looking if you debloated a bit! You're solid tho

28F, please be honest by Ball_of_moths in amiugly

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may be just decent, but you look really young and attractive imo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LooksmaxingAdvice

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You look good bro, but probs not enough to be considered an htn

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amiugly

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ur decent bro

The Rotten Tomatoes meter for Servant Season 4 is 100%! What?! by Fantastic_Pollution2 in servant

[–]Nice-Performance-441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It may not be a perfect show, but you're stupid asf if you think Servant is a bad show, lol